• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Youtube/CNN Republican Debate tonight at 8 EST

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tamanon said:
BTW....If that gay retired general....turns out to be a worker on one of Clinton's steerage campaigns, does that count as planting a question.

Seriously, that would be a catastrophic clusterfuck for her campaign.
 
Ether_Snake said:
You really don't have a choice tho. You really think the president is the brain behind these decisions?
I think the President is the first stand of defense against it and if you pick someone is not going to defend then you're fucked.
 
siamesedreamer said:
The Iowa Caucus is January 3rd. New Hampshire is five days later.

Lots of candidates finished 3rd or 4th in Iowa or New Hampshire and still won the election. Like Bush for example. Ron Paul has a good shot in New Hampshire and he has the most money to spend there. Don't count him out
 
That guy is not gay.

And he looks like an Indian Spock.
 
Huckabee walked away with the debate - I was shocked. I figured Romney would hold off Rudy, thus setting up an interesting debate between the two. Instead Romney wabbled like I've never seen anyone wabble before, Rudy repeated the same shit, and McCain seemed to flail from enlightened statesman (ie on torture) to retarded talking point head (gays in the military).

Huckabee is going to get a lot of coverage this weekend which should propel him even farther. I doubt he'll beat Romney in Iowa due to the crazy amount of money Romney has put in the state, but he could make it real close
 
PhoenixDark said:
I doubt he'll beat Romney in Iowa due to the crazy amount of money Romney has put in the state, but he could make it real close

Lots of Christians in IA and they love the fair tax as well...I think Huckabee is going to win in Iowa. He will need SC to go any further though.
 
HAHAHHA

This is pathetic. This guy is not having it easy.
 
perfectchaos007 said:
Lots of candidates finished 3rd or 4th in Iowa or New Hampshire and still won the election. Like Bush for example. Ron Paul has a good shot in New Hampshire and he has the most money to spend there. Don't count him out

Look, I like a lot of Paul's domestic positions. But, he will not win the GOP nomination with his foriegn policy stances. Let's be realistic here.

The problem is that over 20 states are going on February 5th. Only the top candidates with a ton of money in the bank will be able to compete that day. Which is why we're going to be stuck with either Gules or Roms.
 
Bush, Clinton, Bush, Rudy or Clinton (same shit).

Notice a pattern?
 
Ether_Snake said:
That guy is not gay.

And he looks like an Indian Spock.

So you've propositioned him and he refused? Seriously. As a gay man I have to ask you, what the HELL? Why are you questioning his sexuality. And, lets say you're right (I'd guess you were wrong, but let's grant that). Is it still a valid question? Why should it matter to ANYONE whether or not Clinton planted the question? Are people of all ideologies not permitted to ask questions in a debate?

What the hell is the problem with answering the question from an AMERICAN. I did like one thing Huckabee said, that he'd be the President of ALL Americans. So suck it. I know I will be shortly.
 
I don't think Katrina has anything to do with why African-Americans vote for Republicans. They haven't voted for us in years.:lol
 
PhoenixDark said:
I doubt he'll beat Romney in Iowa due to the crazy amount of money Romney has put in the state, but he could make it real close

Huck has surged 12 points since Rasmussen's poll last month. He appears to be peaking at the right time. Still doesn't have enough money to compete long term though.
 
siamesedreamer said:
Huck has surged 12 points since Rasmussen's poll last month. He appears to be peaking at the right time. Still doesn't have enough money to compete long term though.

I think if he is perceived as being a serious candidate, the money will start coming. I bet his fundraising is up even recently since he's been doing better in Iowa. But you are right in that it is very late in the game...
 
HawkeyeIC said:
Lots of Christians in IA and they love the fair tax as well...I think Huckabee is going to win in Iowa. He will need SC to go any further though.


Yeah, after tonight who knows. I'm shocked that the fundementalist leaders haven't jumped on Huckabee's bandwagon yet - it could work in the primaries
 
siamesedreamer said:
Bill Bennett is losing a lot of credibility tonight with his frothing support of Romney. I mean...come on dude.

Bill Bennett lost a lot of credibility a long time ago... He isn't relevant anymore.
 
Gaborn said:
Still a valid question, regardless of the vehicle. I was unaware that gay democrats could not ask a question of a republican nominee.

Oh I completely agree they're definitely able to. But there needs to be a transparency to these things, just like the whole planted question thing during Hilary's town halls.
 
PhoenixDark said:
Yeah, after tonight who knows. I'm shocked that the fundementalist leaders haven't jumped on Huckabee's bandwagon yet - it could work in the primaries

If Romney starts to struggle in the polls, I expect them to jump ship.
 
Tamanon said:
Oh I completely agree they're definitely able to. But there needs to be a transparency to these things, just like the whole planted question thing during Hilary's town halls.

I think that's a little different, though not much. Hillary was passing those plants as genuine people asking genuine questions they wanted to know. In this case, as a gay former general I'm pretty sure it's his personal question because it's a policy he was affected by.
 
PhoenixDark said:
Yeah, after tonight who knows. I'm shocked that the fundementalist leaders haven't jumped on Huckabee's bandwagon yet - it could work in the primaries
well, huckabee got the falwell endorsement today.
 
I'm very concerned about several things I saw tonight:

1. Gays in the military - I was appalled at the answers the candidates gave tonight on this issue. At one point, the audience applauded (Hunter's?) answer that it would be bad for cohesion.

2. Immigration - WTF?! We are all in one way or another immigrants to this country. The current lawful process is broken and lets put it this way, someone in Russia (i.e.) who wants to come to the US legally shouldn't be holding their breath - I kid you not it takes somewhere between 5-15 years for this process to go through. So what is the solution these guys propose? Are we going to become a police state? Do what we did to the Japanese-Americans in WWII? Do what the English did in the movie Children of Man putting all the illegals in cages and jail?

Let me tell you guys something, I'm dreading 2008.
 
Gaborn said:
So you've propositioned him and he refused? Seriously. As a gay man I have to ask you, what the HELL? Why are you questioning his sexuality. And, lets say you're right (I'd guess you were wrong, but let's grant that). Is it still a valid question? Why should it matter to ANYONE whether or not Clinton planted the question? Are people of all ideologies not permitted to ask questions in a debate?

What the hell is the problem with answering the question from an AMERICAN. I did like one thing Huckabee said, that he'd be the President of ALL Americans. So suck it. I know I will be shortly.

I was talking about the amateurish post-show host, the intern-like guy. And yeah it was a pointless comment even in that case:p

Go back and read my post on the gay veteran.

Oh let me find it: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8752253&postcount=258
 
APF said:
CNN's manipulation of the questioning / etc in these debates is pretty ballsy.

More then a few of the questions made me chuckle. I didn't get the impression that many conservatives or undecided voters were asking those questions...

mckmas8808 said:

I liked his overall point about focusing on the overall themes of the bible and implementing them in your life - the theological differences among people are rather irrelevent compared to the points of "the Christian life" - peace, love, etc.

Now Huckabee only needs to implement them into his beliefs; I thought his answer on capitol punishment really contradicted the things he had previously said
 
Ether_Snake said:
I was talking about the amateurish post-show host, the intern-like guy. And yeah it was a pointless comment even in that case:p

Go back and read my post on the gay veteran.

Oh let me find it: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8752253&postcount=258

Ahhh fair enough, I agree that veterans get shoved aside a little because they're too powerful. Just like Romney is afraid to answer questions directly from people in wheelchairs because they're in wheelchairs (he's opposed to medical marijuana, therefore he wants to avoid medical marijuana patients).
 
PhoenixDark said:
More then a few of the questions made me chuckle. I didn't get the impression that many conservatives or undecided voters were asking those questions...

They select among the field of submitted videos. How would you 100% know what anybody was on that basis and even still that is going to be balanced among providing interesting questions. Which questions weren't legit?
 
It was still uncalled for for me to point out that the post-debate host is probably gay:p
 
Ether_Snake said:
It was still uncalled for for me to point out that the post-debate host is definitely gay:p

Fixed, though that doesn't make it any more relevant.

Oops - were you referring to someone other than Cooper?
 
Stoney Mason said:
They select among the field of submitted videos. How would you 100% know what anybody was on that basis and even still that is going to be balanced among providing interesting questions. Which questions weren't legit?

Any questions whose premise he disagreed with obviously. People who don't agree with the standard NeoCon line are not allowed to ask GiuliMcRompson any questions whatsoever without being water tortured.
 
