Glass Rebel
Member
Letting a extra pc run to get it to streaming?
Yeah. I mean, not primarily but as an extra function.
Letting a extra pc run to get it to streaming?
Letting a extra pc run to get it to streaming?
I don't know how to feel about this.
Can't wait for either confirmation or dubunkedtation of this.
C'mon West Coast, wake up!
we need some statement by Valve. They are destroying the hype on Steambox as hours passes.
you are basing all facts on their kickstarter specs and pricepoint. put that out of your head and wait untill the announcement.
its doable to get the price around 399/499 and still get a next gen competing system. I mean if microsoft or sony can do it, why not valve? mass producing will solve allot of cost issues.
StreamBox.... not SteamBox =)
The key here is low power consumption and versatility... not necessarily power.
Microsoft and Sony lose billions of dollars doing it. Can Valve?
In this case what's stopping Microsoft or Sony creating a 200w, 5 times bigger package that obliterates anything we've ever seen or dreamt of?
I don't get it. So how powerful is this thing? Twice, three, four, ten times an xbox360? At 40w?
Have I missed something? has tech advanced so far as to provide a high end PC in a box the size of Rubik's cube? This will run the latest pc games at 60fps 720p, 1080p?
In this case what's stopping Microsoft or Sony creating a 200w, 5 times bigger package that obliterates anything we've ever seen or dreamt of?
It's obviously not the Valve-developed hardware (Steambox) if it even exists, but it is the linux hardware running Steam, that the Valve engineer mentioned as of late (which is not the Steambox, if it even exists).
Broken culture? What the fuck are you talking about?This sounds...dreadful.
Fits Valves frankly broken culture atm. What are they doing?
Seems their just sticking some money...in stuff...
No wonder they need greenlight, its becoming very clear Valve is painfully out of touch.
Waste of time.
2013 is going to have a lot of waste.
Which am fine with as I missed the 80s and 90s.
Broken culture? What the fuck are you talking about?
how could this launch for 400-450$??
The A10 that some people think is being used in the current version is about 2x-3x a 360. In most areas, less than that in some (e.g. no eDRAM).I don't get it. So how powerful is this thing? Twice, three, four, ten times an xbox360? At 40w?
Have I missed something? has tech advanced so far as to provide a high end PC in a box the size of Rubik's cube? This will run the latest pc games at 60fps 720p, 1080p?
I don't get it. So how powerful is this thing? Twice, three, four, ten times an xbox360? At 40w?
Have I missed something? has tech advanced so far as to provide a high end PC in a box the size of Rubik's cube? This will run the latest pc games at 60fps 720p, 1080p?
In this case what's stopping Microsoft or Sony creating a 200w, 5 times bigger package that obliterates anything we've ever seen or dreamt of?
I already posted it in the Steambox speculation thread, but just to reiterate: I've never been very interested with the Steambox as a piece of hardware to begin with; I'm far more interested in what they are going to do with the software side and Linux support.I expect a lot of people to be extremely disappointed with this thing.
I already posted it in the Steambox speculation thread, but just to reiterate: I've never been very interested with the Steambox as a piece of hardware to begin with; I'm far more interested in what they are going to do with the software side and Linux support.
But yeah, so far this sounds quite underwhelming in terms of rough power.
Still, we are not even sure if this is supposed to be the Steambox or not.
Valve backing them financially doesn't mean much; maybe that's just to take advantage of some patent or something.
I already posted it in the Steambox speculation thread, but just to reiterate: I've never been very interested with the Steambox as a piece of hardware to begin with; I'm far more interested in what they are going to do with the software side and Linux support.
But yeah, so far this sounds quite underwhelming in terms of rough power.
Still, we are not even sure if this is supposed to be the Steambox or not.
Valve backing them financially doesn't mean much; maybe that's just to take advantage of some patent or something.
sry but why not just only use wireless HDMI (will be more lagfree than wlan) for your PC if u really want to connect your PC with your TV withou any Cable? Why buy such an expansive Box to stream your windows PC on the TV oO?
Wireless HDMI is still pretty expensive, last I checked.
Waiting on official word from Valve and specific details. I don't understand how they would market something like this, outside of creating a small niche at most.
I would expect one to have either Thunderbolt or MXM. Makes little sense to exclude any sort of expansion and hope to compete for any long period of time.Any chance this thing has a thunderbolt ish port so you can drop a bigger GPU on it. I would love a standard CPU box you upgrade every other time and then gpu box the other years.
The collapse that has been predicted for every year for the last 5-10 years?- Prepare for the inevitable desktop PC collapse thanks to devices like iPad
The collapse that has been predicted for every year for the last 5-10 years?
Valve are diluting their own brand, perfect.
The collapse that has been predicted for every year for the last 5-10 years?
Valve are diluting their own brand, perfect.
Valve are diluting their own brand, perfect.
This has to be the worst managed hardware announcement ever, including Gizmondo. I mean, some random ODM guy waving a cube with some cryptic hearsay specs, no pricing, no publisher announcements, no gaming demonstrations, no use cases explained, no controller. They really couldn't even bother to get Gaben on stage to do, you know, a mini keynote, or put the tiniest product page up.