• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

"Verrit, a media platform for the 65.8 million" (NeoGAF authentication code: 1429529)

370.png

Yall heard of dat Verrit? It's the place to be!
 
Another last gasp for relevancy from someone who managed to be so unappealing she lost an election to a balding orange hamster
 
The way she's cringing her way back into the media makes me believe she wants to run for 2020. You're a loser of epic proportions, go away.

She won more popular vote than the current elected president...

Not sure how that makes anyone a loser of epic proportions.
 
Another last gasp for relevancy from someone who managed to be so unappealing she lost an election to a balding orange hamster

I have a problem with shaming a female presidential candidate, especially one who campaigned on breaking the glass ceiling, into going into hiding after losing to someone who abuses women. It's the worst take possible. I don't care about her relevancy or how uncomfortable it makes anyone feel, this is a historic candidate who has reached out to girls across the country with a positive message. It's meaningful that she would show the world that even in these insane circumstances, it's better to hold your head up than to hide.
 
Hardcore Clinton evangelists absolutely mystify me. How can you be so loyal to someone with so little charisma?

I understand wanting to support her policies, but these guys seem like they'd jump off a building for her.
 
Genuine question from an outsider, who is this guy? Seems a bit mental. Without going through Google I'm going to guess campaign manager/staff of some sort? If the answer is he's not even part of Clinton's staff, then, eeek.

As for this topic, this was unexpected. Ah well, strange idea will see the full force of the internet trolling it into oblivion. I can see the Verrit confirmed images of random quotes and memes have already started!

Even HRC's own staff considers Daou unhinged (per one of the leaked emails), which makes it all the more curious that she would publicly endorse his efforts.

Fun fact: look up what Daou had to say about Obama's foreign policy back in the day. Dude sounded like Glenn fuckin' Greenwald.

Of course, it's pretty apparent now that he was just looking for reasons to bash Obama out of bitterness over the primary.
 
Hardcore Clinton evangelists absolutely mystify me. How can you be so loyal to someone with so little charisma?

I understand agreeing with her policies, but these guys seem like they'd jump off a building for her.

It mystifies me how so many Americans have such a lack of judgement of character that they are mystified by Hillary Clinton and the additional challenges that a female candidate faces at that level of politics. There's apparently a problem with her 'charisma', while the guy who won is entirely indecent, lacks any semblance of character and has no redeeming human qualities. But there's still something about Clinton, right? What is her deal, she's so unappealing. Mystifying.
 
It mystifies me how so many Americans have such a lack of judgement of character that they are mystified by Hillary Clinton and the additional challenges that a female candidate faces at that level of politics. There's apparently a problem with her 'charisma', while the guy who won is entirely indecent, lacks any semblance of character and has no redeeming human qualities. But there's still something about Clinton, right? What is her deal, she's so unappealing. Mystifying.

Her gender is a part of this, but part of it is a very successful smear campaign that's been after her since the 90s. She's been smeared so thoroughly that her own supporters have still, to a degree, bought into it. You even see element of it on this site, which is very pro.

Not saying that she hasn't been partly to blame here, but there is an external element here.
 
This isn't any candidate, this is Hillary Clinton, the person who managed to crowd out every potential challenger against her in the 2016 primary before it even begun. How often has that happened in US politics history?

The Clintons retain a lot of allies in the DNC and congrsssional leadership, and donors. These are very old and very loyal friends, and Loyalty is the number 1 thing Hillary Clinton cares about.

How many serious criticisms have we heard towards Hillary and those allies from the Democratic party after Trump won? They couldn't even replace Pelosi.

I can't imagine Clinton 2020 will have the same dominating position over the party as she had in 2016 and is outlined in 'Shattered'. But those friends aren't going away, and there's an argument that she can make.

What a dumb time to take a stupid shotbat Pelosi.


Btw I'm convinced you need her to run so you can feel justified in your extreme animus.
 
Her gender is a part of this, but part of it is a very successful smear campaign that's been after her since the 90s. She's been smeared so thoroughly that her own supporters have still, to a degree, bought into it. You even see element of it on this site, which is very pro.

Not saying that she hasn't been partly to blame here, but there is an external element here.

That's accurate.

It's interesting how in a country full of odd personalities, a few quirks and odd character traits make her such an enigma. It's total bullshit really, they're either drawing conclusions based on their own bigotry, conscious or not, as well as their misconceptions due to propaganda/smear. It's not Hillary Clinton's character that was the problem, it was the voters and those who don't have the judgement of character who find it 'mystifying' that she would be deserving of support.

Apologies to gaf who just wanted to troll that shitty site, but every Clinton thread has this kind of dumb shit that should get called out.
 
Outside of criticizing them for using WordPress this entire post boils down to "these auth codes can't be used outside of Verrit"... and?


------
This Verrit site is silly. The design is horrible. And it basically is just a Hillary centric dailykos

Daily Kos is a Hillary-centric Daily kos.
 
It should have been called Ferret, at least then there might be pictures of cute ferrets
https://twitter.com/shanevader/status/905784607634849793

We really gonna turn this thread into a re-ligation of the primary?
Can't all of us regardless of political beliefs just come together and dunk on this terrible terrible idea and enjoy the dankest of memes?
As one of the biggest offenders of this, I totally agree with you lol
 
She won more popular vote than the current elected president...