APF said:
I don't disagree with you, but it's not just that question and it's not just this debate.

Personally I WANT my candidate to face the toughest possible questions, from the toughest critics possible. I'm damn sure the Democrats aren't going to play nice in the general election so they might as well get all the shit out of the way now.
 
Stoney Mason said:
They select among the field of submitted videos. How would you 100% know what anybody was on that basis and even still that is going to be balanced among providing interesting questions. Which questions weren't legit?

I thought the religious questions suggested a certain bias, as did a couple of the abortion questions regarding what should happen to women who have illegal abortions. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the questions, just that the intent was pretty obvious
 
PhoenixDark said:
More then a few of the questions made me chuckle. I didn't get the impression that many conservatives or undecided voters were asking those questions...



I liked his overall point about focusing on the overall themes of the bible and implementing them in your life - the theological differences among people are rather irrelevent compared to the points of "the Christian life" - peace, love, etc.

Now Huckabee only needs to implement them into his beliefs; I thought his answer on capitol punishment really contradicted the things he had previously said

Yeah that whole capital punishment thing was bad
 
PhoenixDark said:
I thought the religious questions suggested a certain bias, as did a couple of the abortion questions regarding what should happen to women who have illegal abortions. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the questions, just that the intent was pretty obvious

Well there is always going to be some form of bias in the framing of any questions but I didn't especially think those were biased. No more than other hypotheticals that generally get asked. The abortion question was certainly dumb however.
 
mckmas8808 said:
Yeah that whole capital punishment thing was bad

Capitol punishment is the only political issue I mix religion in; I simply don't think man is qualified to make that decision. That decision requires infinite understanding of the case since it's a question of life or death, and no one is all knowing.

So yeah, Huckabee screwed up there big time to me. It's not like I'd vote for him either way, but I will say I was disappointed by his answer
 
A post-debate poll in Iowa and Florida has Huckabee as the winner by far:

InsiderAdvantage/Majority Opinion released two new statewide surveys (conducted 11/28) of 1,035 registered Republicans in Iowa and 341 registered Republicans in Florda, who in a pre-debate interview said (a) they were undecided about the Republican race (b) said they were planning to watch tonight's debate and (c) were willing to call in after the debate to answer questions. All Florida respondents had to dial in after the debate.

* Among Republicans in Iowa, 32% believe former Gov. Mike Huckabee won tonight's Republican debate; former Gov. Mitt Romney gets 16%, former Mayor Rudy Giuliani 12%, Sen. John McCain 10%, former Sen. Fred Thompson 7%, Rep. Ron Paul 6%.

* Among Republicans in Florida -- who in a pre-debate interview said (a) they were undecided about the Republican race (b) they were planning to watch tonight's debate and (c) were willing to call in after the debate to answer questions -- 44% believe Huckabee won the debate; Giuliani gets 18%, Romney 13%, McCain 10%, Thompson 5%.
 
Thompson is so flat. When he has a nice opening for a joke he seems to gain some life, but outside of that he's usually dead on the stage.
 
Father_Brain said:
Fixed, though that doesn't make it any more relevant.

Oops - were you referring to someone other than Cooper?

Yes. Cooper is not gay. I bet he visits different clubs on the weekends hoping to hit it with the "wild youth of today" he used to report on in his Anderson 360 show, failing every time.
 
Father_Brain said:
A post-debate poll in Iowa and Florida has Huckabee as the winner by far:

Seems like a TOTALLY objective and impartial source :lol :lol

In the media Spin Room, most of the major candidates were left with little if any media attention as virtually all print and broadcast media circled Governor Huckabee.

NOTE: OUR CAMERAS CAPTURED AN ALTERCATION WHICH OCCURRED WITHIN FEET OF GOVERNOR HUCKABEE AND WHICH CAUSED SECURITY TO BE SUMMONED. WE WILL BE POSTING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AN UNEDITED VERSION OF OUR LIVE COVERAGE WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE ALTERCATION, AS WELL AS REACTION FROM GOVERNOR HUCKABEE UPON LEARNING OF THE RESULTS OF THE POLLS AS WELL AS AN INTERVIEW WITH HUCKABEE SUPPORTER CHUCK NORRIS. WE WILL POST A CONSTANT CONTACT WHEN THE VIDEO IS AVAILABLE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom