lordfuzzybutt
Member
Actually, of all the games to buck trends and sell well, how the hell was it this one??
It's shipped to retailers well. Not sure about sold to customers.
Actually, of all the games to buck trends and sell well, how the hell was it this one??
Actually, of all the games to buck trends and sell well, how the hell was it this one??
So it should be very cheap soon, good.
And thier friends combined with their obnoxious conversations? It makes me cringe.
From what I've read, it's about a narcissistic hacker group that kill and cause havoc because they want to be popular. It's so blindingly selfish and infantile that I want to take no part in helping them achieve it.
What? God knows what you've been reading because the game is absolutely nothing like that, a quick look in the official thread will confirm this but it sounds like you've already made your decision based on false information.
It's setting?
It makes me sad too, but I can't pretend that it couldn't be a factor. She's not Lara Croft, she's a lone woman in an unknown quantity of a game. I love her from what I've seen. As a #designatedfemalegamer I rarely see women in games who I feel like I actually connect to or see any of myself in, especially in western developed games. It's either a sex toy or a "bad ass checklist girl" or the target in a useless escort mission.This made me sad to read in this list of "negatives" about the game. Aloy seems cool.
Horizon has the privilege of being the next big Sony exclusive and Sony is gonna market the hell out of the game. It can also become another The Order: 1886.
That's the thing even alot of new ips have been having trouble especially from first parties
This isn't good at all it's a good game. Commercially the original was a mega hit btwThis is good, sends out the message that a new ip is better than a sequel unless the original was a mega hit (and I liked Watchdogs)
Except Watch Dogs was a big hit.This is good, sends out the message that a new ip is better than a sequel unless the original was a mega hit (and I liked Watchdogs)
You don't play as "douchey hackers". It's why a lot of people like the sequel more. Everything you thought was wrong about the first game is fixed.But even Watch Dogs is a new IP for this gen and it barely does anything that games 5 years older haven't done already.
On top of that I feel like a lot of new IPs this gen have extremely mundane and uninspiring premises.
Look at Horizon, you just know that game is gonna be a hit, it's set in a post-apocalyptic future where robotic dinosaurs rule the planet and you have to find out how it all happened... Just reading that premise has me hungry to know more.
"You play some douchey hackers in SF harassing a big corporation" doesn't exactly press the same buttons.
And on top of all this I feel like this is a terrible homogenising of genres. Perfect example being the new Tomb Raider games, neither of which are actually.. Tomb Raider games, but rather generic third person shooters with some traversal elements thrown in.
Apparently we're not allowed to have a game based primarily on challenging platforming around tombs with a few brief moments of combat, because that's what Tomb Raider was and it sold fucking gangbusters.
No, because in this era, everything has to be a reskin of AC, Gears or CoD.
Horizon won't be another 1886. It actually has good gameplay. 1886 feels like the developers were more interested in making a movie than a game.Horizon has the privilege of being the next big Sony exclusive and Sony is gonna market the hell out of the game. It can also become another The Order: 1886.
Except Watch Dogs was a big hit.
You don't play as "douchey hackers". It's why a lot of people like the sequel more. Everything you thought was wrong about the first game is fixed.
This is good, sends out the message that a new ip is better than a sequel unless the original was a mega hit (and I liked Watchdogs)
Is this really a message that needs sent out? Good game is good, sequel or not. The assumption a new ip is immediately better is always an interesting one. I think it really sends out the message that we (the uk) are still keeping our purse strings tighter for reasons that are probably above my analysis, and that Ubisoft have to try harder to get the IP right the first time in future, or they will do a disservice to a second, better game in the series.
Not surprised. Went to a few shops this weekend and every store had wd2 as the 'number one' selling game in the chart, yet loads on the shelf. Bf1 and gta5 on the other hand seemed to be flying off the shelves. Lucky to see any in stock anywhere.
In fairness I think gta 5 finally had a price drop but even so, that game has crazy longevity, amazing.
This is good, sends out the message that a new ip is better than a sequel unless the original was a mega hit (and I liked Watchdogs)
Destiny 2 will be HUGE,
Except Watch Dogs was a big hit.
I think what this says is that certain types of games have become a commodity. It's not that people think Watch Dogs 2 is a bad game. It's that it is not interesting enough to buy at release. There is nothing about it to push it to the top of your wish list.Is this really a message that needs sent out? Good game is good, sequel or not. The assumption a new ip is immediately better is always an interesting one.
