DonMigs85
Member
Cool! I hope they address the arcade dying thing. It'd really tear me up.
Then watch as they migrate over the power lines into some kid's house and live in a Wii U.
Cool! I hope they address the arcade dying thing. It'd really tear me up.
Her glitching becomes a power for her in the game, apparently everyone gets a power from what I heard.
I wonder if the characters are aware that other versions of themselves probably exist in other arcades all over the world. Shame they didn't touch on that. Also it's odd that apparently nobody questioned the "unique" arcade cabinets at Litwak's that feature characters no other cabinet like them in the world has (ie King Candy, Q-bert characters in Fix-It Felix, etc)
It's a cartoon.
They need to think of these things
Like how do the toys in Toy Story move when they have no apparent metabolic processes?
They need to think of these things
Like how do the toys in Toy Story move when they have no apparent metabolic processes?
So they could get the rights for Ryu, Ken, Chun li, M. Bison and Zangief from Capcom but not Mega Man or Dr. Wily. Yeah, oookay.
I still can't believe a J-pop group sang that song.
Sugar Rush sure had nice graphics for a game released in 1997
So I was reminded today that there's an actual Wreck-It-Ralph Video Game for consoles -- on the Wii, no less. So I went to check it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NARk8J9OyAs
Note: It's set from the ending of the film, so it has spoilers!
But man, just HOW shockingly awful it is, is quite amazing. I've seen student projects that were better in every way.
The setting isn't in 1997 - it has that modern DDR game.
But the game is supposed to be from 1997, like how Fix-It Felix Jr. is from 1982. Although both push it pretty hard for games of that era, but it would've taken away from the movie to downgrade games further than they already had to be realistic.
Well if we can accept that ddr game and rail shooter can be from 1997, then so should sugar rush.
Each of the main games are separated by 15 years. It's Ralph's 30th anniversary, from 1982. Sugar Rush came out in 1997. Hero's Duty got "plugged in just last week" (and the title of the Disney upload dates it as 2012).
Well, in the commercial they show kids playing Sugar Rush and footage from "inside" the game is pasted onto the screen.arent you forgetting that all of the games look completely different from the characters perspective inside of them?
arent you forgetting that all of the games look completely different from the characters perspective inside of them?
The setting isn't in 1997 - it has that modern DDR game.
You see the young girl gamer playing Sugar Rush at the end of the movie and from her perspective it looks identical to what it looks like to the video game characters. It would have been more authentic to give it a lower polygon look to match 1997 graphics but I guess the film makers thought that might be confusing. Either that or they simply gave the game too early a release year.
3D or 2D? Is the 3D essential like How to Train Your Dragon or is 2D perfectly fine? Did the 3D darken the image?
About to see this in an hour, so some advice would be nice.
3D is nice but not necessary. So far the only 3D movies I recommend would be Dragons and Avatar so I think my grading scale may be unfair.
Arcades were more advanced technically than their console contemporaries. Shit, we had this in 1996.If you consider that cart racers at the time looked like this (even in 2001) that Sugar Rush is a weird game from the arcade's perspective.
S-U-G-A-R, JUMP INTO YOUR RACING CAR! SUGAR-RUSH! SUGAR-RUSH!
go see it in 2D, you clearly see cameo characters better in the background, the colors and no headache associated with the glasses.
the action scenes are not 3D oriented anyway
The movie doesn't seem to be doing hugely well at the box office so far
Hopefully it'll pick up when it gets released in more territories.
Haha, what? This movie is doing perfectly fine.
Merchandising brah is what it's all about. Buy the toys.Well it might still beat Tangled, but is that enough to ensure a sequel?
Well it might still beat Tangled, but is that enough to ensure a sequel?
Tangled is kind of a special case with its gigantic production limbo. A sequel would cost probably half of it.It won't outgross Tangled I suspect, but it also cost significantly less to make. Tangled is one of the most expensively made movies of all time, cost about 100 million more to make compared to Wreck-It Ralph