I never once said I was offended by the bust slider. The "problematic" part is the lack of effort on the developer's part to offer a balanced amount of features between the different genders. We shouldn't have to choose.
If changing a female character's bust size is paramount in importance to you being able to create the character you want, then go for it. I have zero issue with that. (As I've repeatedly said.) But acting as if the option to change a woman's bust size is something inherent to proper female character customization but not seeing any issue with a lack of the same attention being given to the male characters is endemic of the normalization of female sexualization in the industry.
The character creator wasn't that in-depth in the first place. The fact that a breast slider was one of the 3 only sliders in the entire character creator speaks much about the developers priorities. Someone brought this up but you can make male CaC look old but there's no real option for the female CaC. I guess making thin young women that can wear crotch-window panties was more important than making a detailed character creator.
Won't be missed.
This. It was pervy fan service. Good riddance.The character creator wasn't that in-depth in the first place. The fact that a breast slider was one of the 3 only sliders in the entire character creator speaks much about the developers priorities. Someone brought this up but you can make male CaC look old but there's no real option for the female CaC. I guess making thin young women that can wear crotch-window panties was more important than making a detailed character creator.
Won't be missed.
I can always agree with more options.
I can't agree that fewer options is better though.
Facial/body hair and breasts do no correlate at all IMO. If developers are going to single out one aspect of the female body to accentuate, and that is the bust line, then the most equivalent option would be a bulge slider. (I know you disagree, but this is my view.)I don't think this is going to go anywhere, man. I see the breast slider as a way to change a prominent external visual aspect of the character, an aspect for which there is no male equivalent. You see the breast slider as a statement, and think it's a problem that this statement only applies to one gender.
I'd be on the same page with you if there were a camel toe slider or something, but I just don't think it's a problem that female characters have one more slider than male characters. Male characters don't have an exclusive trait with that kind of visibility, except for facial hair, for which options are already in the game.
Maybe a body hair slider would be more appropriate, but it still wouldn't be visible with most outfits.
Facial/body hair and breasts do no correlate at all IMO. If developers are going to single out one aspect of the female body to accentuate, and that is the bust line, then the most equivalent option would be a buldge slider. (I know you disagree, but this is my view.)
If we had a much more detailed amount of options for body customization which included breasts but still excluded a man's bulge, I could reasonably believe that it was done with the primary intent of individuality over sexualization, but that's not the case here. The bust slider is for sex appeal. There is no option included for the male characters, which in this case (if we're boiling it down to one defining trait) would be their bulge. This is where the problem lies in my view. If I had the choice, I wouldn't of removed the bust slider. It was over reactive on Nintendo's part IMO. But that still doesn't excuse the fact that a similiar feature wasn't offered for the male characters. If you don't think this is an issue, than I'd recommend trying to look at how sexualization of characters differs between the genders because it's a huge problem in the medium. One that requires not only a more varied and thoughtful selection of offerings for female characters, (a fact that cannot be stressed enough) but also more balanced treatment for male characters as well, which includes an increase in sexualization.
I'm not expecting Nintendo to be leading the way in dick technology, but if they want to have a bust slider, then it's fair game to call them out for not sexualizing the male characters in a similar fashion. (Though they've actually made strides in other games like the upcoming Fire Emblem Fates, while still having it's own issues, does a better job of offering equal sexualization between genders.)I do see discrepancies in the way genders are portrayed across the medium, I just feel hesitant to point to specific instances and say "you are the problem". One thing we can certainly agree on is that more options would be nice. Nintendo will never put in a dong slider, but I certainly wouldn't be the one to complain if they did.
I'm still waiting for that character action game starring a grizzled old woman.
I don't think this is going to go anywhere, man. I see the breast slider as a way to change a prominent external visual aspect of the character, an aspect for which there is no male equivalent. You see the breast slider as a statement, and think it's a problem that this statement only applies to one gender.
I'd be on the same page with you if there were a camel toe slider or something, but I just don't think it's a problem that female characters have one more slider than male characters. Male characters don't have an exclusive trait with that kind of visibility, except for facial hair, for which options are already in the game.
Maybe a body hair slider would be more appropriate, but it still wouldn't be visible with most outfits.
The thing is, Japan's definition of what is a sexy male is different from the West. Dick bulges, facial/body hair and swoleness are nowhere as high in the equation.
This. It was pervy fan service. Good riddance.
I would kill for a "slender" slider.The thing is, Japan's definition of what is a sexy male is different from the West. Dick bulges, facial/body hair and swoleness are nowhere as high in the equation.
In the past, Monolith Soft has worked with 8-4 on Baten Kaitos Origins, and one of the things 8-4 said about the experience was how open Monolith Soft were to their suggestions and wound up giving them a lot of freedom on how to pursue the localization for that game. They don't strike me as the kind of studio that would be up in arms at all about such a minor alteration like this.
Yes, those types of characters you often see derided on forums as too feminine. Dick sliders or whatnot wouldn't make much sense as a requirement even if you were to "level the field."Like this?
http://i.imgur.com/NemfLLG.jpg
I think that would be a sexy male just about anywhere on the planet.
There is no one size fits all answer anywhere really, the only viable solution is variety, and developers having the guts to try. Gaming will only benefit from developers striving to be inclusive and respectful.The thing is, Japan's definition of what is a sexy male is different from the West. Dick bulges, facial/body hair and swoleness are nowhere as high in the equation.
Well, yeah, I don't necessarily disagree with inclusiveness. "What can I change to attract more XYZ for my product" is a question that's been asked since time immemorial. But everyone will run into the issues of non-unlimited resources, whether it's worth the investment to attract XYZ, whether there are other innovative ways that would attract XYZ, etc.There is no one size fits all answer anywhere really, the only viable solution is variety, and developers having the guts to try. Gaming will only benefit from developers striving to be inclusive and respectful.
For anyone interested in a more in-depth discussion of male sexuality in gaming, we've had a really good dialogue going in this topic...
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1137134
Like that Rust game, right? That would certainty of been interesting.Well, yeah, I don't necessarily disagree with inclusiveness. "What can I change to attract more XYZ for my product" is a question that's been asked since time immemorial. But everyone will run into the issues of non-unlimited resources, whether it's worth the investment to attract XYZ, whether there are other innovative ways that would attract XYZ, etc.
I'm of the opinion that what Nintendo did here is boneheaded and helps them very little. Even if they didn't want to leave it in, they could have taken this as an opportunity to do something different -- instead of removing the bust slider, make it defined based on console ID -- that would have generated quite a bit of good vibes in this region without that much more work and mitigated the backlash. They took the easy way out without furthering much of anything.
Responses in here are gross.
Glad I don't care about any creepy things being removed and only care about the ACTUAL game.
haha what
in what way are boob sliders "creepy"
It's creepy that you want control over how big a female video game characters boobs should be.
I'm gay and I don't demand that a guys bulge should be bigger or have the ability to do so. I don't get the fascination with having to do so with a female character. It's creepy.
Girls have different breasts sizes, you know?
seriously man, there's nothing creepy about it.
Facial/body hair and breasts do no correlate at all IMO. If developers are going to single out one aspect of the female body to accentuate, and that is the bust line, then the most equivalent option would be a bulge slider. (I know you disagree, but this is my view.)
If we had a much more detailed amount of options for body customization which included breasts but still excluded a man's bulge, I could reasonably believe that it was done with the primary intent of individuality over sexualization, but that's not the case here. The bust slider is for sex appeal. There is no option included for the male characters, which in this case (if we're boiling it down to one defining trait) would be their bulge. This is where the problem lies in my view. If I had the choice, I wouldn't of removed the bust slider. It was overreacting on Nintendo's part IMO. But that still doesn't excuse the fact that a similiar feature wasn't offered for the male characters. If you don't think this is an issue, than I'd recommend trying to look at how sexualization of characters differs between the genders because it's a huge problem in the medium. One that requires not only a more varied and thoughtful selection of offerings for female characters, (a fact that cannot be stressed enough) but also more balanced treatment for male characters as well, which includes an increase in sexualization.
Relevant to bulge discussion:
![]()
lol this is NEVER an option. I love that this topic has all of GAFs attention and all the fuss, buzz, and uproar is on this instead of the gameplay topics.
It's so weird the way women breasts are often emphasized in these topics, but rarely any other specific feature (besides the face) on either gender's bodies.
It's as I said before, female sexualization is so ingrained in pop culture that many see it as the norm.Relevant to bulge discussion:
![]()
lol this is NEVER an option. I love that this topic has all of GAFs attention and all the fuss, buzz, and uproar is on this instead of the gameplay topics.
It's so weird the way women breasts are often emphasized in these topics, but rarely any other specific feature (besides the face) on either gender's bodies.
It's as I said before, female sexualization is so ingrained in pop culture that many see it as the norm.
If games want to have customization that emphasizes the sexualization of the characters, (*which is obviously not needed in every game) then the least they can do is strive to make it equal between the genders.
Thank you gurl.
Sorry, but trying to justify it is so fucking silly. And it's always the same crowd too.
And guys have different penis sizes, so we should have the option to do that as well?
I'd find that just as creepy. It's a video game and it's really not needed, even in character customization.
Relevant to bulge discussion:
![]()
lol this is NEVER an option. I love that this topic has all of GAFs attention and all the fuss, buzz, and uproar is on this instead of the gameplay topics.
It's so weird the way women breasts are often emphasized in these topics, but rarely any other specific feature (besides the face) on either gender's bodies.
It's creepy that you want control over how big a female video game characters boobs should be.
I'm gay and I don't demand that a guys bulge should be bigger or have the ability to do so. I don't get the fascination with having to do that to a female character. It comes off totally creepy.
Generally men don't walk around in skin tight pants showing their dick. Breasts however are always visible and prominent. Stop with the false equivalency.
When the primary function of a bust slider is to promote fan service, it is equivalent. As I said before, anyone thinking the ability to change the bust size in this game was included to promote body diversity, then you're being naive. (And breasts are certainly not always prominent.)Generally men don't walk around in skin tight pants showing their dick. Breasts however are always visible and prominent. Stop with the false equivalency.
