• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Why can't a handheld game win Overall Game of the Year?

Rayman Origins and Guacamelee.
Even though they are existed on ps3 and xbox360 but they are looking better on my PS Vita.
Also, there is Tearaway, one of the greatest 3d games in my opinion.
 
It's not like there's a rule somewhere that prevents a handheld game from winning goty.

But handheld games are victims of their platform. There's a lot of restrictions for what's possible on handheld. This leads to games with worse graphics, simpler gameplay, worse controls and simply less developer freedom to create stuff that will be amazing
 
It's not like there's a rule somewhere that prevents a handheld game from winning goty.

But handheld games are victims of their platform. There's a lot of restrictions for what's possible on handheld. This leads to games with worse graphics, simpler gameplay, worse controls and simply less developer freedom to create stuff that will be amazing

And with preconceptions like that, it's no wonder why a handheld gamer has difficulty winning an enthusiast site's GOTY.
 
It's not like there's a rule somewhere that prevents a handheld game from winning goty.

But handheld games are victims of their platform. There's a lot of restrictions for what's possible on handheld. This leads to games with worse graphics, simpler gameplay, worse controls and simply less developer freedom to create stuff that will be amazing

This is rubbish.

Graphical prowess I will give you when you compare #2058 PC game verse a 3DS or even Vita title, but when was the media darling of the GOTY ever supposed to be a graphical powerhouse?

I could argue that many people will tap Europa Universalis IV on the head as a GOTY and that series is never touted as an icon of graphical ingenuity.
 
It's not like there's a rule somewhere that prevents a handheld game from winning goty.

But handheld games are victims of their platform. There's a lot of restrictions for what's possible on handheld. This leads to games with worse graphics, simpler gameplay, worse controls and simply less developer freedom to create stuff that will be amazing

Let's be honest here, if GOTY awards were based on complex gameplay, neither Jorney nor The Walking Dead would have won this many awards last year. In fact, one could say that about several GOTY winners of the last 8 years.
 
It could, it's just that portable games are generally worse than non-portable ones. I don't want to get into an argument as to why that is the case (since I know there are some rather enthusiastic handheld gaming fans on GAF), but everything from my own experience over cumulative "professional" review scores to things like GAF's overall or genre-specific top lists confirms this trend.
 
What the hell is this post?

And a handheld game can win GOTY and will win several GOTYs this year. Whether that be Fire Emblem, Zelda, or Tearaway they will all be considered. The press knows that both handhelds are quality consoles with great games.

Every year though there are incredible console exclusive AAA titles that take the spotlight. This year was The Last of Us & GTAV... the rest are fighting for scraps.

I don't think anybody is arguing they qon't be considered. They just won't win.
 
Because western gaming media aren't gamers. They are just fluffers for AAA publishers. Fire Emblem: Awakening blew everything out of the water yet it probably won't rack up the awards it deserves.
 
It could, it's just that portable games are generally worse than non-portable ones.
The best portable games have generally less presentation values than the best console games.
That alone is just enough to make it "worse" in the eyes of the press.

That in the handheld business run far less money than on consoles matter too.

It's no mystery that the average scores for the top games on a handheld will always be lower than the average score of the top games on a console.
 
And with preconceptions like that, it's no wonder why a handheld gamer has difficulty winning an enthusiast site's GOTY.

Preconceptions? How is it a preconception to say that worse hardware leads to games with worse graphics and simpler games? And would you really try to argue that the controls on a 3ds or vita are as good or better than the controls offered by a dual shock 4 or xbone controller?

Let's be honest here, if GOTY awards were based on complex gameplay, neither Jorney nor The Walking Dead would have won this many awards last year. In fact, one could say that about several GOTY winners of the last 8 years.

Journey would have never ever won a goty award had it been on a handheld. The graphics, and thus atmosphere would have been greatly reduced, practically ruining what made that game so great.

The Walking Dead I will agree with you on. It's an amazing game that would probably not suffer from being on a vita
 
What the fuck? Am I high right now?

Naw, but I was when I wrote that. That doesn't make it any less true.

It's going to be a long time before a mobile game wins game of the year from a major games media outlet. I mean it took over 60 years for an animated movie to be nominated for an academy award.

I think the manbabies that critique the movie industry are very similar to those that critique the games industry. Mobile games just aren't thought about in the same light as console/PC games.

I'm not saying it's right, but that's the way it is.
 
handheld games seem to lack that nebulous "wow factor". it's the same reason as why you're probably not going to see an indie title win; the big, flashy stuff just comes off as more impressive. does that necessarily make them better games? of course not. but i don't think it's hard to see that the open world of GTAV is going to impress people more than Fire Emblem or Pokemon.
 
It could, it's just that portable games are generally worse than non-portable ones. I don't want to get into an argument as to why that is the case (since I know there are some rather enthusiastic handheld gaming fans on GAF), but everything from my own experience over cumulative "professional" review scores to things like GAF's overall or genre-specific top lists confirms this trend.

The only thing you could possibly be talking about is graphics. There's nothing else that even makes sense when making a statement like this. Handheld games aren't generally worse than console games in any other areas. Online play maybe? That's all I can think of.
 
You know what, this thread could just be about whining, but how about we actually ask? There are people on this board who work at game review outlets.

ATTENTION ALL GAME REVIEWERS ON GAF

Can you ever imagine yourself, or the outlet you work for, giving Game of the Year to a handheld title? Why or why not?
 
Journey would have never ever won a goty award had it been on a handheld. The graphics, and thus atmosphere would have been greatly reduced, practically ruining what made that game so great.

The Walking Dead I will agree with you on. It's an amazing game that would probably not suffer from being on a vita

That wasn't my point at all. I was arguing that "complexity of gameplay" is hardly a factor when it comes to GOTY awards as evident by Journey, TWD and countless others.
 
The only thing you could possibly be talking about is graphics. There's nothing else that even makes sense when making a statement like this. Handheld games aren't generally worse than console games in any other areas. Online play maybe? That's all I can think of.

Also, the general quality of games doesn't really affect how good the best games on a platform are. Super Mario Galaxy isn't a worse game because a majority of the games on the Wii were shovelware.
 
It's not just handhelds... PC games are mostly ignored as well.

Hell, when I looked at the 'VGX' award page earlier I noticed that Dota 2 wasn't even in the 'Best PC game' category. Pretty terrible.
 
Similar to how indie films don't win the Academy Award for Best Picture... bit of snobbery i think when it comes to selecting nominees.
 
I don't get the argument about handheld games being inferior, it's just different. You don't get the shiny graphics but them playing worse is BS.
 
Handheld games run on less powerful hardware, they're generally stripped down versions of their console counterparts, and overall tend to be inferior experiences.

There's no real mystery about it.
 
Stiff competition, that's why. I'd argue Tearaway should be nominated, but it's all subjective. Still haven't decided what I feel is the best game of the year, so many good games came out.

And yeah 3DS has roflstomped it this year. The home consoles aren't even close imo.
Disagree.
 
Can you imagine if Tearaway won (which it won't)? A lot of the people championing ALBW for GOTY would lose it.

Is it really that awesome though, gaf? I haven't got to download the demo yet.

I feel like so many of the people getting angry would be the ones that haven't played it though. Its such an overlooked game, and I've only talked to a few people who really couldn't enjoy the game for what it is.
 
.Can you ever imagine yourself, or the outlet you work for, giving Game of the Year to a handheld title? Why or why not?

Absolutely, yes!

Why not, indeed. A game is a game, the medium isn't a simple one any more, different systems, different control methods.

If it's the best game, it's the best game.
 
So this is basically a "why don't people like what I like" kinda thread. I love playing on my Vita and 3DS but the majority of handheld games can't compare to full on console games, that dosn't mean games like Zelda and Tearaway shouldn't get some recognition though.
 
They're too busy counting their crazy profits than sending some cash to PR dudes to purchase game-of-the-year awards.
 
I was looking though Wikipedia's game of the year awards because I was trying to remember when the last time it happened. I'm sure Wikipedia's list isn't encompassing everyone in the gaming media, but the only organizations to have a handheld title as Game of the Year is Edge all the way back in 1987 with Tetris, and that doesn't even count because while Tetris helped kickstart the Gameboy, Tetris on the game boy didn't come out until 1989 when the system launched.

Edge wasn't around in 1987. Tetris seems to have been included there by virtue of a best games ever retrospective they did at a later date, with the logic that "if there were no better games in 1987, Tetris must logically have been Edge's GOTY".

That, of course, doesn't really factor in that a retrospective is inherently, well, retrospective, whereas Games of the Year tend to be more indicative of the *time* they were selected.

Besides which... much as I like them, Edge is kinda pernickety about handheld titles. I don't recall them ever giving a 10 to a handheld title (Advance Wars got one in a retrospective, but not at the time).

I think that's part of it: Handheld titles tend to be, well, quietly competent. Not big, brash and showy, just, well, good. Which in turn means that they tend not to get noticed among the hoohah of the flashier, noisier titles, and may only get properly appreciated with dedicated play - which, in many cases, journalism doesn't really have the time to give.
 
Owned? Ummmmm I had one of the gameboys, I've used a PSP, Vita, DS, 3DS all for brief stints, it just doesn't do it for me.
Not to shit up the thread but I suspect I'm not the only one who feels like this, they might have some great games but an Uncharted level game, while possible on the Vita, it just doesn't play the way it does on the big screen.

What's the best puzzle game you played in the last year on a home console? The best rhythm game? The best point and click adventure? The best turn-based strategy title? The best rail shooter? The best visual novel?

Mass Effect 2 on 3DS? :/

Elite Beat Agents on Xbox One? Ghost Trick on PS4? Pushmo on PC?

They're different games. Not better, not worse. Just different; and the better games play to the strengths of being on a handheld.
 
Handheld gaming isn't about the crappy B team wannabe-console experiences, there's a lot of games that you only find and/or play better on handhelds.
 
I find it sad that the most likely title Tearaway is gonna win will be "Most overlooked" or "Most underrated" game of the year titles.
 
What is "Overall Game of the Year"?

There is always a "handheld game of the year" where obviously a handheld game wins and other specific "game of the year"(ps3/xbox/wii/etc game of the year), but a handheld game usually don't win the "overall" game of the year, the category that comprehends all games with no distinctions.
I think this is what he meant.
 
It's a shame that games like Fire Emblem: Awakening don't get awarded the big guns but will it detract from your own fun with the game?

No it won't.

Why worry about others opinions if you know it's wrong?

Imma head back to playing mah Wii now, got a re-run of Metroid Prime 2 waiting for me. ;)
 
I know handheld crowd will get upset, but I agree with people that believe it's due to the games being victims of their platforms. It's the whole package, everything considered the same goty contenders on handheld would probably be better on consoles, and are seen as bitesize version of what could potentially be achieved on current consoles.. Super Mario Bros Wii, Mario 3D land are probably the best examples of the shift in expectation, and these games are considered better because if it.
 
I have an irrational dislike of handheld games.
Is it silly? Yes
Is it immature? Perhaps.
Are there more likely? Almost definitely.

I simply don't class it as "serious" gaming, I barely have time to do stuff as it is with just 1 console. I'm sure the game is probably quite good and thoughtful and well designed but I literally don't even see them as consoles, more as toys. It's dumb but........ shrug? that's how I see it.

I think a lot of people don't take them seriously - maybe in Japan it's a different story but the west? nah.

With a few exceptions I used to feel similar (albeit for different reasons) but the Vita and 3DS have turned me around.

I'm not sure whether it's due to a general increase in handheld game quality or just shifting my mindset though. Personally I believe it's the former, and when I look at preowned shelves for older handhelds they're so choked by shovelware frequently the only games of interest are Nintendo ones that everyone owns anyway (preowned shelves always have tons of shovelware, but it's not that absurd on consoles). I admit there's probably some bias there though.
 
It most certainly didn't. Kid Icarus only got that much spotlight last year because of how lacking the platform was otherwise.
Yeah okay. Nevermind that it was one of the most original well-produced game NIntendo's put out in years. It beats most 3DS games this year for me too.
 
Top Bottom