Thank God I love all the directors mentioned.BattleMonkey said:Almost none of the post have anything really to do with the OP or topic of weekend box office. Bunch of stupid mud slinging.
Thank God I love all the directors mentioned.BattleMonkey said:Almost none of the post have anything really to do with the OP or topic of weekend box office. Bunch of stupid mud slinging.
Cameron is always related when it comes to Box Office threads :loljett said:The difference is this thread has nothing to do with James Cameron.
BattleMonkey said:Almost none of the post have anything really to do with the OP or topic of weekend box office. Bunch of stupid mud slinging.
Thats not the point here though, I'm pretty sure a good chunk of the posters arguing like both of them,JGS said:Thank God I love all the directors mentioned.
OK, I just felt the need to defend Cameron.irfan said:Thats not the point here though, I'm pretty sure a good chunk of the posters arguing like both of them,for different reasons.
JGS said:OK, I just felt the need to defend Cameron.
Man you crazy. Shutter Island was a great movie.jett said:The quicker Shutter Island is forgotten the better.
.mckmas8808 said:Man you crazy. Shutter Island was a great movie.
JGS said:I always [try to] watch movies for the story which is why I didn't care too much for District 9.
Avatar had a great story that was less paint by the numbers than Hurt Locker (Although I liked it too)
shutter island was shit. Had tons of illogical loop holes and was predictable.mckmas8808 said:Man you crazy. Shutter Island was a great movie.
What? Did I offend for District 9 or Hurt Locker? Surely not both?vooglie said:I know opinions are opinions but honestly I don't even...
mckmas8808 said:Man you crazy. Shutter Island was a great movie.
Dead said:Weekend actuals are in
http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/
Avatar is playing in 2 theaters, 3543 less than Inception, but its Per Theater Average is only $1000 less than Inception, and higher than the PTA of movies 3 through 20 in the Top 20
PhoenixDark said:Really shows how poor Inception has performed, once you get past the smoke and mirrors.
Was going to see it last week but I had a feeling it would manage to stay on top of the box office. I'll see it this week to commemorate its fall from grace
Do you ever stop being a douche?PhoenixDark said:Really shows how poor Inception has performed, once you get past the smoke and mirrors.
Was going to see it last week but I had a feeling it would manage to stay on top of the box office. I'll see it this week to commemorate its fall from grace
PhoenixDark said:Really shows how poor Inception has performed, once you get past the smoke and mirrors.
Was going to see it last week but I had a feeling it would manage to stay on top of the box office. I'll see it this week to commemorate its fall from grace
jett said:Keep an eye on Chinner and Phoenix Dark, Solo. That's the kind of joke character you're becoming in Nolan-related threads.
AvidNobody said:Better than any cameron action scene ever ever ever
Chinner said:The people criticizing Inception are suffering from penis envy of just how amazing Nolan is. I'm not surprised though - this is a internet forum and people are bound to be emotionally invested in things so emotions are bound to run high.
I can sympathize though; you know theres going to be jealously when Nolan single handily beats the great directors who have made modern cinema; I'm talking about directors such as Spielberg, Scorsese, Scott, Hitchcock, Allen, Kubrick, Cameron, Coppola, Leone, Verhoeven, Tarantino, Jackson, Wachowski and Fincher. I mean this guy has come along within the last 20 years and utterly destroyed them. All you have to do is look at public opinion and everyone agrees; Inception is already at no#3, and when you consider that The Godfather and The Shawshank Redemption are utterly overrated, then you do realize that Inception is in fact the best film ever made.
Is this surprising though? The Dark Knight was an huge success, and if it wasn't for TDK Avatar would of been no where near as successful as it was. Critics agree that IMAX ticket prices and camera technology influenced Avatar. Hell, even James Cameron says it: "I was directly influenced by The Dark Knight".
Inception is the remaking of films as we know it. Inception shows us that films and hollywood don't need to treat us as idiots anymore. Films CAN be unnecessarily complex and still be successful. Obviously, some of the film critics are finding it hard to accept evolution. Forum posters such as Solo critique Nolan for his poorly directed action scenes and characters that lack depth. This may seem logical at appearance, what posters like Solo do not realize is that Nolan is treating the viewer with logical respect. Think about it; When Nolan directs a movie he directs with the view that the viewer is actually IN the movie; when you keep this in mind, the average viewer is not a soldier, if any of us were to be placed in an battlefield we would not be able to coordinate and participate because we lack experience - this is WHY we can't see whats happening in Nolan's action sequences.
A equal explanation can be given for why Nolan's characters lack depth. Look at it from what we've learned from above; although Nolan directs films as if the viewer was there, he doesn't direct it as if the viewer was INVOLVED with the events. Now take this and look at Nolan's characters. If I was in Inception, I'm sure as hell no one would be talking to me, and shit man I can't read minds. I wouldn't be able get to know anyone because everyone will be sleeping. This kind of cinema is utterly logical yet so perfect and moist at the same time.
What holds the future for Nolan and cinema? For those who keep up to date with Nolan news, Nolan is going 3D. Nolan says that this will allow him to reinvent cinema as we know because he will be able to finally give characters the depth they deserve.
Solo said:I love how not agreeing with your opinion makes someone a joke character. If that were true, you'd be the funniest fucker on NeoGAF :lol
All I do is state my opinions and give reasons as to why. Deal with it.
"Let's see Nolan make a second original to gross over $150 million worldwide before we deify him," said David Poland of Movie City News. "What comes of this premature deification is the tear-down when his film after the next 'Batman' doesn't do massive business or just isn't what his rabid fans expect. Not pretty when it happens, and no one of this talent level deserves it."
I think he's in Stage 1: denial. I think "anger" will be even more entertaining.DMczaf said:If you want to talk about "umad", here's one of the NY critics talking about Inception's success
"Well...Inception was always going to be a mega hit! Now the REAL question is what his next movie does!"
harSon said:At least a fair chunk of those who have gone against the grain, have typically backed their viewpoints up rather substantively. That's all you can really ask for. I could throw out hyperbole-ridden fragmented sentences, backed with nothing more than a picture as well, but I figured people would appreciate something a bit more intellectual.
Scullibundo said:Yeah I don't think anybody in here has been saying Nolan sucks. I'm pretty sure everybody in here likes the guys films. There just seem to be people who have their lips puckered so close to his ass cheek, that the brown eye they're pressing their ear up against means that any time they hear a gasp of air in the form of a new post, they expect it to be somebody talking shit.
thekad said:There are two Inception threads you could have spammed with your blog. This is a box office thread. The only reason Solo and co. are in here is because, yes, they mad.
Scullibundo said:Yeah I don't think anybody in here has been saying Nolan sucks. I'm pretty sure everybody in here likes the guys films. There just seem to be people who have their lips puckered so close to his ass cheek, that the brown eye they're pressing their ear up against means that any time they hear a gasp of air in the form of a new post, they expect it to be somebody talking shit.
jett said:Rich coming from the guy saying that Aliens is one of the best scripts ever. Why don't you tell us how awesome James Cameron as a screenwriter is again.
harSon said:Have you actually read the screenplay? It's almost literature like in its execution.
jett said:Is this sarcasm? I watch movies, I don't go around reading their screenplays.
I do love me some Aliens(theatrical edition, cough cough), but not for the writing(other than the funny one-liners anyway).
jett said:Is this sarcasm? I watch movies, I don't go around reading their screenplays.
I do love me some Aliens(theatrical edition, cough cough), but not for the writing(other than the funny one-liners anyway).
harSon said:Then what business do you have commenting on the film's script?
Scullibundo said:Oh ma' jett. You disappoint me so. And yes, the Aliens script is masterful in its design. It should be mandatory reading for any screenwriter.
jett said:I guess commenting on Inception's script is off-limits now!
Gimme a fucking break.
harSon said:Don't get mad at me because you commented on something you have absolutely no clue about.
vooglie said:Jett's talking about the stuff that you hear and see, why are you playing ignorant? You don't have to have read the script to say that the dialogue sucks.
The script would be worse because Cameron would never give up control. So another writer would wind up writing what Cameron would have wrote anyway but not as good!gdt5016 said:I too would like to see Cameron bring someone in to help with the scripts.
In fact, Cameron should handle pretty much everything (dude can pace and build a movie like a genius) but someone else handling the dialogue would help.
But on the other hand, I don't know where his particular kind of genius comes from, so I don't know if I want to mess with the mix.
bow Banshee flight bow
Solo said:Nail, thy name is Sculli.