Not sure how that makes anyone a loser of epic proportions.

She ignored the swing states that pushed the EC win to Trump...she never really took him seriously and played nice instead of going for the jugular as she should have.

Between this and her book, she is screaming for a seat at the table going forward when in reality, she's lost her relevance.
 
She ignored the swing states that pushed the EC win to Trump...she never really took him seriously and played nice instead of going for the jugular as she should have.

Between this and her book, she is screaming for a seat at the table going forward when in reality, she's lost her relevance.

She spent a lot of time and money in PA and FL, and lost them both. They, and WI, MI, Ohio, and Iowa, were all lost to the same white wave.
 
I still can't get over the fact that this website even exists. That someone out there thought that this would appeal to, well, anybody. And if Hillary Clinton endorsing this trainwreck is indicative of her understanding of what happened, then I don't need to read her book to know it's not going to contain any real insights.

Also, relax people. She's not running in 2020. That practically every Democrat of any prominence is wink-wink-totally-not-thinking-about-a-2020-run makes that clear. And in the unlikely event that she did run she wouldn't even be competitive in the primary.
 
I still can't get over the fact that this website even exists. That someone out there thought that this would appeal to, well, anybody. And if Hillary Clinton endorsing this trainwreck is indicative of her understanding of what happened, then I don't need to read her book to know it's not going to contain any real insights.

Also, relax people. She's not running in 2020. That practically every Democrat of any prominence is wink-wink-totally-not-thinking-about-a-2020-run makes that clear. And in the unlikely event that she did run she wouldn't even be competitive in the primary.
It doesn't contain insights. A lot of finger pointing from what I'm hearing/seeing. Still taking barely any accountability.

And yeah if she did run in 2020, she'd get bodied pretty hard early on. DNC really needs to distance themselves from the Clintons.
 
What a dumb time to take a stupid shotbat Pelosi.


Btw I'm convinced you need her to run so you can feel justified in your extreme animus.

I supported Hillary during the primary and the general. I admire her pragmatic, serious, technocratic approach to politics and her foreign policy.

She's also a flawed candidate, exposed to decades of baggage and miscalculated priorities (taking paid speeches from wall street during time of historic anger at the financial class, her email misjudgement etc). None of this compares to Trump's flaws, but they're real and reinforced negative perceptions of her.

Her campaign was a failure because she was all strategy, all policy, with no simplistic message that could be meme'd to everyone. You can see swivel-eyed loons for Trump every time you turn on Fox, he invites and cultivates a cult-like following because he's all charm, no substance.

My mystification comes from not understanding why you need swivel-eyed loons for a serious, policy-based platform like Hillary's. It feels to me like a sensible party, focused on evidence and rigorous policy proposals, shouldn't need a 'Breitbart' equivalent.
 
What world are you from. He went scorched earth on her and the party and screamed that the primary was RIIIIIIIIIGGED.

She handled him with kid gloves and didn't get personal. She didn't talk about the rape essay, that time his wife bankrupted a college, or the infamous crime bill that he not only voted for but campaigned on for reelection.

If he runs in 2020, being soft on him won't be a mistake his opponents will make.

He endorsed her and stumped for her after he lost.
 
My mystification comes from not understanding why you need swivel-eyed loons for a serious, policy-based platform like Hillary's. It feels to me like a sensible party, focused on evidence and rigorous policy proposals, shouldn't need a 'Breitbart' equivalent.

Because Verrit was created by an HRC personality cultist with a severe persecution complex, and is aimed strictly at other HRC personality cultists with similar persecution complexes. Despite what Daou says, it's not actually for the vast majority of Clinton primary or general voters, let alone for anyone who supported HRC primarily for substantive, policy-based reasons.
 
In fairness to this website, if Verrit memes end up replacing that played-out image of the guy looking at the other woman, it will have justified its existence based on that alone.
 
What world are you from. He went scorched earth on her and the party and screamed that the primary was RIIIIIIIIIGGED.

She handled him with kid gloves and didn't get personal. She didn't talk about the rape essay, that time his wife bankrupted a college, or the infamous crime bill that he not only voted for but campaigned on for reelection.

If he runs in 2020, being soft on him won't be a mistake his opponents will make.

Scorched earth? lol
 
We really gonna turn this thread into a re-ligation of the primary?
Can't all of us regardless of political beliefs just come together and dunk on this terrible terrible idea and enjoy the dankest of memes?

I think this has been answered a million times since the start of the year.

It's clear we cannot manage, even when we try our damndest, we seem to fail.
 
Is this real? I can't fucking tell anymore. 2017 is just nonstop Poe's law.

Don't think so, but I feel like I remember one poster here either being employed by the Clinton campaign or CTR or something along those lines. Not that he was ever trying to be clandestine about it.

Of course shit was real weird and I was always drunk last year so that might be a fake memory.
 
Have 0 interest in anything Hillary has to say, her stupid book or this bizarre attempt at artificially creating a super left twitter.
 
Top Bottom