Support NeoGAF

[faridmon]

i didn't used to play lot of games but here it goes

3 out of 4 for Flipping Brownie Brown and also 3 out of 4 for Kōichi Ishii

screw them to hell

I really hate people losing job, especially this gen but i have to say this:
i hope both of them goes out of business for creating either very boring games or broking games.

screw them to hell.

Spoiler

sorry, but i am really mad at them

 

[Red Scarlet]

That's interesting... the success of FFVII and the subsequent changes it ushered in (or seemed to usher in) to the Square lineup left a bad taste in my mouth for Square titles. Alright, it was outright bias, mostly irrational. It had something to do with how much undeserved praise the game got (and I think it's a very good game, by the way) and how people were freaking out nonstop for anything Square-related afterward. Anyway, from that point on, a game from Square had to really prove itself to me.

I didn't really enjoy VS at first, but the more I played, the more I got the hang of the battle system (you have no choice but to use buffs and pay close attention to elemental alliances and other weaknesses) and the more I started to appreciate it. It has a lot of design problems which I've gone on about in past threads, but it's a damn fine game overall.

And it's easily one of the best-looking PS1 games. I don't even know how that's debatable. It looks outright amazing (for the hardware) played on a PS2 with texture-smoothing turned on.

But VS and CC are both games I can understand are polarizing with gamers. It's just interesting that I had the exact opposite of the experience you did. VS gave me faith in Square again.

Yeah, many people consider the PS1 era the "Golden Age" from Square, and it was the complete opposite for me. I really didn't like more than probably 2 games from them that whole time (FFT and FF9 basically).

My whole thing with how I don't like how VS looks is because everything is so up close and zoomed in or something, so it looks like individual pixel blobs are extremely large and that has always looked bad to me. It's like the picture on the right instead of the one on the left, which to me, looks better.

I don't like BIG PIXEL block in my face, and that's what VS looks like (bad) to me.

 

[theMrCravens]

Chrono Cross
Obviously not the worst videogame in history, but seriously the biggest disappointment for me this decade.

Second is:
Hellgate: London
This game had so much potential.
HOW COULD THEY SCREW THIS UP ?

 

[Alphahawk]

Sonic Heroes-This was an ill-advised attempt to retool the Sonic franchise, only problem is it's not a Sonic game at all, it's a shitty beat-em-up that has you going from one enemy bashing party to the next. It is the only Sonic game where a regular enemy takes 5 hits to defeat. The levels are essentially 10 minute excursions in boredom

Turok: utterly generic , also has an aiming reticule that is too loose to be any help at all....;

Spoiler

: Love you bish, please don't ban me kthx

 

[Chittagong]

wrong thread, whoops

 

[vocab]

FFX or FFXII. The only RPGs that really are stuck in my mind because they are completely unbearable to play.

 

[Ninja Scooter]

i think the worst game i played this decade was that shitty Kemco Batman game on Xbox. Even after hearing all the bad press my brother still went out and bought it and sold it to Gamestop the same day.

 

[Vamphuntr]

Chrono Cross
Obviously not the worst videogame in history, but seriously the biggest disappointment for me this decade.

It's not even part of this decade 00-10, it's a 1999 game. And If chrono cross is your biggest disappointement you clearly don't play a lot of games.

 

[Pachinko]

The worst game released from january 1st 2000- december 31st 2009 .... hrmmm

This is tough because I usually just avoid bad games so I can't really make a fair judgement call.

I suppose if I checked which games I've sold because I disliked them in the last 10 years ... I can say the worst game I still own without question is probably Dragonball GT transformation for the gameboy advance. I paid 5 dollars for it because the sprites looked nice , the game reminds me of the past lamest beat 'em up of all time- The Tick for snes/genesis.

Games I've long since parted with though... hmmm. Well I owned Hunter the reckoning on the original xbox for a day and it was crap.

I rented blood wake... also for xbox and it was crap. Perfect dark zero was pretty terrible and I sold it a couple weeks after buying it.

But out of those idono... it's just tough to say for sure what my least favorite game was.

I guess.. if I had to reach here Eretzvaju / evil zone for the playstation 1 was released stateside within that time limit. It was pretty bad. ODT , also for the playstation. sadly it came out in like 98 so it's disqualified.

oh yeah, there's one I played a fair bit of on a rental but it was garbage- Tomb Raider Angel of Darkness. That was a messy awful piece of crap. Easily the worst mainstream game I played in the last 10 years by far.

Award for most time spent on a bad game in the last 10 years- Legend of the dragoon for the PSone. Awful game in just about every way but I nearly finished the damn thing.

 

[DCharlie]

Drake of the 99 Dragons

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQwNf60Vko4

nothing else comes close

 

[cuyahoga]

God Hand

Not the flat-out worst, but pretty bad. Also, a lot of people are confusing "most disappointed" with "worst."

Still haunted this day by that shit, not even Jonny Moseley Mad Trix was that bad.

 

[D3RANG3D]

As far as games I bought expecting greatness, RE5 comes to mind for this year, but I'll have to continue the Devil May Cry 2 beat down. My god what went wrong. I've never been more pissed hours after getting a highly anticipated game.

The Witcher is climbing up that list pretty fast though (I'm only a couple hours in but WTF).

...

 

[Kimosabae]

Brawl. BRAWL, BRAWL, BRAWL.

Piece of shit. Can't be said enough times. The fact that people actually take the game seriously burns my soul.

Halo 2 is a very close runner-up.

 

[mikeGFG]

I love the Gears of War reply on page1.

Classic shitposting

 

[Lindsay]

Sonic Heroes-This was an ill-advised attempt to retool the Sonic franchise, only problem is it's not a Sonic game at all, it's a shitty beat-em-up that has you going from one enemy bashing party to the next. It is the only Sonic game where a regular enemy takes 5 hits to defeat. The levels are essentially 10 minute excursions in boredom

Ohhhh OH! That would be a good choice for me. Sonic Heroes was the first game I ever traded in! I still own Xenosaga but SH? Looooonggg goonneeee. Very bad game and a big letdown being like the first post-SA2 Sonic console game.

 

[IceMarker]

Brawl. BRAWL, BRAWL, BRAWL.

Piece of shit. Can't be said enough times. The fact that people actually take the game seriously burns my soul.

Halo 2 is a very close runner-up.

Apparently you have high standards, I enjoyed both very much, not even close enough to even be considered a "Worst Game of The Decade" award. Eh, but your opinion I guess. :|

 

[jluedtke]

i think the worst game i played this decade was that shitty Kemco Batman game on Xbox. Even after hearing all the bad press my brother still went out and bought it and sold it to Gamestop the same day.

Winner (Loser?)

I did the exact same thing. I was so desperate for a decent Batman game that I bought this, praying that the one review I read was wrong. Wow...worst game ever. Worse than Superman 64. Yeah, it was that bad. I too took it back the exact same day, demanded - and received - a full refund.

 

[Deleted member 8095]

Apparently you have high standards, I enjoyed both very much, not even close enough to even be considered a "Worst Game of The Decade" award. Eh, but your opinion I guess. :|

He mentioned Halo 2 to get a reaction. Just let it go, not worth the effort, trust me!

 

[Kimosabae]

He mentioned Halo 2 to get a reaction. Just let it go, not worth the effort, trust me!

Yes, because if someone doesn't like a game you like, he's clearly a degenerate troll, or plain degenerate!

Shut up. Seriously.

 

[backflip10019]

Brawl. BRAWL, BRAWL, BRAWL.

Piece of shit. Can't be said enough times. The fact that people actually take the game seriously burns my soul.

Halo 2 is a very close runner-up.

Seriously? Brawl was disappointing at the worst and Halo 2 was not bad at all. I would venture to say that it was fucking fun. There are games FAR FAR worse than both of these. You really haven't played worse games than these two? The fuck have you been playing for the past 10 years?

 

[Kimosabae]

Then how many games did you play this decade? I mean, it's not even close to the worst FPS this past decade. I guess my more important question would be, why is this your worst game of the decade? I know I'm just falling into the troll trap, but you should have a pretty fucking good reason for naming a AAA title as your worst game of the decade.

