Brewster's Wallet
Member
Witcher may be the better series, but I had much more fun playing the Mass Effect series. Was my favourite of the last gen
Why do so many people have to be boring and not pick one? Who cares if they are different? Does that mean we can't say Uncharted 4 is better than E.T because they are completely different?
Anyway, as a series I am going with Mass Effect on this one.
Mass Effect.
No matter what, Shepard/Future character will always be your character, Geralt will always be Geralt.
Also all 3 ME games are great, only Witcher 3 is good the rest are shit.
Pretty surprised by the thread. From what I read when ME3 was released, I would have thought Mass Effect 3's ending retroactively made the series trash. Opposite for Witcher 3 which retroactively made the series the best thing ever along with CDPR.
So I am not an RPG guy most of the time. I am gameplay first guy so the RPGs I like are Souls games and games like Deus Ex HR. However, I want to broaden my tastes and immerse mysel in a world and push myself to complete a well known RPG series.
I've played Witcher 3 for about to 10 hours and I felt like I watched about 4 hours of cutscenes and since I wasn't that invested in the characters or story I was a little bored. I felt I needed to play the whole series. Same thing for Mass Effect. I played 2 and liked it but I wasn't that invested in characters or story.
Does Mass Effect do a good job of making your choices matter trough three games? That would be pretty cool
I feel it's designed to be experienced standalone. It does continue the overall storyline, but it's fairly disconnected from the old games and is more or less self-contained. That is to say, any returning players would probably feel the same about the characters and the story, especially in the first hours of the game.
As for the question in the thread title, it's Witcher all the way for me. I remember being massively dissapointed when Mass Effect came out. A Bioware fan at the time, I got a safe retread of KotOR and Jade Empire (already a complete clone of the former, scenario and story wise) with janky TPS combat. It was just so bland and empty. Mass Effect 2 wasn't an improvement for me since none of the storylines were particularly satisfying, so I gave up about 20 hours in. I do need to go back and finish it at some point though.
Whereas The Witcher games are just great all around. The first one is a competent, if a bit tedious RPG. The second made a few compromises and sacrificed some RPG complexity and scale in order to tell a tighter, more dramatic story. The third is just perfection, an impossibility: a 200+ game with little filler, great story with lots of twists and turns, an open world that is really fun to explore.
I'd say that the first two games are not really necessary, even though they are enjoyable in their own right. Stick to TW3, get out of White Orchard and it's very likely that the game will click with you. Basically, you'll find yourself in the middle of a HUGE world with very little direction and lots of things to do (including lots of monster fights!). The cutscene to combat/walking around ratio will also be MUCH lower if you're bothered with that.
Somewhat related: I love Witcher 3, and want something similar for PS3 or PS4. Anything worth getting? Skyrim is out of the question due to all the bugs, and I don't really like the sorta kinda isometric view in Dragon Age.
Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, it runs a bit slow on PS3 but can even be considered a better game than the witcher. At least in the combat department is miles ahead of most games out there.
Somewhat related: I love Witcher 3, and want something similar for PS3 or PS4. Anything worth getting? Skyrim is out of the question due to all the bugs, and I don't really like the sorta kinda isometric view in Dragon Age.
Yea I think I would like Witcher 3 more if I knew characters better... I would be more into it because it starts so story based. As of now it has a beautiful world but the character movement is so janky I get annoyed easily. I figure if I'm going to appreciate these games it will be for world, story and characters and playing whole series I imagine will benefit that endeavor. If I find some good gameplay it will be icing for me because I ain't finding it in Witcher 3 ( I mean it's ok but I can't imagine doing it for 200 hours).
Mass Effect starts off amazing and ends up being pretty average ( 1>2>3)
Witcher is the opposite, and 3 is the best in the series.
Just my opinion of course. As for which to play, they're both excellent, but I'd lean more towards Mass Effect as the quality over the whole series is a pretty high standard. Witcher 3 is worth playing for the story though.
There's nothing in the same vein that's near it's quality. I recommend buying the expansions if you don't have the expansion pass already. HoS is just as good as the main game and B&W looks to be even better.
Edit: New Vegas might be the closest, but that's pretty buggy too.
Mass Effect.
No matter what, Shepard/Future character will always be your character, Geralt will always be Geralt.
Also all 3 ME games are great, only Witcher 3 is good the rest are shit.
There's nothing in the same vein that's near it's quality. I recommend buying the expansions if you don't have the expansion pass already. HoS is just as good as the main game and B&W looks to be even better.
Edit: New Vegas might be the closest, but that's pretty buggy too.