I can see where you're going with that, but you're calm right now, you can look at it logically. But when someone is harassing you because of who you are, you're not going to think rationally. I'm definitely not happy this story ended with a death, but I think she was justified in defending herself.
Oh totally. I get that. But being in the heat of the moment doesn't justify killing someone. And I'm sure she gets harassed a lot, which sucks, maybe she snapped because they took it too far? The way I see it is it still doesn't justify killing someone. Only truly, completely life threatening self defense justifies killing someone. And I'm not clear from the article presented whether it is, or isn't. And since the guy didn't throw the bottle at her, how did he threaten her life? It's unclear.
I've been harassed and been in fist fights with strangers, not because of who I am though, so I can't understand what she's gone through in her life. But those retaliation didn't justify killing someone as a response.
My position is I'm really unclear about her being truly life threatened or not from the facts presented. Since she got so little time for manslaughter, it's possible so was the prosecution.
I'm just anti-death more than anything else really. But if you poke a hornet's nest you're liable to get stung. They harassed her and one of them paid the ultimate price for it. If they had left her alone, nothing would have went down.