There goes Watch Dogs 3's happy-go-lucky tone. I expect them to switch gears to try to get back the crowd who liked what the first game promised.
anyone got the sales figures for anywhere outside of the UK. It seems everything is underperforming.
I think what this says is that certain types of games have become a commodity. It's not that people think Watch Dogs 2 is a bad game. It's that it is not interesting enough to buy at release. There is nothing about it to push it to the top of your wish list.
A new game has the potential to give you something different. That's a great incentive to buy it sooner rather than later.
The first didn't sell because of the serious tone and this didn't bomb becuase of its happy-go-lucky ton. Just different times. Remember the E3 hype and "real next gen game".. This is why the game sold.
I don't see how that's so surprising, this whole hipsterness theme was very unappealing to a lot of people.
GTA is so big that it creates its own hype. I think GTA games are just ok, but I always seem to end up buying it due to the hype. Granted that many people love GTA and the hype is deserved, but I think it's astronomical sales are due to its huge hype pushing it into a larger audience.It's in a different league to Watch Dogs IMO. I personally don't think anyone does open world as good as Rockstar.
I have less money than I used to, I didn't like the first game and in general I'm getting annoyed by open world titles.
I have no reason to get the game, no matter how much it has improved.
Starting to sweat about ffxv and tlg at this point. Being goo games aren't enough at this point
Scott Pilgrim bombed cuz people thought it was another "hipster" movie starring Micheal Cera.
Could be the quickest game from release to Black Friday sale at this rate.
Both Titanfall and WD lost goodwill amongst fans for being overhyped, their sequels payed the price. Same thing happened with Syndicate which was a better game then Unity but sold worse because Unity burnt gamers.
Rocksteady better not make another Batman. Knight is clearly the worst in the franchise but sold really well because of the goodwill generated from the first 2 games. I feel same fate would have befell UC4 if it came out like 2-3 years after UC3. Nd were smart to switch to a new ip which also elevated their status and helped UC4.
Genre is saturated... and even if the game is good, people are starting to get bored I think.
Digital should be ok but with this drop compared to the first one, I'm not sure Ubisoft should be happy.
What the hell is going on? It feels like the UK video game market has collapsed in the last few weeks. Every new release with the exception of Fifa 17 and Battlefield 1 is underperforming badly.
[Week 22, 2014] WATCH DOGS (UBISOFT) - 388,000 / NEW
[Week 46, 2016] WATCH DOGS 2 (UBISOFT) - 77,600 / NEW (-80%)
GTA is so big that it creates its own hype. I think GTA games are just ok, but I always seem to end up buying it due to the hype. Granted that many people love GTA and the hype is deserved, but I think it's astronomical sales are due to its huge hype pushing it into a larger audience.
Watch Dogs has none of that. The first game was poorly received. Watch Dogs 2 was fighting an uphill battle because of it, and it's concept wasn't unique enough for people to want to give it another look.
Perhaps the consumer is getting smarter with where they put their money. I think rockstar were right when they said people are feeling very burnt out on similar types of games releasing every year, in Ubisoft's case there's a lot of overlap in the style of their open world games. The Q4 window every year has become very boring as a result and I'm spending less in it, I wonder if others feel the same.
GTA V, Overwatch and Uncharted 4 sold very well through exciting their audience with fresh ideas and design. I hope they're the examples to follow.
And it was!
Just compare the likes of Watch Dogs to the new IP of last gen like Gears of War, BioShock, and Mass Effect. Those felt like something new. A new experience, and universe that you just couldn't wait to play. Watch Dogs felt like more of the same, and with the first game not being received very well, there was little incentive to try the sequel. I don't think anyone was pulling for Watch Dogs to succeed because they wanted to play more of its world.I definitely think that is one thing we could theorise about this game, yea. I wouldn't disagree with that at all. I just think that is one potential explanation (and at least the first part definitely applies for me) but not something that would make me assume it's broadly applicable with sequels and new IPs in general, as the original post I'd quoted had put forth. Your point is a good one, but doesn't consider the stigma Ubi caused with the first game though, and that hangs me up a bit. People don't always want different, and different doesn't inherently trump iteration in a bubble, it's not that simple for me. It was moreso how black and white the original quote put it that I was questioning, rather than not being able to see the point.