• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

White news anchor uses n-word, gets fired, black anchors does same is spared, sues

Status
Not open for further replies.
A racial-discrimination suit that involves use of the N-word filed by a white, former Philadelphia news anchor may finally be heading to a federal courtroom.

Tom Burlington, an award-winning TV reporter, claims he was fired by Fox29 for using the N-word -- without malice -- during a newsroom meeting, while black employees were not punished for using the same word at the station.

The case has been delayed multiple times. Days before it was supposed to go to trial in January 2011, attorneys for Fox successfully argued that the case should wait until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a similar case. The court ruled in favor of that plaintiff two months later, but Burlington’s suit continued to languish for four more years.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick, noting the case had been stalled long enough, wrote last month in a memorandum that “[w]e will not further delay its resolution by permitting ‘piecemeal review and its attendant delays and waste of time.’ ”

A trial date could be set as soon as Friday, according to court officials. Court records give the following account of the case:

Burlington used the reviled word in a June 23, 2007 staff meeting as Fox reporters and producers discussed a story about the symbolic burial of the very same N-word by the Philadelphia Youth Council of the NAACP. During the mock funeral -- complete with pallbearers, a casket, and a eulogy -- the epithet reportedly was spoken at least 100 time
s.

During the discussion about the story, Burlington, who was scheduled to co-anchor the evening news that night, asked the question that would destroy his career.

“Does this mean we can finally say the word n-----?” Burlington asked. One of the show’s producers, who is black, exclaimed, “I can’t believe you just said that!”

The discussion proceeded. The word was not used on the broadcast that night.

But gossip that Burlington had uttered the word during the meeting immediately rippled through the station. His co-anchor, Joyce Evans, who is black and had not attended the staff meeting, confronted Burlington.

Asked on Tuesday if she had a comment about the case, Joyce Evans said “I have absolutely none.”

Evans remains the anchor of the weekend “Fox 29 News at Six.” The year after Burlington was fired, The Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists named her “Broadcast Journalist of the Year.”

According to the suit, Evans told him, “Because you’re white you can never understand what it’s like to be called a n----- and … you cannot use the word n------.” Evans has denied using the word in her conversation with Burlington, according to court papers.

The next day Evans called the home of the station’s Assistant News Director, Leslie Tyler, who is black. Evans told her about the staff meeting and said that employees were upset over Burlington’s words. Tyler then called the reporters and producers who had been in the meeting but did not call Burlington, according to court papers.

Burlington said he attempted to mend bridges by apologizing personally to several African American station employees. But according to the suit, the apologies weren’t enough for Evans, who was out to get Burlington fired.

She allegedly encouraged fellow employees to denounce Burlington to management. Evans tried to enlist a white coworker to complain because “[t]he only people who have complained so far have been black people,” according to a deposition cited by Judge Surrick.

Burlington was summoned to speak with the station’s Department of Human Resources, Ameena Ali, who is black, and was asked to give his side of the story. Burlington repeated the conversation from the staff meeting, including the epithet he had used.

“Tom, you’re still saying the word; why are you doing that?” Ali responded, according to court papers. This brought the meeting to an immediate end, and Burlington was suspended.

Surrick wrote in last month’s memorandum that an African American employee who was likewise asked to give an account of the staff meeting “used the epithet several times in the email that he sent” to the station’s management. “He was not disciplined.”

On July 3, 2007, Burlington was given a stern warning in writing, informing him that his “behavior was unacceptable and will not be tolerated. You will not be warned again.” The letter ordered Burlington to attend racial-sensitivity training. Burlington immediately scheduled a session.


But soon after, the station’s management began to receive requests from employees that they not be assigned to work with Burlington, saying they were concerned for their safety if they were seen on the street with him.

After attending the racial-sensitivity session on July 6, 2007, Burlington said the company’s counselor told him she did not believe that he “had racial bias or related issues” and declared him fit to return to work. That was not to last.

Evans contacted the station's Department of Human Resources to say she was hearing comments from “people talking to [her] on the street” and said she had concerns about her on-air chemistry with Burlington after his use of the N-word.

Surrick, in a memorandum published in October, wrote that “[t]he evidence suggests that when Evans intervened, the investigation was largely complete and the final determination made that Plaintiff would be put back on the air.”

On July 12, 2007, management told Burlington his contract would not be renewed. Burlington told the the station’s management that it would ruin his career if they terminated him.

According to court papers, the station’s news director, Philip Metlin, who is white, told Burlington that he would “come through this without any problems.” The station’s General Manager, Mike Renda, who is white, told Burlington that their concern for Burlington’s safety was the basis for the decision.

Burlington never returned to the station. He was paid through the end of his contract, which expired on Feb 19, 2008.

Despite 20 years in the business and a resume that includes an Edward R. Murrow Award, he has not been able to find another job in TV news. Burlington now sells real estate on the Main Line.

Burlington’s attorney, reached Monday, sounded relieved that the case might soon be heard by a jury.

“We are very much looking forward to this trial,” said Laura Mattiacci. “We’ve been waiting many years.”

Representatives for Fox29 could not be reached immediately for comment.

When Burlington filed suit in May 2009, he named as defendants News Corporation, Fox Television Stations, Inc. and Fox Television Stations of Philadelphia. The suit seeks unspecified damages.

In his October memorandum, Surrick concluded that there was a “genuine issue” whether FOX Television Stations had been negligent in permitting “its employees’ discriminatory acts” to cause Burlington’s termination.

“[T]his appears to be a case in which management simply rubberstamped the desire of some of Plaintiff’s coworkers [of whom Evans was the most visible] to see him terminated,” Surrick wrote in October.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/S...rd_gets_green_light_.html#5gW4d7RRYV4AoJP2.99

You know...I'm not really sure how I feel about this, I'm kind of on the side of the anchor as what the station was doing was a bit excessive
 

Enron

Banned
This sounds like some bullshit, but seriously who thinks its a good idea to use this word AT WORK outside of a quote? I can't be too mad that the guy got fired.
 
On one hand, they were discussing the word itself, and context is important there.

On the other, according to the article the guy said "CAN WHITE PEOPLE SAY NIGGER NOW LOL" which is not only a stupid fucking joke, it's entirely inappropriate.
 

zeemumu

Member
From the title i thought that the black anchor sued for that reason. But why would you ever think that you would be allowed to say that, especially on air?
 

kirblar

Member
On one hand, they were discussing the word itself, and context is important there.

On the other, according to the article the guy said "CAN WHITE PEOPLE SAY NIGGER NOW LOL" which is not only a stupid fucking joke, it's entirely inappropriate.
Is he referring to "we" as white people or journalists, though? In context it feels like the latter.
 
This sounds like some bullshit, but seriously who thinks its a good idea to use this word AT WORK outside of a quote? I can't be too mad that the guy got fired.

Even if I was quoting someone/something I'd censor myself.

From the title i thought that the black anchor sued for that reason. But why would you ever think that you would be allowed to say that, especially on air?

He didn't say it on the air, he said it in a staff discussion.
 
On one hand, they were discussing the word itself, and context is important there.

On the other, according to the article the guy said "CAN WHITE PEOPLE SAY NIGGER NOW LOL" which is not only a stupid fucking joke, it's entirely inappropriate.
Yeah. The guy was an idiot for saying that.
From the title i thought that the black anchor sued for that reason. But why would you ever think that you would be allowed to say that, especially on air?
It was off air during a meeting.
 

antonz

Member
Guy was stupid but its pretty clear he was railroaded by people with an agenda. Fearing for their life working with him? come the fuck on
 
Honestly given the context of the article he shouldn't have said that.

But soon after, the station’s management began to receive requests from employees that they not be assigned to work with Burlington, saying they were concerned for their safety if they were seen on the street with him.

Is this due to him using the term, or for additional reasons surrounding this? Because if it is just due to his usage of the term in that situation, I don't think I understand entirely.
 
Huh?


I don't even...

I am not understanding this correctly IMO. What is the lawsuit about?

"Tom Burlington, an award-winning TV reporter, claims he was fired by Fox29 for using the N-word -- without malice -- during a newsroom meeting, while black employees were not punished for using the same word at the station."
 
Why risk it at work? I'd rather just say "the n-word" and be done with it.

This country has serious issues.

Walking Dead can have gore porn....but saying fuck? Absolutely not.

Every 12 year old in the country has seen hardcore porn....but a nipple on television? Absolutely not.

You can report on an event where a word is repeated 100 times, but saying the word yourself? Absolutely not.

It's illogical to the point of absurdity
 
Burlington was summoned to speak with the station’s Department of Human Resources, Ameena Ali, who is black, and was asked to give his side of the story. Burlington repeated the conversation from the staff meeting, including the epithet he had used.

“Tom, you’re still saying the word; why are you doing that?” Ali responded, according to court papers. This brought the meeting to an immediate end, and Burlington was suspended.

Looking over everything I think Burlington is a moron, but this is ridiculous.
 

gdt

Member
The funniest thing about that article is that every person mentioned in the story had to be exposed as white or black lol.

And then came Michael Gaffe, who's black.
 
Why risk it at work?

Because hes a (presumably) professional journalist covering a story about the epithet. A story about biology might require using words like penis and vagina. Its clinical and inappropriate. If the guy was acting like an immature douche then its different.
 
No one should be using "Nigger" or "Nigga" in the workplace. Period. The issue isn't that the White reporter got fired. The issue is that ANYONE regardless of ethnicity shouldn't be using that in the workplace.

I mean, come the fuck on.
 
If he said it in the meeting as a joke, that's inappropriate. However, to punish him for saying the word when he was repeating what he said in the meeting is also excessive.
 

esms

Member
I definitely wouldn't risk saying it at work. That said, if I'm discussing the etymology of "nigger" amongst friends, you better be damn sure I'm saying the word. None of that N-word bullshit.
 

888

Member
At this point no one should use the formal word or slang. White or black etc.

To me it sounds like the producer was getting people fired up about it. Pretty sure the anchor will win this one.
 
No one should be using "Nigger" or "Nigga" in the workplace. Period. The issue isn't that the White reporter got fired. The issue is that ANYONE regardless of ethnicity shouldn't be using that in the workplace.

I mean, come the fuck on.

The NAACP used the word in a workplace setting 100 times.

Do you think that was inappropriate?

The conversation is about the word. It makes sense to say the word. It makes sense for a reporter to want to discuss using the word
 

Slayven

Member
“Does this mean we can finally say the word n-----?” Burlington asked. One of the show’s producers, who is black, exclaimed, “I can’t believe you just said that!”

Only an asshole drops a joke like that. If he did, I have no sympathy for him
 

Africanus

Member
No one should be using "Nigger" or "Nigga" in the workplace. Period. The issue isn't that the White reporter got fired. The issue is that ANYONE regardless of ethnicity shouldn't be using that in the workplace.

I mean, come the fuck on.
I am in agreement. Had it occurred in a different fashion, such as a direct quotation, I may have understood. However, I do not believe asking such a charged question is grounds to use the word. While I do not agree with him being punished for repeating the word during a recounting of the events (As I've said previously, direct quotations are acceptable), I also see no reason for his contract having to be renewed if he brought the ire of people upon the company.

In summary, hopefully his life is not ruined over this event, and double standards are indeed injust. Yet, given the circumstances, there is little wrong doing I see on the company's part regarding his treatment.
 

Foffy

Banned
Why risk it at work? I'd rather just say "the n-word" and be done with it.

The fact you'd rather police yourself shows the issue in it. The point is with attitudes like that, it allows this to stay an issue. The policing over a word gives the word its taboo-like qualities. It speaks volumes to the culture we're in, most of all.
 

antonz

Member
I am in agreement. Had it occurred in a different fashion, such as a direct quotation, I may have understood. However, I do not believe asking such a charged question is grounds to use the word. While I do not agree with him being punished for repeating the word during a recounting of the events (As I've said previously, direct quotations are acceptable), I also see no reason for his contract having to be renewed if he brought the ire of people upon the company.

In summary, hopefully his life is not ruined over this event, and double standards are indeed injust. Yet, given the circumstances, there is little wrong doing I see on the company's part regarding his treatment.

The question becomes how did a private staff meeting become so publicly widespread that people apparently feared for their life? Seems someone went out of there way to create a problem to the extent they included the community that was apparently exhibiting violence.

That is the person who should have been fired.
 
The fact you'd rather police yourself shows the issue in it. The point is with attitudes like that, it allows this to stay an issue. The policing over a word gives the word its taboo-like qualities. It speaks volumes to the culture we're in, most of all.

In principle I agree. I'm still not going to say it at work just like I don't say a bunch of shit at work because it's not worth it.
 
Just a little confused here...so the "funeral" was a symbolic funeral for the word "nigger", not "nigga", correct?

Burlington PROBABLY shouldn't have asked if we can "finally" say it. You know, he shouldn't have made that joke at all, if it was supposed to be a joke. A joke about "nigga"--if he's best friends with everyone in the room and all that, maybe. White people shouldn't say either work, IMO.

It likely had a lot to do with his tone or how he delivered the question, to be honest.
 
On July 12, 2007, management told Burlington his contract would not be renewed. Burlington told the the station’s management that it would ruin his career if they terminated him.

Burlington never returned to the station. He was paid through the end of his contract, which expired on Feb 19, 2008.

I don't understand. His contract wasn't terminated, they just chose to not renew. He was even paid through to the end of his contract. Is opting not to renew his contract the same as being fired?
 
Isn't it racist to say that one race can say a word and the other can't because of their race? Especially in this context.

No, not at all. Without going into it (because the appropriation of nigger/nigga literally has volumes written on it), I think it's something that white people (or really, non-black people) shouldn't say. How the black community wants to use it? Leave that up to them. White people just need to move along.
 

Foffy

Banned
No the baggage that comes with it and the fact that it has been and is still being used as a weapon is what gives it its taboo quality.

And by playing silent with the word, you promote it as a word that becomes a weapon. Lenny Bruce covers the point I'm making: words hurt only to the degree you let them, and treating a word as an objectively bad word that should not be uttered is what gives it that so-awful quality. It's not just using it as a put down that makes the word bad, but what we make and do around that word that compounds its uh oh quality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom