This is in no way meant to start a childish 'war' of some kind, but instead is a legit query I need clarified.
I remember a time.. long, long ago, where the PS3 was touted to be a powerhouse of some sort, generating '1000fps' at '3080p', producing graphics to rival Pixar and to render time and space in 4D and all it's glory.
Exaggeration on my part indeed, but after all this time, why are the 'hardcore' consoles so similar in the output of graphics?
Is it a case of 3rd party developers not upsetting another console maker thus creating similar productions?
Is the hardware used on each console equally similar?
Or was it just another hyped up promise that fell through?
Questions, questions......I need answers!
I remember a time.. long, long ago, where the PS3 was touted to be a powerhouse of some sort, generating '1000fps' at '3080p', producing graphics to rival Pixar and to render time and space in 4D and all it's glory.
Exaggeration on my part indeed, but after all this time, why are the 'hardcore' consoles so similar in the output of graphics?
Is it a case of 3rd party developers not upsetting another console maker thus creating similar productions?
Is the hardware used on each console equally similar?
Or was it just another hyped up promise that fell through?
Questions, questions......I need answers!