If we had a much more detailed amount of options for body customization which included breasts but still excluded a man's bulge, I could reasonably believe that it was done with the primary intent of individuality over sexualization, but that's not the case here.
I think Nintendo are actually one of the few game companies content and pushing quite a bit of male fanservice along with the girls.I'm not expecting Nintendo to be leading the way in dick technology, but if they want to have a bust slider, then it's fair game to call them out for not sexualizing the male characters in a similar fashion. (Though they've actually made strides in other games like the upcoming Fire Emblem Fates, while still having it's own issues, does a better job of offering equal sexualization between genders.)
More options are always better. It wouldn't be fair for me to take issue with fanservice of female characters while canvasing hard for more male sexualization, but it's all about context and balance. Just as not every game needs to have its female characters sexualized as the defining aspect of their design (something I think we all agree on here, at least I'd hope so), but also that male characters would benefit from seeing a lot more sexualization. One of the reasons people take such issue with the extreme amount of fan service displayed by female characters (and with good reason), is that male characters are very rarely treated the same way. Most people enjoy seeing sexually attractive characters every now and then, so it's undoubtedly better when everyone can participate, not just straight men.
Would say toó as much as we complain males have the better end of the stick when it comes to actuall portrayal and treatment in general, not just sexualization,compared to girls of course that opens another can of wormsIt's as I said before, female sexualization is so ingrained in pop culture that many see it as the norm.
If games want to have customization that emphasizes the sexualization of the characters, (*which is obviously not needed in every game) then the least they can do is strive to make it equal between the genders.
"Creepy" is starting to become a really stupid word around here.
That's creepy!thank you
creepy is literally a meme here now
Facial hair. Look up hot Ryu.
They also removed the option to change to a smaller cup size than what it is now. Like it was said earlier, they could have reduced the range instead of removing the customization altogether.When the primary function of a bust slider is to promote fan service, it is equivalent. As I said before, anyone thinking the ability to change the bust size in this game was included to promote body diversity, then you're being naive. (And breasts are certainly not always prominent.)
To quote what I said earlier...
They've definitely made improvements in this regard, certainly. Fire Emblem, as I mentioned, is chock full of fanservice, but they have actually made the effort to make it even between genders. (They've even included same sex romance options, though while implemented in a very clunky fashion, they are at least trying to move forward.)I would say Nintendo are actually one of the few game companies content and pushing quite a bit of male fanservice along with the girls.
Definitely. I don't think anyone could (or should) dispute this. The treatment of female characters has an extremely long way to go before it's even remotely balanced. The amount of sexualization they are subject to is ridiculous. We desperately need a much more vaired and thoughtful selection of female characters. This is one of the biggest issues facing the medium. (If not the biggest.)Would say toó males have the better end of the stick when it comes to actuall portrayal and treatment in general, not just sexualization,compared to girls of course that opens another can of worms![]()
That certainly would of been a sensible solution.They also removed the option to change to a smaller cup size than what it is now. Like it was said earlier, they could have reduced the range instead of removing the customization altogether.
I always assume that Nintendo removes content to aim for specific age ratings when classified. Adjustable boobs in the eyes of the ESRB might be considered content that pushes it up a category.
I can't believe it's 2015 and there are people that are so terrified of sexuality that this has to be done.
Well, we are talking about the body here. If you want a female equivalent to facial hair, I'm sure female-only make-up, hairstyles and stuff can possibly even that out. Even if a lot of make-up is unisex in XBX (like facepaint).
But still, it would be fine IF there were more body options. There could be options for the butt, waist, bust etc. For the male that same boob slider could change muscle mass in the chest. It will all lead to a different silhouette.
![]()
But seriously, you can only change height and boobs... While the male only has height. It's just awkward and has 'fanservice' written all over it.
Bites for those wanting customization for their female MC's but not something that outright ruins the game; its still going to be the same game.
I've only just seen this but I'm disappointed. Whenever I play as a female character I make her small chested, as I come from a family where the women are small chested. There's absolutely no reason to take it out.
Some of the comparisons between breast sliders and the absence of a 'dick slider' are patently ridiculous.
1. Breasts are easily visible and part of the 'identifying silhouette' of a female character; penises are not
2. Breasts are secondary sex characteristics; the penis is a part of the male genitalia. Therefore the vulva is quite literally the apt comparison to the penis, and the 'camel toe' is the apt comparison for 'the bulge'. A muscular chest and arms is the closest comparison to breast size in men, as a muscular chest is seen as attractive, but it still has nowhere near the same effect on a person's overall 'look' as breast size does in women.
3. A slider to make the penis bigger has blatantly obvious sexual connotations (ie. an erection) in a way that breasts don't. Breasts are not always sexualised. Penises really are. A 12 year old girl might expect to be able to set her character's bust size, parents would find it completely unacceptable to see her setting a 'dick size' if she played as a male. It's way too sexualised. This stuff is bloody obvious, man.