MightyHedgehog
Member
Yeah, I saw that...it's pretty neat, honestly. I'm sure it can be more than the binary result I was talking about even just tracking a face or the outline of the head.gofreak said:
I dunno...I think Sony's going to come at from all angles...they really need to if Move is going to live past its first year or simply limp through it, IMO. I can't imagine they're extremely happy with the impression left by their press conference and media showoff from a while back.
Yeah, they've said a lot and, by all accounts, it should have no reason to fail to impress at its coming out party...they cannot afford to even manage a mildly impressive showing. They need to blow shit up big time.As for MS, they've got plenty they'll hopefully show. The applications that show the expansion of camera-based control, and its relevance/applicability etc. Perhaps even some pure tech demo stuff that might show more than the first software does. Some final specs would be nice too
Both MS and Sony have to really knock it out of the park and do really hope both do since both approaches have tons of potential. (It could also light a fire under the market leader's ass to do more with their platform and its still untapped potential, IMO.) Honestly, this second wave of motion control is the most interested I've been in gaming in some time...it's really crucial to the future of console gaming across the board if a massive and growing portion of the consumer base is voting motion control in as a standard. Gaming with motion control needs to widen and improve to include traditional gamers, too. Otherwise, we're staring at a potential problem for the next gen to start when it comes to software focus given how risky it is to make any sort of game even in the current gen.
I agree. Unimpressive and simple as it might seem, I think it's just the application not being showy enough...not that full package that is able to surmount the high level of skepticism about the technology and approach, in general.
So, I take it that, because you have had to repeatedly attack my post yet gofreak has not taken issue with that statement, you see a problem that he doesn't. I assume that gofreak knows what I meant because he hasn't felt the need to respond to it...not even the slightest response and, certainly, not the way you are now. I was having a conversation with him and I'll take his lack of direct response to the part you apparently have a problem with as a sign that he understood what I was saying. You don't get it. Fine. Believe what you like, man. If you wanna win something, well, you just beat my patience to explain something down and you won whatever it is you think you did.cakefoo said:
Again, keep ignoring the larger context of a bigger conversation, completely limit and define what other people are saying by an outside and too-literal viewpoint that slices out choice pieces, and you'll win every single argument you ever enter into. Gratz, man.
