- Mar 12, 2009
The actual component costs would only be a $20 difference but look at PSN prices vs physical versions. The physical prices drop way faster. So they'd be selling way more games at full or near full price on the digital system. Then you factor in that there's no retail cut on any of those sales. Then factor in that there's no used games sales on that version. It makes long term profits much more assuredWhat bothers me about the idea of a digital at $399 is that it's too much of a drop for a lack of disc drive. 100USD for a disc drive is absolutely ridiculous.
I don't think they'll lower the capacity either.
They should throw in 6 months of PLUS or something to the more expensive model to justify it if they'll separate pricing by 100 dollars.
It's a tough needle to thread.
I think the slim was $299. That was the first big Kevin Butler adnot until the end of the gen also they had to cuT the price and take out ps2 bc. The ps3 didn’t take off until they released the slim model and was I think 400-350$. Had they not cut costs the ps3 very likely could have failed.
I will let you in on a little secret. Today's investor is not waiting 4 years on a return on investment so you can score warrior points. Sony makes 8 more dollars on digital games vs retail. That is 7 games to make up that 50 bucks or most of a generation for a lot of gamers. Sony does not need to under cut Microsoft ffs you warriors don't need to win every talking point. Sony has mind share and the EU they are not desperate like Microsoft people.The actual component costs would only be a $20 difference but look at PSN prices vs physical versions. The physical prices drop way faster. So they'd be selling way more games at full or near full price on the digital system. Then you factor in that there's no retail cut on any of those sales. Then factor in that there's no used games sales on that version. It makes long term profits much more assured
A disk drive does not equal 100 dollars. You 399 people are smoking some GOOD drugs todayMessaging is going to be key for Sony. If they price at $399/$499, people will inevitably ask why the DE is $100 more than the Series S, not knowing that Series S is a less powerful machine while the PS5 DE is just a diskless PS5 with all the same internals.
Sonys chip is working on much higher frequency (If previous RDNA generation is any indication then almost on chip max frequency) which makes producing chips way more expensive. MS also can repurpose partially not working chips to make XSSes. Sony need to throw them away. I think PS5 APU can be more expensive to produce at the end especially because XSS exists.
Dang out of nowhere.
Sounds like most people's predictions
I wouldn't spend half a grand on a gaming console for my daughter. Now I game of course so that changes things. From a non gaming parent point of few.. $499 is a lot for a video game system.
I see what you're saying, I think Microsoft would also be happy to sell these two primarily PlayStation 5 owners as a secondary Game pass console. They are definitely trying some new things, time will tell if those are good or bad.I should have acknowledged that and clarified my statement a little because I get that; I was asking that question with people who post here in mind. Most of us, who are getting the Xbox will get the Series X. I know it's a good option price wise. But to offer a different point of view, most people who wouldn't spend half a grand likely wouldn't be the first to upgrade to a new console when they can get current gen consoles with a vast library probably even cheaper now given this will be $299.99. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I would be surprised if current gen console prices aren't lowered.
512gb, 825Gb and 1tb what difference does it make? PC and game consoles you still need more space so we all will need external storage which hasn’t been uncommon now for the last 10 years.The 512GB SSD is gonna be a shitshow. I love the 299 pricing but games this gen already are blooming up to insane sizes. After OS etc I would imagine about 350 GB will be usable space. On a digital only console.
And its not even like you can plug in a USB external drive this time.
I still think I might get it though. At 299 its cheap enough to push off my plans of upgrading my PC for another 2 years or so. I was gonna do it next year but the only AAA games I play on it are Apex, Rainbow Six and CSGO. All of them are giving me 150 FPS as it is.
The sport model of a car might be $10,000 more than the regular model.
I wouldn't worry about that. 5700XT can be overclocked to ~2.2GHz with skyrocketing power consumption but still it's possible. RDNA2 is supposed to be more power efficient so that frequency is even more obtainable. I wonder what is power budget for PS5 and how much it will cut GPU speed to keep it.IMO the main question is how its going to handle, the base 5700 is up to 1750 MHZ, 2250 MHZ on PS5 would really be a unseen step. I think the cost went on the cooling solution.
God thing then, that you are not in place of Sony. I hope you are not running any business.If I was Sony I'd sell the disc version for $525. That would make it look like the superior console.
And then the digital for $450, so it's still the same machine without the disc drive and even cheaper than the "lesser" X.
Best thing would be digital for 199 and disc version for 299, imagine all those sales ! Just imagine , it would literally be unstoppable. To bad there are old share holders with old principle and small minds .To be honest the best thing sony can counter Microsoft is making the physical and Digital the same Price say at $350 dollars considering that ps5 DE has the same power as the disk version or $499 for disk version and $350 for PS5 DE so in my money it would be £300 pound and i think its £400 pound that should compete with Series S
Dude I am not suggesting that Sony needs to undercut MS. But you have to think if Sony given the current situation can give MS a blow like that it will be over for XSX. And I really don't think BOM is that high for either console. Selling at a loss of lets say 10% is huge. A BOM @ 500 means that retail price should be in the 799 region at least. If a console sells for 499 retail then it probably has an estimated BOM around 350 tops.Taking a 150 dollar plus loss not a problem? The BOM is 450-550 plus shipping and retail cut. Why would the undisputed market leader with super mindshare need to under cut anyone with limited supply lol.
This would make the XSS DOA if 100 bucks more could get you the XSX.
It wasn't a war starting statement. If you don't know what it is then why bait people by pretending you did? You stated it in an objective manner in order to start a flame war, what I said was extremely tame in comparison to the nonsense you post on here.at this point everyone is exaggerating the price point for the PS5 because know actually knows it. You reply to my quote saying “please stop the console war junk” yet you reply with a ridiculous line then reply again with another war starting statement. Your a clown that’s all you are. Am I clown too? Dam straight I am.
Do you not have a current gen console? Cause can't you just play games on those if you don't care about graphics
Says he's not starting a console war but came into this thread exaggerating about the PS5 price... I love how you basically had no response to anything I actually said besides the last line, hence why I said it in the first place.
That's only because it's the truth. Microsoft made the Xbox One $
Baiting people hahaha. You’re a cook show bud. I legitimately think that’s how it’s gonna go down and if your taking this much offence to what I’ve said. That proves you’re a flaming Sony boy as I’m a flaming Xbot.It wasn't a war starting statement. If you don't know what it is then why bait people by pretending you did? You stated it in an objective manner in order to start a flame war, what I said was extremely tame in comparison to the nonsense you post on here.
I don't expect much sense from console warring fanboys, though.
Wonder how low they will go with the series x. Exchange puts it at 658, would they go 600 or 650? 650 would definitely push me more towards the sFor any Canucks, It's $380 CDN.
Nice price. At the current exchange rate it should be $396. Or just round up to $399.99.
Instead they rounded down about $20 to $379.99.
You are right BUT you also are selling a product with less functionality that people will need to buy directly from you instead of retailers thus giving you higher profit margins which allows you to sell for cheaper then just removing the UHD drive.
You asked why, if the Series X is $500 and the S is $300, why wouldn't they just get the X.
The Series S gives people access to the library (such that it is), is a replacement for the One S, and is very aggressive on price which makes sense in a world of a government-caused collapse of the economy. Not going to do that Dodgeball meme but we've never seen a company approach a new gen of console in this way, so who knows if it will work.
On the other hand, you look at something like the iPhone lineup, and the base phones are always the best selling. I mean the difference between the PS4 and PS4 Pro were pretty easy to see but the PS4 Pro was only about 20% of the market. My guess is the One X is a little higher but most of the sales are almost definitely One S.