xxracerxx said:So why don't they move the camera around then is my question?
At least now we see where the hawk comment came from.
They did.
xxracerxx said:So why don't they move the camera around then is my question?
At least now we see where the hawk comment came from.
I know, that is why I responded to the guy right after me. I was mistaken. I just wasn't done as much as I would have liked._Isaac said:They did.
It's good to want things. Getting those things is another issue.Heavy said:Wasn't impressed at all by the bird demo... thought it was really bad. I want Epic Samaritan level graphics for my next-gen console, or near them.
jetjevons said:
Thanks! That looks incredible. I can't believe people claim it's not beyond the PS360. Nothing (yet) guarantees WiiU will be able to pull this off in games, but this demo most certainly is beyond any game on any platform, including PC (yes, The Witcher 2 too). The blossoms alone are enough of a tell. Call it bullshit or whatever else if you're so inclined, but saying it's 360 level is just laughable or at the very least shows the person saying so is half blind and should have been happy with the Wii too instead of join the hate wagon.jetjevons said:
Truth101 said:I know we're talking about your video already, thanks for taping it.
jetjevons said:Ah. Gotcha.
To answer a question posed earlier in this thread while the demo was running you could i) use the analog stick to shift the angle of the camera displaying the on-screen image and ii) move the Wii-U controller around in 360 space like a virtual window into the environment.
"Have to have people in the shot if you're taking video."jetjevons said:
Thanks. That looks really great.jetjevons said:
jetjevons said:
big_z said:360/ps3 can handle the gamcube nature demo with ease it is not impressive anymore. the wii u nature demo is nothing impressive either, looks current gen.
=HERO= said:They don't do it a lot, but they move it around during the "press b" scene by the koi lake.
Definitely amazing seeing the full version. It's soooooo weird that so little of the graphical power that this system has was shown off, despite clearly having at least some advantage, if not quite an advantage over PS3/360.
In reality, this was a reference to his earlier comments about Unreal Engine on the 3DS. Back in March in an interview with Joystiq, Rein said "The second Nintendo releases a piece of hardware that can run our engine well, we'll be on it like water on fish."RT @Michael_French @MarkRein So that means you're supporting Wii U? <--No announcement to make today but let's just way "Water meet fish"
big_z said:360/ps3 can handle the gamcube nature demo with ease it is not impressive anymore. the wii u nature demo is nothing impressive either, looks current gen.
That entire demo reminds me of Shenmue.
Pocks said:I know I've said this 2 or 3 times in earlier threads.. but it bears repeating that this demo was created on early dev equipment. Reggie emphasized this in his interview with Geoff.
I can't wait to see what developers can create on the final hardwire a couple of years down the road.
amstradcpc said:If we have learned something about console hardware development in that early kits are always downgraded in final consoles.
big_z said:360/ps3 can handle the gamcube nature demo with ease it is not impressive anymore. the wii u nature demo is nothing impressive either, looks current gen.
Kozak said:When the fuck did we learn this LOOOOOOL
Let's not go overboard here, palAlextended said:Nothing (yet) guarantees WiiU will be able to pull this off in games, but this demo most certainly is beyond any game on any platform, including PC (yes, The Witcher 2 too). The blossoms alone are enough of a tell.
Where did I go overboard? I'm just out of playing The Witcher 2 and, while I can't run it sufficiently at max settings, I've most certainly checked out a lot of it with such, and it's nowhere near that level of detail. I mean, the awful foliage alone is enough of a difference when this demo goes to nearly microcosm level of detail. You could at least back up what you're saying with a screenshot and if there's a PC game so pretty that I've yet to see I'd certainly concede that, yes, that one's close, or better even.slopeslider said:Let's not go overboard here, pal
The Witcher 2 is not the pinnacle of pc gaming, I don't know why everyone keeps bringing that game up this E3Alextended said:Where did I go overboard? I'm just out of playing The Witcher 2 and, while I can't run it sufficiently at max settings, I've most certainly checked out a lot of it with such, and it's nowhere near that level of detail. I mean, the awful foliage alone is enough of a tell.
Alextended said:Thanks! That looks incredible. I can't believe people claim it's not beyond the PS360. Nothing (yet) guarantees WiiU will be able to pull this off in games, but this demo most certainly is beyond any game on any platform, including PC (yes, The Witcher 2 too). The blossoms alone are enough of a tell. Call it bullshit or whatever else if you're so inclined, but saying it's 360 level is just laughable or at the very least shows the person saying so is half blind and should have been happy with the Wii too instead of join the hate wagon.
I think something's wrong with your understanding of English. My use of it isn't the best, but I think it's pretty decent. I didn't contradict myself anywhere. People said this particular demo looks so so, 360 level, whatever else. I don't know if games will look this good on Wii U and I make that clear. I'm also not saying Wii U games will NOT look like this. I don't have a time machine you see, so I can't promise you anything about its games. What I said is that the demo, as shown, which is what people discussed and what I'm discussing here, is beyond any actual game I've seen, contrary to what others have stated, and maybe save for Epic's own recent tech demos (which aren't actual games, yet, so are not applicable to my statements). That's all I'm saying. Feel free to disagree. Ask Nintendo what the point of the demo is, I don't care, I spoke of what I saw only.bigben85 said:So much contradiction. If games like The Witcher 2 aren't even comparable, I fail to see a console (Wii U!) being able to go anywhere near it in a game. So, what is the point of the demo? Just because other consoles don't have prettier demos don't mean they aren't capable of it.
Alextended said:I think something's wrong with your understanding of English. My use of it isn't the best, but I think it's pretty decent. I didn't contradict myself anywhere. People said this particular demo looks so so, 360 level, whatever else. I don't know if games will look this good on Wii U and I make that clear. I'm also not saying Wii U games will NOT look like this. I don't have a time machine you see. What I said is, the demo, as shown, which is what people discussed and what I'm discussing here, is beyond any actual game I've seen, save for Epic's own tech demos (not games, so not applicable to my statements). That's all I'm saying. Feel free to disagree. Ask Nintendo what the point of the demo is, I don't care, I spoke of what I saw and of people's comments for what I saw.
So you more or less agree with me. I'm glad. That's all I did too, stated the obvious, vs people claiming otherwise. See ya.bigben85 said:of course the impression is that it is 100 times beyond any games out there or coming.
Which makes sense because its a next gen machine.iamaustrian said:It shocks me deeply that people say this is not over PS3/360 level.
basicly everything in that demo blows this-gen stuff out of the water.
Woah. Nintendo, or whichever development studio put this together, need to release a direct feed HD video of this. Looks superb and so much better than the low quality live stream.jetjevons said:
Necromanti said:It boggles my mind that there are people who still say that the Wii U barely struggles to meet par with current-gen standards.
They should, I want to see what it really looks like.Ydahs said:Woah. Nintendo, or whichever development studio put this together, need to release a direct feed HD video of this..
For me it's the DoF.Necromanti said:I think what impresses me the most in both this demonstration and the Zelda tech-demo are the small details that add so much, like the lighting and particle effects. It boggles my mind that there are people who still say that the Wii U barely struggles to meet par with current-gen standards.
How would being able to control the bird AND the camera convince you more than the camera alone?bigben85 said:Maybe it really isn't that impressive for some people? If it had any sort of interaction I would be impressed. And no, being able to move the camera around isn't enough (other than proving it being real time). I have never gone crazy over non interactive demos. The early PS3 tech demo, the early unreal tech demo...they were not indicative of real game graphics achievable.
JaskoX1 said:Can you imagine fishing in Lake Hylia now?