spatenfloot
Member
Let's be honest. All people really want to know is if it will speak in a sexy voice while they browse bing for porn.
It'll be the same as every other voice recogniton on the planet. Any background noise and the thing will go to shit, also most will feel a complete dick using it in front of others. I've no idea how it will cope with a thick Geordie or Glaswegian accent either.
Apple don't even advertise Siri anymore now everyone knows its mostly complete shite.
The guy who got the Xbox Early said he had a lot of success with voice commands. It just takes a little time to get the hang of it. Even Kinect 1 has like a 95% success rate for me right now.
But no, it isn't going to be perfect, ever.
If there's talking on the TV I suppose they'll just mute it when it hears "XBOX!"
But how to mute actual talking? Do you have to tell your friends/family to shut the fuck up while you're changing the channel or whatever? Or how does it manage differentiating between multiple voices?
You'd think with accents...like I have no idea how intricate this stuff actually is, it's probably super difficult with tons of variables, but shouldn't you just be able to make up and tune your own commands? Like, say a phrase until it's reliably recognized, then tie that to whatever action you want. Use the cloud, Microsoft.
It's supposed to recognize everything out of the box for the sake of convenience. But for us who don't necessarily mind tweaking things a little to get a better experience? I'd love to be able to yell "XBOX DIN JÄVLA BAJSKORV!" have it turn off in shame, feeling confident in having exerted my dominance.
Wonder if it'd recognize my "rally English", or whatever they call the astonishingly beautiful Finnish accent.
Google Now is near perfection.
And yet, it worked perfectly at E3, in a cavernous ballroom in front of an audience peppered with cheering Microsoft employees.Probably will work better on a quiet environment like your living room.
Meh... Just like everyother voice recognition device
And yet, it worked perfectly at E3, in a cavernous ballroom in front of an audience peppered with cheering Microsoft employees.
Sarcasm? All the Kinect "demonstrations" at those events are entirely scripted.
As an owner of a original Kinect it works pretty damm well for voice commands. A few words do confuse it even now and then and you have to say it a little clearer. But for the majority of the time I have no problem with it.
I like the speed boost that the voice commands seem to have on the X1.
As long you dont have to use the feature then there shouldn't be any problems. Sure it will have trouble with picking voices outside of a quiet room. Just like any voice detection ever....
Adamsappel's profile picture should answer your question.![]()
Penello confirmed it wasn't filmed in one take.
Penello: I was talking to Marc last night and he was saying that the tech was working perfect.
10 of 45 voice commands issued had to be repeated by a Microsoft spokesman — some as many as four times.
So was just a bunch of baloney, hardly indicative of actual performance.
Penello's going to Penello.
Meh... Just like everyother voice recognition device
At a demonstration of the Xbox One this week organized by Microsoft, the new version of the company's voice-and-motion-detecting Kinect sensor didn't work nearly as flawlessly in real life. The Xbox 360 successor, which is scheduled for release Nov. 22, required several commands to be repeated for the response to pop up on screen.
"Microsoft got so intoxicated by the first generation of Kinect that I think they're just assuming people are still really excited about Kinect," said James McQuivey, Forrester Research analyst and author of "Digital Disruption: Unleashing the Next Wave of Innovation."
McQuivey said because Microsoft has turned its attention to other audiences besides just gamers, they could potentially sell half as many Xbox Ones as they did Xbox 360s over the next-gen console's lifetime, especially if the system doesn't work as advertised.
Yup on my gfs phone/ipad siri has about a 50-60% success rate with us.
Google now on my phone? 95-100% success.
Another article on it not sure if posted
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_24483084/xbox-one-shows-balky-response-voice-commands-at
This part was especially interesting
This is why Kinect sucks, and is not worth $100 more while getting weaker hardware. It's not doing anything new.
Yep its the same one from the OP, its an Associated Press article to its going so be posted at a bunch of different sites.
The idea doesn't suck in itself, even if MS's way of doing it isn't perfect. I don't personally think it's worth an extra $100 though.
So it's terrible.
I rather just use my controller
It might be worth $100 if sold separately, but it doesn't seem good enough, necessary enough, or wanted enough to warrant being a packed-in peripheral.
Microsoft has rubbed me the wrong way in the last generation, and I'll be going with the PS4, but I sure am avidly watching this XBone and am very much interested in how well it does.
I'm still torn. I think the latest UI videos looked pretty slick. I personally don't foresee myself using the snap features that often, and hopefully I'm only in the menus for a very limited time (in between gaming, browsing the marketplace, checking friends lists, etc.) - but it's nice to see some good thought put into those menus, as limited as my time there may be.
And this Kinect shit... I'm pretty anti-Kinect right now. My friend had the first one, it sucked. Voice commands sucked. The games he had sucked. Having to be in just the right position sucked. For me. It sucked.
So I don't know how useful this Kinect 2.0 will be... I think (FOR ME) the majority of the time I'll be in-game, not caring about how awesome menus are, or what options I could give via voice... I'll just be playing the game.
But maybe I'm wrong and voice commands are the shit. I'm looking forward to seeing more videos as this thing comes out, to see how it's practically used "in the wild" and maybe I'll reconsider and realize it's actually useful, and worth the cost to the system.
Not sure the point of this post. =) I guess I'm open-minded but skeptical?
Looking forward to more info. Cheers, Gaf!
Sums it up rather well.
Until voice recognition functions like the first picture, it is nothing but a hindrance IMO.
And now we're just throwing out things that have absolutely nothing to do with voice control or Kinect.
Not even comparable in any way, shape or form.
Good job.