Pop-O-Matic
Banned
I want to understand wrestling and give it a shot, but goddamn I feel like I'll never really understand the plot lines.
Guy X hates Guy Y
Guy Y hates Guy X
They fight
There might be a belt, woman or other object involved
I want to understand wrestling and give it a shot, but goddamn I feel like I'll never really understand the plot lines.
I want to understand wrestling and give it a shot, but goddamn I feel like I'll never really understand the plot lines.
Naw, Pro Wrestling has been for 100s year is still popular all over the world. There will be something on this.I always wonder if people who keep asking the WWE to produce better storylines understand that the entire industry is dying. Industries die all the time.
Wrestling started small, gained in popularity, and was propelled into the mainstream on an unsustainable business model.
In 20 years there will be no televised wrestling. Mark my words.
Wrestling has gone up and down in popularity for 100 years as in any sport. It have it peaks and valleys.People keep arguing with my post in various ways that I feel like I must make a comparison to clarify things.
Imagine if wrestling was a style of music that will always be played by someone, and will always be popular to someone.
But for a number of years, it tops the charts. Everyone knows about it. Then people lose interest. Then for most of us, it may as well not exist after that. That is what is happening to wrestling, albeit slowly.
Wrestling has gone up and down in popularity for 100 years as in any sport. It have it peaks and valleys.
People keep arguing with my post in various ways that I feel like I must make a comparison to clarify things.
Imagine if wrestling was a style of music that will always be played by someone, and will always be popular to someone.
But for a number of years, it tops the charts. Everyone knows about it. Then people lose interest. Then for most of us, it may as well not exist after that. That is what is happening to wrestling, albeit slowly.
It could ,you never know , that how pro wrestling and fights sports workThis argument is a decade plus old. No one thinks wrestling is going to go back to the popularity of the late 90s if WWE's writing was better. But could it have sustained 2012's level or had less of a drop off? Maybe.
I want to understand wrestling and give it a shot, but goddamn I feel like I'll never really understand the plot lines.
Because the demand is shrinking, and it's not generating revenue for as many parties as it used to.
That's pretty much the long and short of it.
WWE's product was also bad at times during the height of its success. Wrestling is not a prestige product. It's a carnival attraction soap opera. My entire point was that producing the stars like we had in 1998 or writing interesting storylines WILL NOT turn the WWE's fortunes. I wish people would stop repeating this ridiculous bit of conjecture.
People keep arguing with my post in various ways that I feel like I must make a comparison to clarify things.
Imagine if wrestling was a style of music that will always be played by someone, and will always be popular to someone.
But for a number of years, it tops the charts. Everyone knows about it. Then people lose interest. Then for most of us, it may as well not exist after that. That is what is happening to wrestling, albeit slowly.
Wrestling fans are a fickle mob that I don't really understand and I consider myself a fan.
Why are people still booing Roman Reigns? How is the Champ only on there part-time? Has Dolph Ziggler won the tittle yet? Raw has it's ups and downs but the last few PPV (including WM) have been sub par at best.
Except there's not just one style of wrestling, it changes and evolves over the years, just like music.
TBH you sound like someone who doesn't really know what you're talking about and has formed your conclusion before you've even come up with an argument to prove it.
last few PPV (including WM) have been sub par at best.
Why are people still booing Roman Reigns?
They should bring back Doink the clown id watch
because he still represents the mismanagement of the wwe. at least in terms of booking.
roman is vince's tool to tell us what we will like. and roman is our tool to tell vince what we don't like. if nothings changed with the way things are run, theres no reason to stop telling vince what we think.
i actually think most fans recognise that he's a good wrestler with a lot of charisma. i think they are booing vince. not roman per se.
they did
his name's Erick Rowan now
I thought that the criticism was that he had no charisma? I haven't meaningfully watched wrestling in a while, but I recall him not being particularly exciting or good on the mic
because he still represents the mismanagement of the wwe. at least in terms of booking.
roman is vince's tool to tell us what we will like. and roman is our tool to tell vince what we don't like. if nothings changed with the way things are run, theres no reason to stop telling vince what we think.
i actually think most fans recognise that he's a good wrestler with a lot of charisma. i think they are booing vince. not roman per se.
I feel like this is the same as ESPN. Like other staples of the 90s and 2000s, wrestling now has to compete with the endless entertainment source known as the internet. I completely fell off sports because there is so much shit to get into on the internet.
Have you tried Tout, though?
I have no clue what that is?
Vince can't hear your boos over all the money you're giving him for the chance to boo Roman.
They should bring back Doink the clown id watch
vince mcmahon is going to make money despite himself.
*1.89*???So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
So can muscle up dude who can work and get blown up easily? And can't ban something that been apart of wreslting for decades.They should bring back the Steroids and ban all of the ridiculous acrobatic bullshit. I just might watch.
So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
He was so great that he killed WCW and almost killed another one.Haha
How much longer will people keeping denying the greatness of Russo and how he was largely responsible for the Attitude Era aka the height of wrestling
Jinder's really boring.
He was so great that he killed WCW and almost killed another one.
Russo era WCW might be some of the worst wreslting I have seen in a while.So you're telling me that WCW was in a great place before he got there?
Russo haters also love to ignore TNA was drawing 2 million viewers when Russo was head of that
Russo era WCW might be some of the worst wreslting I have seen in a while.
Russo involved in TNA was the Miami reason why they were kick off of spike.
Randy Orton is worse =/
So apparently this week's raw actually did a 1.89, which is DOWN from last week's taped show, despite having a higher audience average.
wow
Russo era WCW might be some of the worst wreslting I have seen in a while.
Don't lie meIt was better than Raw is right now. I'll take David Arquette over Roman Reigns.
Russo era WCW might be some of the worst wreslting I have seen in a while.
Russo involved in TNA was the Miami reason why they were kick off of spike.
If WCW was still around I would guarantee you that Roman would not be in the position that he's in now.