tehbear said:
I think it's stuck in an infinite loop now.
and yet this thread still goes on sigh
Trippy stuff I tells ya.
Don't see why this is such a hot button topic.
Sony screwed up. Simple and easy. Sometimes these companies end up screwed (Atari, Sega) others end up profitable and fine. This generation is lost for Sony yes, but they can come away from it learning something.
And maybe even have a comeback party as soon as next gen. $299 PS4 in 2010... methinks it's likely. And something I wouldn't mind picking up.
garrickk said:
I gave up by the end of 2002.
The other systems had... what's the word... momentum.
The Xbox and PS2 strongly in America, the PS2 huge in Europe, the Xbox having a presence, and the GCN stagnant. Japan was nearly just as bad off. The GCN never looked like it was ever going to have a presence there, sure the Xbox did worse, but when one competitor is sitting at 20 million, one at 4 million, and the other at (500,000?). You can't call them a success of any form.
The only thing Nintendo did right with the GCN was making it as profitable as possible.
Now I've no doubt the Wii has this "war" won just because of the momentum it has, I never thought the GCN would ever stand. The same market forces at work with the GCN last gen are at work on the PS3 this gen, just in different areas. It all boils down to momentum and mindshare.
The $599 pricepoint has become a defining characteristic of that console. Just like Fisher-Price became the unshakable staple of the GCN $599 has become the staple of the PS3. It will always be viewed as too expensive because of that. Any price difference between the PS3 and 360 will be considered too much.
I've kind of ranted so I should end this by saying, it's ok to be on the losing side. As long as the experiences are what counts you'll find it worth it. You'll get games on the PS3 that won't be seen anywhere else.
Just like the GCN in the end was worth it.