Enslaved > Alan Wake
Its just very odd for a game that dropped to $10 soon after its release. I mean, ill probably pick it up during a Steam sale but this is so weird.
Enslaved > Alan Wake
Most games are better than Alan Wake though.
Most games are better than Alan Wake though.
You didn't like spending 10 hours pointing your flashlight at dudes?
I loved Alan Wake.
Wasn't a fan of this game, but I'll get it anyway for the PC to support the recent trend of publishers daring to put more of their games on Steam.
Even though they've got pretty much nothing to lose at this point, considering the age of this particular one.
in opposite landYep Alan Wake is fantastic and it's especially better than the pile of shite that is Enslaved.
At the same 2-4 types of dudes that is. Yeah it was pretty damn tedious and not tense at all, especially since it was so easy to hoard supplies. The story parts, which was clearly the main focus of the game, was terribly written and it had some of the worst voice acting, lip syncing and faces in a cinematic game even for that time period (Heavenly Sword for example did all that stuff waaaay better and it came out even earlier in the generation than Alan Wake).
Let's get back to discussing Enslaved.
This is weird, Enslaved is a very bad game so I doubt many people requested namco to do this port, I guess they have a sequel because there is no way Namco will want to revive for no reasons.
Its in an Alan Wake situation where even if the PC version does tremendously, its just too late to greenlight a sequel.
Namco just wants to generate the largest amount of income it can from the property. A PC port done correctly, and cheaply, can do just that.
If they just want money with cheap port that will require good pricing for the late PC port, and I doubt that Namco will do this, earlier this year Ace Combat Assault Horizon was $30 on Steam when it got released.
If they just want money with cheap port that will require good pricing for the late PC port, and I doubt that Namco will do this, earlier this year Ace Combat Assault Horizon was $30 on Steam when it got released.
Then gave the game to a friend's son!
Have they actually implied that the game is getting a physical release on PS3? I think the reason why there will be a PS3 version but no 360 version is because the game is alrealdy available digitally through GoD. As far as I know it was never released on PSN (correct me if I'm wrong).I would say it is because they want to avoid a retail release, since those tend to cost more money, but the PS3 version would be an easy counter-argument to that point.
Have they actually implied that the game is getting a physical release on PS3? I think the reason why there will be a PS3 version but no 360 version is because the game is alrealdy available digitally through GoD. As far as I know it was never released on PSN (correct me if I'm wrong).
Re-releasing it together with a PC release makes sense marketing-wise. Probably requires a minimal amount of effort.
So why no 360 version?
And why so late?
so, is this gonna have a ghost re release or what? the only confirmation we have is that polygon update but that's about it
Without this leak, really no one would know this game exists at this point.
Namco will probably have an official press release closer to the ship date.
360 is considered the better version of the consoles. Odd it's not included.
Hmm. I picked up a PS3 copy at a GameStop sale for $5 recently. Hope it's worth at least that much.The 360 version is so much better than the PS3 version. I compared them maybe a year ago and the difference in framerate and graphical quality is pretty amazing.
A game that bombed is getting a PC port 3 years after it came out on consoles.
Yeah, congrats to the twelve people who will buy this.
A game that bombed is getting a PC port 3 years after it came out on consoles.
Yeah, congrats to the twelve people who will buy this.
This posts sounds salty. There is always a market for niche stuff on PC.