• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Warcraft - Leaked SDCC Footage

Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope they realize that humans are almost just as big as orcs in the Warcraft series. Like a human paladin can go toe to toe with an orc in battle.
 
I'm positively surprised how the design is pretty much the same as in the Blizzard cinematics.


Yeah, don't like the floaty camera at all
Adventures of TinTin was probably the worst offender.

Yep. Tintin was total amateur hour. It was shocking to see something so uncinematic from Spielberg. Still liked it.
 
There are quite a few negative impressions here. Were that many people expecting something more like Lord of the Rings instead of something Dreamworks/Pixar-esque or Avatar-esque?
 
There are quite a few negative impressions here. Were that many people expecting something more like Lord of the Rings instead of something Dreamworks/Pixar-esque or Avatar-esque?

Most WoW fans were (are?) expecting this to be the next LOTR.

edit: In terms of popularity*
 
I'm worried about the CGI/live action interactions. This looks on par with the cinematic trailer they released for Warlords of Draenor. If it was all CGI animation with no live action I'd feel better because I'd be more sure of what I was getting.
 
I'm worried about the CGI/live action interactions. This looks on par with the cinematic trailer they released for Warlords of Draenor. If it was all CGI animation with no live action I'd feel better because I'd be more sure of what I was getting.

Obviously hard to get a real feel for it from the quality of that footage, but I don't feel like Garona was really out of place among CGI environment and characters. You can tell she's a live actor but it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb. Her makeup looked really good so that helped. The real test will be seeing Orcs and dwarves interacting with humans.
 
Expecting this movie to look like The Lord of the Rings was ridiculous from the start. Peter Jackson's mandate to Weta when they were creating/designing Middle-earth was to make it as real as possible. He didn't want typical "fantasy" designs, he wanted them to approach the world as though the people and places in the story were real and existed at one point. It ended up working because The Lord of the Rings lends itself to that approach very well.

Warcraft, on the other hand, is about as fantastically fantastic as fantasy gets. The realistic approach wouldn't make sense at all given the aesthetic and brand of fantasy that Warcraft has defined itself as.

We're talking about a world where dwarves and gnomes fly gyrocopters, drive tanks and eight-foot, bipedal talking cows ride elephant/rhino hybrids. The world is more than a little nutty, and Jones' approach makes plenty of sense.
 
that pic of the orc looks way better than the other one, and arguably better than davy jones, but it still doesn't look real in the same way something like the apes from dotpota did.

I'll be honest. I thought most of the apes were real. The orangutan in particular.. it's fairly common to teach them sign language so he didn't do anything that made me think he was fake. That's amazing.
 
Fantasy fans will watch it. Kids will watch it. Some people will watch it because of the hype it will get short before release. I really don't think it will bomb....

My prediction is that itll make enough to cover its cost plus a little more if 100million is indeed an accurate number

But it aint gonna be some 300-400 million dollar movie in the USA
 
Hi Guys! I just punched my eyes in raw with my fists, poured salt onto them and then allowed someone to urinate all over my face to wash away the sodium and blood that was congealing into my sockets.

Afterwards, I watched the barely view-able-to-begin-with SDCC footage here of the Warcraft Trailer and I can accurately state, without any doubt, that this movie looks bad. I'm not impressed with how badly this footage makes my eyes hurt. The more I tried to watch it, the closer I got to losing consciousness due to the pain. I can really tell how poor the CG is. It is that apparent, even though most things are completely indiscernible by the irreparable damaged I did to my eyes previously and the terrible quality of the potato cam footage given.

This movie never stood a chance. Now let me talk to you about Batman....
 
Most WoW fans were (are?) expecting this to be the next LOTR.

2361855-6442745602-wpid-m.jpeg
 
It's so bizarre that people hate CGI on a video game forum.

People hate CGI in their movies and they hate real camera footage in their games.

Games are supposed to be CGI, and movies are supposed to be real people. Thus it was spoken.
 
Edmond Dantès;171984529 said:
Storywise is this closer to Tolkien's brand of fantasy or writers such as Michael Moorcock?

Well, it was written by Duncan Jones himself and will be following the story established in Warcraft 1 and the novels "The Last Guardian" and "Rise of the Horde."

Not sure which one that lines up with more.
 
Most WoW fans were (are?) expecting this to be the next LOTR.

edit: In terms of popularity*

Even after your edit this makes no sense. WoW's popularity has been on the decline for four years, why would the expectations from its current fanbase track the Warcraft's film alongside a billion dollar film franchise?

The 'yuck CGI' comments don't make any sense, I'm much, much more worried that everything else about the movie is going to be very poorly done. Oh look it's a shot of two orcs in love that looks lifted from every romantic film ever made. Oh look, a character is pointing out how green the other orcs skin is. Oh hey I think I heard Chris Metzen's voice again. The CGI could very well be the best part of this movie.
 
that pic of the orc looks way better than the other one, and arguably better than davy jones, but it still doesn't look real in the same way something like the apes from dotpota did.

Well, Apes are based in reality, whereas the real orcs died out thousands of years ago, leaving no living model to base them on. The apes look great, but they are also a finished product.
 
Edmond Dantès;171984529 said:
Storywise is this closer to Tolkien's brand of fantasy or writers such as Michael Moorcock?

Tolkein influences run deep in warcraft lore, a few events are almost directly lifted from events in the silmarillion.

However I wouldn't say it's gonna be anywhere near Tolkein aesthetically. Magic in WoW is a lot more prominent and it's directly tied to demons in some way or another.

It's very over the top and grandiose, honestly I think this movie should be a lot of fun but I doubt it will be very good.
 
The entire first page of "Ew gross CGI it looks terrible" from an offscreen cell phone enlarged sneak-video is why we can't have nice things.

Anything and everything looks like shit like that.
 
That camera move is slow enough though that it looks believable. You can imagine a helicopter doing that shot. If Jackson directed that scene it would have started at an orc's foot hitting the ground in closeup and started pushing through the crowd inches away from orcs and swept up into the air at 100mph before flying up the portal and canting slightly sideways and coming to a complete rest.
I can only say that it looked strange to me. I suppose it's rather subjective.

Yep. Tintin was total amateur hour. It was shocking to see something so uncinematic from Spielberg. Still liked it.
I think with TinTin they felt a need to justify the CG.
"Okay, our movie is 100% CG, so let's also do stuff that's only possible in CG".
That worked great for some the action, but that moving the camera through the eye of a needle perhaps doesn't look all that great gets overshadowed.
 
The entire first page of "Ew gross CGI it looks terrible" from an offscreen cell phone enlarged sneak-video is why we can't have nice things.

Anything and everything looks like shit like that.

Not to mention hearing 'boring' and stuff thrown around a lot, like...it's not a fucking trailer, it's not designed for hype, that's why it's just at SDCC. Idk, I got very little out of it. I thought Gul'dan and the portal looked great and the rest was just 'ok that's fine' since we couldn't really see it at all and we had no context beyond what was obvious.
 
I hope they realize that humans are almost just as big as orcs in the Warcraft series. Like a human paladin can go toe to toe with an orc in battle.

This is true for game-play reasons, but lore-wise that wasn't really the case for much of Warcraft history. Hell, Paladin's didn't even exist until the 2nd war. Your average human footman is not only physically dwarfed by an Orc, but also did not live his entire life shaped by a culture that promoted and glorified combat.
 
This is true for game-play reasons, but lore-wise that wasn't really the case for much of Warcraft history. Hell, Paladin's didn't even exist until the 2nd war. Your average human footman is not only physically dwarfed by an Orc, but also did not live his entire life shaped by a culture that promoted and glorified combat.

There's also a massive discrepancy in the designs of humans between Warcraft: Orcs and Humans and Warcraft III/WoW. Given that they're taking much of story from the original game they aren't necessarily looking to bring over the unrealistic proportions seen in later installments.

Even the Orcs, while large, are proportioned in a way that makes sense realistically for them, and are closer to the designs seen in Warcraft and WCII.
 
Will there be any nightelfs in this movie? I need my purple fix

Humans and Orcs didn't even know the continent that Night Elves live on existed until Warcraft 3, this movie takes place around Warcraft 1.
 
I actually like what I'm seeing. I've always loved Blizzard cinematics, and honestly CGI was the only way to reasonably bring that world to life.

I really don't mind CGI as long as it's visually consistent (Avatar) and not totally immersion-killing (Sucker-Punch).
 
On one hand, stylistically the shots and dialogue seem like a very high fidelity translation of late nineties PC game CGI cutscene storytelling. Which is kinda dope in a way.

On the other hand, this looks kinda fucking dumb.
 
On one hand, stylistically the shots and dialogue seem like a very high fidelity translation of late nineties PC game CGI cutscene storytelling. Which is kinda dope in a way.

On the other hand, this looks kinda fucking dumb.

Warcraft overall is pretty fucking dumb, but its a good kind of dumb.
 
Most WoW fans were (are?) expecting this to be the next LOTR.

edit: In terms of popularity*
Every friend of mine that plays this game, including myself, expect this to be an okay Summer blockbuster. That's about it. Not sure why you'd think that.
 
Looks Neat!

Looks like in-game cinematic but -THE MOVIE. Exactly what I asked for 10 years ago, exactly what I want now.

Well said. It feels exactly like one if those CGI Trailers from Blizzard and this is what many people are hoping for. I mean look at one of those threads for the new addons, everytime people hope, that they will do a movie like those CGIs.
 
Hi Guys! I just punched my eyes in raw with my fists, poured salt onto them and then allowed someone to urinate all over my face to wash away the sodium and blood that was congealing into my sockets.

Afterwards, I watched the barely view-able-to-begin-with SDCC footage here of the Warcraft Trailer and I can accurately state, without any doubt, that this movie looks bad. I'm not impressed with how badly this footage makes my eyes hurt. The more I tried to watch it, the closer I got to losing consciousness due to the pain. I can really tell how poor the CG is. It is that apparent, even though most things are completely indiscernible by the irreparable damaged I did to my eyes previously and the terrible quality of the potato cam footage given.

This movie never stood a chance. Now let me talk to you about Batman....
I for one appreciate your dedication.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom