No Naked Gun mention on the first page?
I'm out of here.
I was wondering where those types of comedies fit in.
Though maybe those are considered dumb parodies, since they adhere to making fun of a genre or specific film.
No Naked Gun mention on the first page?
I'm out of here.
I can't say for sure, or course, but I'm leaning towards that the moment is still funny in one's memory. I think the act of laughing itself is funny. Like laughing at real life situations, and then laughing again just by being reminded of the experience.
Smart jokes about dumb behaviors/ideas = good
Brain dead jokes about anything = not good
The way I see it; every time one laughs at fiction, someone was clever enough to come up with something you didn't expect.
Yep.
And scary movie 4 was awful. Only 1 and 2 were good.
[...]
So why is it so hard to do these movies right and why is there such a hardline between great and awful?
[...]
3 is solid. 4 is when it started to get bad.
I see nobody has mentioned Kung Pow yet, that movie is still hilarious (minus a few dumb scenes like the cow)
Oh man how could have forgotten that one. I wish they did a sequel, Although i have a feeling they never intended to do so? Much like at the end of History of the world part 1 they showed stuff about a so called sequel in the credits.
Does this count?
![]()
Kung Pow, Dumb and Dumber, The Ace Ventura movies, the first 3 scary movies, H&K White Castle, (I enjoyed the sequels as well) Zoolander, the Austin Powers films, Hot Shots part Duex, and of course Monty Python and Holy Grail (which straddles the line between retarded and genius)
I disagree. The parodies can easily be seen as a special type of dumb comedy.Parodies don't really belong in this thread, at least not the good ones.
Airplane is the opposite of dumb comedy. Yes there was slapstick in there, but it was a deconstruction of disaster movies and the cliches in them. Based on an old film - Zero Hour - which they got the rights to. Whole sections of the original script remained intact. The slapstick was there just to highlight how absurd the genre had become.
It was so well observed that it killed the whole genre of disaster movies single-handed.
Police Squad did the same for police shows, the first Austin Powers for Bond films, Black Dynamite revisited the blaxploitation genre. Galaxy Quest did Star Trek so well that it's better than most of the proper films.
The reason they work is because they love the genre they are parodying, and that makes them clever. To take what people like about the genre, and what works, but turn it on its head.
The king. Zoolander, Hot Rod, Step Brothers, and Tommy Boy all deserve mentions too. Also count me in for the crowd that hated Grandma's Boy. What an awful movie.
Grandma's Boy is awful and doesn't belong in this thread.
Except as an example of awful.
theres a new naked gun being made so good luck with that.
MACGRUBER.. among the most underrated dumb comedies. There, I said it.
![]()
I miss the era when we had over the top, stupid but smart comedies at the same time. What ever happened to making more films like these, Just to name a few...
Mel Brooks was pretty great at dumb comedies.
Weird Al Yankovic did a great job (co-)writing a dumb comedy as well.
Movies like these occur rarely nowadays... which only makes me appreciate them even more.
Mcgrubber. It's in my top 5 comedies all time. So stupid yet so hilarious
Why is it called slapstick?
Ive never watched a comedy and wanted to slap a stick.
Ill be here all week
The name "slapstick" comes from the Italian language word batacchio or bataccio called the "slap stick" in English a club-like object composed of two wooden slats used in commedia dell'arte. When struck, the battacchio produces a loud smacking noise, though little force transfers from the object to the person being struck. Actors may thus hit one another repeatedly with great audible effect while causing very little actual physical damage. Along with the inflatable bladder (of which the whoopee cushion is a modern variant), it was among the earliest special effects that a person could carry.
Parodies don't really belong in this thread, at least not the good ones.
Airplane is the opposite of dumb comedy. Yes there was slapstick in there, but it was a deconstruction of disaster movies and the cliches in them. Based on an old film - Zero Hour - which they got the rights to. Whole sections of the original script remained intact. The slapstick was there just to highlight how absurd the genre had become.
It was so well observed that it killed the whole genre of disaster movies single-handed.
Police Squad did the same for police shows, the first Austin Powers for Bond films, Black Dynamite revisited the blaxploitation genre. Galaxy Quest did Star Trek so well that it's better than most of the proper films.
The reason they work is because they love the genre they are parodying, and that makes them clever. To take what people like about the genre, and what works, but turn it on its head.
I finally got around to seeing it a couple of months ago, and I while I watched it I found it more stupid than funny.
For some odd reason, though, when I look back on it I find the jokes actually being funny in my head, even though I thought they were plain stupid when I was seeing them. It's weird.
I disagree. The parodies can easily be seen as a special type of dumb comedy.
How would you define dumb comedy? A bad movie with horrible jokes and a unique script?
Zoolander