I'm an educated consumer in regards to video games - as is most of GAF. I don't know shit about arcane titles such as "Driven" or "Barbie's New Roller Coaster Conquest 2" on GBA, or whatever.

So, no, relatively, I don't play a lot of games. This isn't a consensus thread - the word "Your" clearly rears its head in the title.

Halo 2 is definitely the worst game I've played next to Brawl - despite their high production values, I consider them both very badly designed games (for my tastes). Obviously, my subjective expectations for these games were generated by their predecessors.

It's fucking sad how hard it is for people on this forum to wrap their heads around how subjective the enjoyments derived from game experiences truly are. Quality production =/= Fun times for all.

 

[Deleted member 8095]

I'm an educated consumer in regards to video games - as is most of GAF. I don't know shit about arcane titles such as "Driven" or "Barbie's New Roller Coaster Conquest 2" on GBA, or whatever.

So, no, relatively, I don't play a lot of games. This isn't a consensus thread - the word "Your" clearly rears its head in the title.

Halo 2 is definitely the worst game I've played next to Brawl - despite their high production values, I consider them both very badly designed games (for my tastes). Obviously, my subjective expectations for these games were generated by their predecessors.

It's fucking sad how hard it is for people on this forum to wrap their heads around how subjective the enjoyments derived from game experiences truly are. Quality production =/= Fun times for all.

Ok, so you hate FPS? Yeah, Halo 2 may have a subpar storyline but the gameplay is solid especially in regard to multiplayer. It may not be your cup of tea but it can't seriously be one of the worst games you played this last decade. I could just as easily say LBP is the worst game I played because it controls like a floaty mess. But even then I'd be lying because I played shit like WWF Raw on the xbox. I tried Circus Maximus. I played Bloodwake a few times at a friend's house. So unless you live under a rock, there is no way Halo 2 or Brawl or Gears of War or Uncharted 1/2 or Modern Warfare should even be mentioned in this thread. So if you are telling me you didn't once play a buggy broken mess at least once during the last decade I'm going to call you out on it.

Edit: Worst =/= disappointing

 

[Gram Negative Cocci]

Drake of the 99 Dragons

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQwNf60Vko4

nothing else comes close

Amen.

All you fools should be forced to play this so you'll know what a bad game truly is.

 

[Red Scarlet]

It's not even part of this decade 00-10, it's a 1999 game. And If chrono cross is your biggest disappointement you clearly don't play a lot of games.

It was mine until VS..and is still #2. I've played a good amount of games the last 10 years too.

 

[backflip10019]

I'm an educated consumer in regards to video games - as is most of GAF. I don't know shit about arcane titles such as "Driven" or "Barbie's New Roller Coaster Conquest 2" on GBA, or whatever.

So, no, relatively, I don't play a lot of games. This isn't a consensus thread - the word "Your" clearly rears its head in the title.

Halo 2 is definitely the worst game I've played next to Brawl - despite their high production values, I consider them both very badly designed games (for my tastes). Obviously, my subjective expectations for these games were generated by their predecessors.

It's fucking sad how hard it is for people on this forum to wrap their heads around how subjective the enjoyments derived from game experiences truly are. Quality production =/= Fun times for all.

Sorry, this explanation still does not warrant the fact that you call Halo 2, which was possibly one of the best console multiplayer experiences the WORST game that you have played in the past 10 years. Seriously, in this case, your opinion is just plain wrong.

 

[Vamphuntr]

It was mine until VS..and is still #2. I've played a good amount of games the last 10 years too.

I'm curious to hear your reasons Red Scarlet. I know you play a lot of games. I can agree that as a sequel to Chrono Trigger that it's disappoint but to be your no 2 worst of the decade .

 

[jonnybryce]

The original Assassins Creed.

You can see everything this game has to offer in under an hour. And you rinse and repeat until the credits roll. It's good looking rubbish.

YES.

I mean, sure. There are definitely hundreds of games that are complete and under shit, Assassin's Creed has a bit to offer. Pretty graphics, some fun stealth...but it's a demo on repeat, sold as a $60 retail game. My worst of the decade, so disappointing, so boring, and pretty generic. OH SHIT THEY SEE ME, LET ME JUMP INTO A HAYSTACK. LOL IM SAFE NOW.

What shit.

 

[Red Scarlet]

I'm curious to hear your reasons Red Scarlet. I know you play a lot of games. I can agree that as a sequel to Chrono Trigger that it's disappoint but to be your no 2 worst of the decade .

I was a huuuuuuuge fan of Chrono Trigger, but I had my doubts about Cross when there was no involvement from "The Big Three" (I have no idea how much involvement they DID have in the original, it may have just been some mental thing). I really liked the "Another World" song, but that was pretty much it for the entire game.

I didn't like the battle system at all with the varying levels of attack and those elemental rings or whatever, I didn't like that I could escape every battle (including boss battles supposedly), how normal battles didn't really amount to much character growth (mainly for loot items after the battle?), made them seem pretty pointless. Also didn't like being able to heal up "for free" after each battle, it kind of made things seem too easy.

I felt no connection to any characters whatsoever, and several of them annoyed the hell out of me. That damn "CHA" guy was the last straw character-wise. I got to some hydra boss about 5 hours in, beat him, then quit. It also did not help that I found the regular battle music to be the absolute worst battle song I had/have ever had the misfortune to listen to (yes even worse than FF2 on the Famicom's).

Then when I heard how they just throw away the main characters from CT (they die or something) I was glad to have traded it in. It was pretty much Strike 2 for me that generation with Square (after Xenogears). There was just pretty much nothing of enjoyment value for me from the game. :/

I was incredibly looking forward to the game and just walked away as disappointed as someone could possibly be. Made me pretty disenchanted with Square's output, but I figured I would try one more game..either strike 3 or awesome. Happened to be Strike 3, but on the bright side I had just started to get back into the Dragon Quest games after pretty much ignoring them for about 6 or 7 years.

Maybe I'm just in a pissy mood or something, I tend to avoid discussion about the games I really don't like, they're pretty much some of the higher regarded stuff a lot of the time.

 

[Sohter.Nura]

I was a huuuuuuuge fan of Chrono Trigger, but I had my doubts about Cross when there was no involvement from "The Big Three" (I have no idea how much involvement they DID have in the original, it may have just been some mental thing). I really liked the "Another World" song, but that was pretty much it for the entire game.

I didn't like the battle system at all with the varying levels of attack and those elemental rings or whatever, I didn't like that I could escape every battle (including boss battles supposedly), how normal battles didn't really amount to much character growth (mainly for loot items after the battle?), made them seem pretty pointless. Also didn't like being able to heal up "for free" after each battle, it kind of made things seem too easy.

I felt no connection to any characters whatsoever, and several of them annoyed the hell out of me. That damn "CHA" guy was the last straw character-wise. I got to some hydra boss about 5 hours in, beat him, then quit. It also did not help that I found the regular battle music to be the absolute worst battle song I had/have ever had the misfortune to listen to (yes even worse than FF2 on the Famicom's).

Then when I heard how they just throw away the main characters from CT (they die or something) I was glad to have traded it in. It was pretty much Strike 2 for me that generation with Square (after Xenogears). There was just pretty much nothing of enjoyment value for me from the game. :/

I was incredibly looking forward to the game and just walked away as disappointed as someone could possibly be. Made me pretty disenchanted with Square's output, but I figured I would try one more game..either strike 3 or awesome. Happened to be Strike 3, but on the bright side I had just started to get back into the Dragon Quest games after pretty much ignoring them for about 6 or 7 years.

Maybe I'm just in a pissy mood or something, I tend to avoid discussion about the games I really don't like, they're pretty much some of the higher regarded stuff a lot of the time.

This is what the problem with Hype is. You just disappoint yourself.

I think anybody who plays Chrono Cross and never played CT to begin with (ahem, I played CC before CT) would enjoy the hell out of the game. Well not anyone, but if you expecting anything like CT is basically a disappointment.

I loved absolutely both games, but I can see where the hate for CC comes from. The characters are somewhat bleak and there's very little connection to CT. But if you go in the game without high expectations I think you can find that CC is mind blowing!

 

[Vamphuntr]

I was a huuuuuuuge fan of Chrono Trigger, but I had my doubts about Cross when there was no involvement from "The Big Three" (I have no idea how much involvement they DID have in the original, it may have just been some mental thing). I really liked the "Another World" song, but that was pretty much it for the entire game.

I didn't like the battle system at all with the varying levels of attack and those elemental rings or whatever, I didn't like that I could escape every battle (including boss battles supposedly), how normal battles didn't really amount to much character growth (mainly for loot items after the battle?), made them seem pretty pointless. Also didn't like being able to heal up "for free" after each battle, it kind of made things seem too easy.

I felt no connection to any characters whatsoever, and several of them annoyed the hell out of me. That damn "CHA" guy was the last straw character-wise. I got to some hydra boss about 5 hours in, beat him, then quit. It also did not help that I found the regular battle music to be the absolute worst battle song I had/have ever had the misfortune to listen to (yes even worse than FF2 on the Famicom's).

Then when I heard how they just throw away the main characters from CT (they die or something) I was glad to have traded it in. It was pretty much Strike 2 for me that generation with Square (after Xenogears). There was just pretty much nothing of enjoyment value for me from the game. :/

I was incredibly looking forward to the game and just walked away as disappointed as someone could possibly be. Made me pretty disenchanted with Square's output, but I figured I would try one more game..either strike 3 or awesome.

Well I get your point. If your a fan of Chrono Trigger the game won't please you much. It didn't help that the game was marketed as a sequel. It's kinda a spinoff. The links to Chrono Trigger are there but they are revealed only at the very end. The growth system was weird, you only gain stat when you gain a star which you get by defeating bosses. It removed the need to grind. Of course If I remember well your a big fan of DQ no? I can understand your complaint. You could also say that double and triple tech were way to much under used (there are like 10 total in the game). The game had it's shortcoming but I really liked the music, the colorful graphic and story. I liked that even if the 40 or some characters would pretty much say the same thing, Square at least gave them accent or speech pattern to personnalize them. Definitly not the GOTY that Gamespot gave it but it was certainly better than some other RPG I played this decade (Xenosaga II and Xenosaga I + II being the worse).

 

[Red Scarlet]

Well, I've been hyped by plenty of stuff and had a blast, although it was pretty much just the next FF or DQ and I can pretty much play any of them no matter what. I went in knowing almost nothing about it (like I try to do with most stuff I know I'm going to purchase), but there wasn't anything I enjoyed out of the final product.

I've got no problem with folks enjoying it, but it was definitely one of those "not for me" type things and I'm fine with it being that way now.

 

[WretchedTruman]

I'm not trolling, it is MY worst game of the decade. It's my own opinion... Isn't that what this thread is all about?

Have you just been sitting at your PC playing Baldur's Gate II for the past ten years? If so, I could see how your standards would be crazy-shit high and that you'd hate everything that didnt have Minsk in it.

If not, you kinda owe us an explanation. No one drops a big name in a thread like this without telling us why. You can if you want, sure, but you'll be labeled a troll.

 

[Sohter.Nura]

Yeah. For me it's different:

It's kinda like me playing Star Ocean 4 right now.

I'm pretty sure that if I had played all the other games I'd be DEEPLY disappointed with SO4, but because I never played the other ones before I'm having a blast.

BTW, SO4 deserves to be on this thread. Very addicting gameplay, but probably the worst characters, voice-acting, plot and whatsoever in an RPG I've played before. I feel like it's the same as watching a Mexican soap opera: It's so cheesy and bad but I squeeze so much joy from it - All the while knowing it's just plain __BAD__.

 

[NaughtyCalibur]

BTW, SO4 deserves to be on this thread. Very addicting gameplay, but probably the worst characters, voice-acting, plot and whatsoever in an RPG I've played before. I feel like it's the same as watching a Mexican soap opera: It's so cheesy and bad but I squeeze so much joy from it - All the while knowing it's just plain __BAD__.

You're only saying this because you haven't played SO3.

 

[Red Scarlet]

Even worse than that Ar Tonelico game? I've only seen that one innuendo-filled cutscene though.

 

[slade]

Halo. I thought that after Metroid Prime, I might just be over my dislike of all games first person. I was wrong. My own mistake for thinking of Metroid Prime like a first person shooter.

 

[jred2k]

Only game I've ever truly regretted buying. I played it for maybe an hour or two and haven't touched it since. I'd trade it in if it had any value, but instead it just sits on my shelf mocking me.

 

[Sohter.Nura]

I'm not sure. Doesn't Ar Tonelico have original voice acting?

I don't think I'd cringe so much from the scenes if it had original VA. Not because I'm saying jap voices are ten times better (but they are), but just because I wouldn't freaking understand what they were saying! It'd just be better if I could read the subtitles and have random gibberish from the characters.

 

[Kimosabae]

Sorry, this explanation still does not warrant the fact that you call Halo 2, which was possibly one of the best console multiplayer experiences the WORST game that you have played in the past 10 years. Seriously, in this case, your opinion is just plain wrong.

And you're a plain idiot.

There's nothing logical here that makes my opinion "plain wrong", however askance from conventional taste it may be. Get your head out of your ass and accept that some people don't like what you like.

 

[Vamphuntr]

Well SO 4 cutscenes/story sequence were awful alright. Well what can you really expect when the cast of characters include 2 teens that are the generic LAST HOPE for humanity, a 14 years old loli with the brain of a 8 years old, a catgirl, a weird cyborg, a mysterious girl with big boobs and a brain deficient birdwoman. Most of them are cheesy anime style scenario : Teen boy spies teen girl in shower, Cat girl is hungry and tries to eat bird woman and so on. Add to that the non sensical main plot and well you have a recipe for disaster.

As for Ar tornelico I only played like 5 hours of the first one and traded it after. It was really shovelware looking. The dialogue in the girls' mind was really cheesy.

I can't believe there is no Xenosaga II in this thread. If I wouldn't have bought Orphen on the launch of the PS2 it would have been my worst game of the decade.

 

[Kimosabae]

Ok, so you hate FPS? Yeah, Halo 2 may have a subpar storyline but the gameplay is solid especially in regard to multiplayer. It may not be your cup of tea but it can't seriously be one of the worst games you played this last decade. I could just as easily say LBP is the worst game I played because it controls like a floaty mess. But even then I'd be lying because I played shit like WWF Raw on the xbox. I tried Circus Maximus. I played Bloodwake a few times at a friend's house. So unless you live under a rock, there is no way Halo 2 or Brawl or Gears of War or Uncharted 1/2 or Modern Warfare should even be mentioned in this thread. So if you are telling me you didn't once play a buggy broken mess at least once during the last decade I'm going to call you out on it.

Edit: Worst =/= disappointing

First bold:

Says you. Compared to Halo 1, 2's multiplayer mechanics are terrible. The auto aim, the large hitboxes, the elites, the lack of a good starting weapon, the lack of fall damage, the watered down weaponry in general - I could go on, and on and on. Sorry you love Halo 2 so much you can't possibly fathom someone finding the game that bad.

But of course, you're probably going to give me some crap about the Match Making system and how polished that is - as if I'm supposed to give two shits if I think the game is terrible in the first place.


Second bold:

I did! They were called "Halo 2" and "Super Smash Bros. Brawl"!

Sorry.

*edit*

For me, worst does = disappointing. Of course, your blind stubbornness is going to try to convince me (and yourself) these can't be synonymous - for very, very arbitrary reasons.

 

[mikeGFG]

And you're a plain idiot.

There's nothing logical here that makes my opinion "plain wrong", however askance from conventional taste it may be. Get your head out of your ass and accept that some people don't like what you like.

Your first post was eye-catching flamebait. Quit backpedaling, your reasoning sucks and so does your taste in games.

 

[Deleted member 8095]

First bold:

Says you. Compared to Halo 1, 2's multiplayer mechanics are terrible. The auto aim, the large hitboxes, the elites, the lack of fall damage, the watered down weaponry - I could go on. Sorry you Halo 2 so much you can't possibly fathom someone finding the game that bad.

But of course, you're probably going to give me some crap about the Match Making system and how polished that - as if I'm supposed to give two shits if I think the game is terrible in the first place.


Second bold:

I did! They were called "Halo 2" and "Super Smash Bros. Brawl"!

Sorry.

Ooook then. Pretty good run if those were the worst two games you played in the past 10 years. I'm done arguing with you.

 

[backflip10019]

Ooook then. Pretty good run if those were the worst two games you played in the past 10 years. I'm done arguing with you.

The kid is obviously a flaming idiot. He's not worth the time.

:lol :lol :lol After a little research, I found this post. Seems like he's a little bit butthurt because the sequels to his favorite games weren't created exactly as he would have liked.

Plus, just searching through his post history, he's a huge fucking dick to everyone. Probably the most negative person that I've ever seen on GAF.

 

[WretchedTruman]

A lot of this bickering would probably be absent if people posted more than just a name or a picture. An explanation as to why someone considers [insert blockbuster title here] their worst game of the decade isn't only logical, it's interesting. Hell, I just may boot up the game again and see if I can empathize with them.

 

[Kimosabae]

The kid is obviously a flaming idiot. He's not worth the time.

You know; I often see GAF as one of the better, more intellectual gaming forums... until I peruse Gaming Discussion for a while.

Seriously, is someone thinking these games are terrible that outside your box?

I've played Melee and Halo 1 competitively - I likely know more about the mechanics of their respective sequels than any of you do, despite the fact that I don't play them. But if it makes you feel better to dismiss me as a "flaming kid", I'll simply utilize my Ignore function and I suggest you all do the same.

 

[backflip10019]

You know; I often see GAF as one of the better, more intellectual gaming forums... until I peruse Gaming Discussion for a while.

Seriously, is someone thinking these games are terrible that outside your box?

I've played Melee and Halo 1 competitively - I likely know more about the mechanics of their respective sequels than any of you do, despite the fact that I don't play them. But if it makes you feel better to dismiss me as a "flaming kid", I'll simply utilize my Ignore function and I suggest you all do the same.

Wow, kid, just stop arguing. I've played thousands of online matches of Halo 2 and ~8000 matches of Halo 3. You don't know the mechanics better than I do just because you played Halo CE in a LAN party against your friends a decade ago.

And I've also played thousands upon thousands of matches of Melee. That and Halo 2 were literally all I played last generation. Your argument is not valid. Based on the information that you have given, there's no way that you can justify your opinion that Brawl and Halo 2 are the worst games of the past decade. Anyway, I'm done arguing with you. Sorry everyone for going off topic there for a few posts.

 

[Kimosabae]

Wow, kid, just stop arguing. I've played thousands of online matches of Halo 2 and ~8000 matches of Halo 3. You don't know the mechanics better than I do just because you played Halo CE in a LAN party against your friends a decade ago.

And I've also played thousands upon thousands of matches of Melee. That and Halo 2 were literally all I played last generation. Your argument is not valid. Based on the information that you have given, there's no way that you can justify your opinion that Brawl and Halo 2 are the worst games of the past decade. Anyway, I'm done arguing with you.

You may have a point regarding Halo (doubtful): while I played the game furiously, I only attended a few MLG tournaments and LAN parties outside my friends (ever heard of TSquared? He lives in Jupiter, FL, less than 50 miles from where I live and I went to LAN parties there) - but, if I've never heard of you in the Melee community - you're a nobody. What's your name.

Posting a link to a thread that has links showcasing my ability to play Melee doesn't help you in the slightest - especially considering you likely have none in response.


*edit*

Your suggestion that I go around the forum "Being a dick to everyone" is a clear attempt to get me banned and should be a bannable offense. Anyone else can simply look at my post history and clearly see that isn't the case.

 

[Captain Tuttle]

Oh my!

 

[pgtl_10]

Super Smash Brothers Melee or Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes