I thought I heard on the bombcast that it doesn't even work on 360 anymore? I could be wrong.
Former Blu-Ray competitor. Backed by Toshiba and Microsoft, plus a few exclusive movie studios.
It died for a good cause.
I just bought 4 more hddvds for $8 this past week. I think I have all the good ones now.WTF is HD-DVD
MS better not be using all that RAM for DVR features that few people will actually use.
At the start of the XBox and XBox 360 projects, you had J Allard, Peter Moore, and Robbie Bach setting those features and budgets. Budgets that were considered "strategic" (Meaning losses were irrelevant as long as marketshare was gained). Now you have Mark Whitten, Ben Kilgore and David Treadwell. All good people, but none of them visionaries. Working with a company directive that IEB must now be, and remain, profitable. And _grow_ profit from year to year.
It's full BC.
You just have to plug your x360 in that HDMI in.
Alright Sherlock, we won't speculate anymore.
Sony > MS, Orbis > Durango. We will get Kinect shoved down or throats, and there won't even be a traditional like controller.
Hell they are probably planning for no games post 2014, it's all a smoke screen.
I want to see what MS' teams have been working on. Most of the teams have been idle for 2+ years. I also want to know more about the new studios, hell a name for some of them would be great
A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
Former Blu-Ray competitor. Backed by Toshiba and Microsoft, plus a few exclusive movie studios.
It died for a good cause.
A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
Yeah. Am from the UK where the internet-TV services seem pretty strong (basically BBC iplayer dragged them along); but am never sure how good it is elsewhere.
Still. I think if this was as achievable as some think then I'd be able to do it with my Cable Provider already...who is also my Internet provider. Who you'd expect to be able to create the system more than someone just making a box.
Much better would be to download on home wireless to your phone/tablet and then be able to look at the content outside the home.
We'll see what comes, am not too excited for any of it though. I just don't see what MS can bring to the market no one else can.
How depressing.
Further I don't understand why posters are not pleasant surprised that one of the aims of data move could lead to a cache miss dropping from 300+ GPU cycles to 10-20. As ERP put it hiding 10-20 cycles is easy compared to 300. That type of efficiency seems very impressive to me.
You could argue the same on both sides tbh.
I don't think Sony or Nintendo are any different. In fact, hardware profitability has been Nintendo's absolute priority for many years now. Given the shaky state of Sony, I don't think they're willing to sink money with every PS4 sold either.A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
2005, ps3 was said to have double the flops of 360 but devs and other insiders said it was super efficient, but people on here said it sounded like crap and then started to call it xbox 1.5 after KenK made his comment.
Cell was double the flops of 360 cpu, while the GPU is not.
FWIW, I am listing the raw peak data here:
PS3
CPU: 230.4 GFLOPS
GPU: 400.4 GFLOPS
Total: 630.8 GFLOPS
360:
CPU: 115.2 GFLOPS
GPU: 240 GFLOPS
Total: 355.2 GFLOPS
The gap is bigger than that of PS4/720.
I don't think Sony or Nintendo are any different. In fact, hardware profitability has been Nintendo's absolute priority for many years now. Given the shaky state of Sony, I don't think they're willing to sink money with every PS4 sold either.
As for executives not being visionaries anymore, you could argue the same about Yamauchi vs Iwata and Kutaragi vs Hirai...
Yeah nothing too shocking about this. You could say the equivalent Allard at Sony was Ken Kutaragi and he got his ass booted. I would imagine its the same environment at Sony, maybe even more so considering their financial position.
I don't think Sony or Nintendo are any different. In fact, hardware profitability has been Nintendo's absolute priority for many years now. Given the shaky state of Sony, I don't think they're willing to sink money with every PS4 sold either.
As for executives not being visionaries anymore, you could argue the same about Yamauchi vs Iwata and Kutaragi vs Hirai...
AFAICS the Data Move engines aren't going to make up any computational difference, they might let software better exploit the 32MB scratch pad.will someone be kind enough to give me link to these ERP comments, or at least write what he said
I understand that BC can be a nice feature but not sure why it is so important. If it didn't have BC I would just keep my 360 plugged in too.
Or is there another reason people want BC so bad?
Space and convenience basically. I'd rather have one device which works for both platforms. Also, my entertainment center only has so much room.
Yeah. Sad to see the father of an iconic brand in gaming go like this. If it were not for his insistence Sony would not have got into this business in the first place. Wonder what he is doing now..
That's quite blunt. I think the most interesting part of it was the mention of "strategic" spending on Xbox/360, and how that is now over.A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
Cheers for this!A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
You really expected them to post $1B losses per year in the first 2 years after Xbox 3's launch? Of course that strategic spending would be over.That's quite blunt. I think the most interesting part of it was the mention of "strategic" spending on Xbox/360, and how that is now over.
This is my biggest worry for the nextbox.Yes you certainly could argue that but it just feels that the policy shift has been running longer and deeper at MS.
Thing is, the console I was playing 06/07 feels very different than the 360 today (not in a good way).
A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
Yeah. Sad to see the father of an iconic brand in gaming go like this. If it were not for his insistence Sony would not have got into this business in the first place. Wonder what he is doing now..
Depends on the developer.
Itagaki, Yu Suzuki, Hideo Kojima... etc
Ilhere pretty much said both consoles are a wash. I don't know how hard that is to understand.
First party devs are the ones forced to speak PR bullshit. Unless they have freedom.
A very interesting post by former MS bod bkilian over at B3D.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1697443&postcount=449
I thought it was interesting considering how many of us are concerned about how the xbox is moving forward. Here is a taster...
Because I don't want 5 consoles connected to my TV.
Of course not.
You want 10 consoles connected.
That's quite blunt. I think the most interesting part of it was the mention of "strategic" spending on Xbox/360, and how that is now over.
Cheers for this!
And I couldn't agree with you more. Sony started this generation very corporate like with complacency becoming its middle name. You could tell they thought "playstation" guaranteed success.
As we know though, us gamers gave them a sharp kick to the love department, which does seem to have woken them up from their comfortable snooze.
MS though, just dont seem to be getting the same message we gamers are starting to send them to wake them from their own complacency. I just have a feeling that MS are going to pay the price for that next gen and I dont feel that MS shareholders will give them any reprieve from any such failure
Thinking about Durango's 8GB RAM and I remember the talk of memory chips and densities. Does anyone know how many RAM chips are expected in Durango?
hdmi port replicator manufacturers are the real winner for next gen businessOf course not.
You want 10 consoles connected.
WTF is HD-DVD
8Gb modules exist in large quantities these days?Im guessing 8x 8Gb
I hurrrd xbox will be powerzed by the doritos....
Why is this MS spec sheet complacent, I saw a demo of what I can only imagine will be the Kinect 2 today and it looked very impressive. If they ship that with the Xbox next it will explain the relatively anemic budget for the hardware, basically I would not call MS out till we know everything about what is being shipped and price.
Primesense demo - https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4VtXvj4X0CE