Economies of scale, my friend.Armitage said:Using PS3s? That's weird. Seems like it would be cheaper to use custom built machines.
Economies of scale, my friend.Armitage said:Using PS3s? That's weird. Seems like it would be cheaper to use custom built machines.
[CFD] El Capitan said:Good joke.....no seriously though its original. And not completely irritating in anyway whatsoever.
M3wThr33 said:Holy lord. Well, aren't there some games that do that for XBL?
the disgruntled gamer said:That's cool. I hope to see some similar pics for Halo 3 dedicated servers in September.
Blimblim said:That's pretty awesome.
I'd love to see the network admins having to run and maintain a cluster of Xbox 360![]()
SkynetWollan said:
I think your in the wrong thread, the Bioshock thread of awesome is around here somewhere.BenjaminBirdie said:
InterMoniker said:I think your in the wrong thread, the Bioshock thread of awesome is around here somewhere.
What there were never rumors of hosting your own PC server for this game. Its always been dedicate your PS3 as a server or play on your PS3 while your hosting as a server.theBishop said:I guess the rumors of hosting your own PC server aren't happening... :lol
AdmiralViscen said:Wouldn't it be cheaper without using PS3s?
Tiduz said:PS3 has now officially blown me away, @ 4 AM i was charging my controller upstairs @ usb on pc, ps3 is downstairs, i always have a cloth on my ps3 when i dont use it so it doesnt atracts as much dust, i accidentally touched the ps button without knowing and went to sleep.
8 hours later my ps3 made an airplane noise. i turned it off panicking, and wait 2 hours. turned it on, and to my surprise it still works, ive been playing for a day and a half now and i notice no damage at all. holy fuck thats impressive imo. But i now turn it off @ the back when i dont play, just to be sure :lol
I said SIMILAR pics.urk said:I don't think they'll use PS3's for Halo 3, but hey, you never know.
BenjaminBirdie said:She's pointing and laughing at the thoroughly repeated to death joke that just got smooshed.
[CFD] El Capitan said:Someone please price a server allready.
bigger then the ps3, it was kinda closed off you could say, it covered the whole ps3 @ sides/front/backtheBishop said:How big was the cloth?
the disgruntled gamer said:I said SIMILAR pics.
Then again, maybe the power of the PS3 could help Halo 3 finally trump Timesplitters.
Keeps the production lines busy. Costs a fortune to shut them down and start them up, buy allocation etc etc.AdmiralViscen said:Wouldn't it be cheaper without using PS3s?
No kidding. Maybe we'll finally get water that doesn't flow in a pattern.BenjaminBirdie said:Let's start with water that doesn't look like it's being controlled by some lunar module in the fuckin' sky, okay?
AdmiralViscen said:Wouldn't it be cheaper without using PS3s?
AdmiralViscen said:Wouldn't it be cheaper without using PS3s?
kaching said:I'm not familiar with any other rack-mounted server solutions that would be significantly cheaper than a rack of PS3s, even if off-the-shelf PS3s aren't necessarily the most ideally configured to be servers. Not to mention the PS3s would have been purchased at cost. Given that they're being used in a dedicated fashion for one game, it's probably the most economical solution in that context.
It probably has the advantage of keeping their server codebase fairly unified across user and hosted instances.
The Warhawk IGS method means that instead of us forcing players to be connected to the SONY mothership for any and all games, we instead let players host their own servers on their own PS3s. This is fairly unique and it enables a couple of really nice benefits.
Yes it would be. A ~$2000 HP DL380 G4 Server might cost more then the PS3. But it's not like you'd need a server per game. One of those servers could easily handle 5 games, probably closer to 10.AdmiralViscen said:Wouldn't it be cheaper without using PS3s?
Draft said:Well I just think it's nice that they're keeping busy.
Tiduz said:PS3 has now officially blown me away, @ 4 AM i was charging my controller upstairs @ usb on pc, ps3 is downstairs, i always have a cloth on my ps3 when i dont use it so it doesnt atracts as much dust, i accidentally touched the ps button without knowing and went to sleep.
8 hours later my ps3 made an airplane noise. i turned it off panicking, and wait 2 hours. turned it on, and to my surprise it still works, ive been playing for a day and a half now and i notice no damage at all. holy fuck thats impressive imo. But i now turn it off @ the back when i dont play, just to be sure :lol
:lolDraft said:Well I just think it's nice that they're keeping busy.
spwolf said:8 hrs? I left it folding for 3-4 days, like 20x so far and nothing ever happened...
spwolf said:8 hrs? I left it folding for 3-4 days, like 20x so far and nothing ever happened...
Tiduz said:PS3 has now officially blown me away, @ 4 AM i was charging my controller upstairs @ usb on pc, ps3 is downstairs, i always have a cloth on my ps3 when i dont use it so it doesnt atracts as much dust, i accidentally touched the ps button without knowing and went to sleep.
8 hours later my ps3 made an airplane noise. i turned it off panicking, and wait 2 hours. turned it on, and to my surprise it still works, ive been playing for a day and a half now and i notice no damage at all. holy fuck thats impressive imo. But i now turn it off @ the back when i dont play, just to be sure :lol
kaching said:It probably has the advantage of keeping their server codebase fairly unified across user and hosted instances, as well.
Pristine_Condition said:I wonder why each "blade" in the rack has to be connected with TWO USB cables, and not just one...external storage?
Looks like 150 PS3s there. (Two-sided rack) Wish Team GAF had one of those for Folding @ Home!
Erm, correct me if I'm wrong, but I just looked up this model number and the server seems to have a single Xeon processor. How would that even keep up with a single PS3 -- not to mention 5 of them?WhatRuOn said:Yes it would be. A ~$2000 HP DL380 G4 Server might cost more then the PS3. But it's not like you'd need a server per game. One of those servers could easily handle 5 games, probably closer to 10.
AdmiralViscen said:Wouldn't it be cheaper without using PS3s?
elostyle said:Well since sony makes these and probably has warehouses of them to spare it makes sense to use PS3s as servers.