J J Abrams already ruined Star Trek so I wouldn't be surprised
It's a JJ Abrahms movie, I don't see how it can be anything other then bad.
That photo made me hit up the Google Image Search.
JJ Abrams, 2013, shortly after agreeing to take the job as director of Episode VII
![]()
JJ Abrams, 2015, yesterday:
This movie seems to be taking it out of him a li'l bit.
It will be like any other JJ Abrams movie. Good but not great.
Looks like he lost a bit of fat and fixed his hair.That photo made me hit up the Google Image Search.
JJ Abrams, 2013, shortly after agreeing to take the job as director of Episode VII
![]()
JJ Abrams, 2015, yesterday:
This movie seems to be taking it out of him a li'l bit.
It's the filmmaking toll equivalent of a presidential term.That photo made me hit up the Google Image Search.
JJ Abrams, 2013, shortly after agreeing to take the job as director of Episode VII
![]()
JJ Abrams, 2015, yesterday:
This movie seems to be taking it out of him a li'l bit.
You see, this is hyperbolic extreme talk and verbiage that's just going to seep into all conversations about SW for the next month regardless of how the movie is.
Star Trek. A 49 year old franchise that hadnt been touched on TV for a few years and whose last movie entries were not great at all. Trek '09 scored higher overall reviews, raked in nearly seven times as much box office wise than Nemesis and managed to capture a sense of fun whilst generally being respectful to the material.
Into Darkness wasnt great but Abrams has been on record numerous times about the issues and semi regrets he had about that. He was earnest and stepping into such a historic franchise invariably would be a delicate balancing act.
Whether you think they are good or bad movies, 'Ruined Star Trek' is hillarious. Yep it wasn't Nemesis. It wasn't Voyagers 'Threshold' or assorted crappy lows. It wasn't numerous choices made on the Enterprise show, not least fucking it's finale sideways with TNG references. It was all JJ - blame him! Hur hur Lens flare!
Some will think it sucks. I foresee the RT meter hovering around 70-75
J J Abrams already ruined Star Trek so I wouldn't be surprised
I hope it's crap, because the meltdowns would surely be much more glorious and entertaining than a "yeah that movie was pretty good".
So you're telling we, NeoGAF is in the profit-sharing deal?It'll make a fuckton of money to soften the blow.
The world will continue to turn.
I think Star Wars fans are used to being disappointed.
That's how I feel. Won't be a classic or anything. But it'll be serviceable and fun.
The thing about JJ Abrams is he's a pretty good director, but he touches projects with such skyhigh potential that I am almost always walking away disappointed anyway.
Then I won't have to worry about all my friends pressuring me into seeing it even though I'd rather not.
Umm... You sure love your silly internet drama.
I would rather watch an entertaining movie but to each his own.
To Data West's point, the live action blockbusters-to-be that HAVE been under Disney's direct creative control include
Tron Legacy
So not only is pointing at Disney to determine Star Wars' quality incorrect, it's not even a good safeguard against mediocrity.
Waiting for this review for sure.