It means we're letting loose the dogs of war
hype
It's an amazing feeling reading the Lang thread and knowing a lot but we can't say it
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=202756655#post202756655
Thread RE: Lex Lang.
PLEASE KEEP ALL UNCHARTED DISCUSSION OUT OF THAT THREAD. IT IS NOT ABOUT THE EASTER EGG.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=202756655#post202756655
Thread RE: Lex Lang.
PLEASE KEEP ALL UNCHARTED DISCUSSION OUT OF THAT THREAD. IT IS NOT ABOUT THE EASTER EGG.
people are starting to post about the easter egg...
Some people will be able to make the connection.
people are starting to post about the easter egg...
Some people will be able to make the connection.
100/10Well that isn't happening. That thread is sullied with teases to this easter egg now.
Ok yeah, got spoiled to this in the new VA thread. Pretty salty.
No-one forced you to use the spoiler tagsOk yeah, got spoiled to this in the new VA thread. Pretty fuckin salty.
No-one forced you to use the spoiler tags
The thing is even if I ''figured'' that it was a real spoiler I would have been spoiled by figuring it out! The whole thing is implying at it.
Sorry, my friend. I thought the voice actor thing was threadworthy and did my best to not mention anything that would incite discussion of the easter egg in my OP.
people are starting to post about the easter egg...
Some people will be able to make the connection.
The thread itself didn't spoil it, it was few posts in there that heavily imply it. I did read the spoiler tagged post and that is on me but just the existence of spoiler tags in a thread like this+a thread about UC4 Easter Egg floating about it would not have been hard to do 1+1.
GG anyone with half a brain who hasn't been spoiled and walk into that new ''case'' thread
Why am I feeling that we are indeed getting a Crash game announced, but as a project spearheaded by Activision? Maybe ND are in the know, and Sony is doing the marketing rights for the game, hence this easter egg.
Why am I feeling that we are indeed getting a Crash game announced, but as a project spearheaded by Activision? Maybe ND are in the know, and Sony is doing the marketing rights for the game, hence this easter egg.
I don't care if it's done by Activision or Peter fuckin Molyneux as long as it turns out ok.
If this were the case, we definitely would have seen Activisions name in the credits.
No they would have put it in the credits, legally needed or noWho would Activision hire to develop the game to though? Platinum lol?
Actually....
True, but we can't be sure what happening behind the scenes legality-wise.
No they would have put it in the credits, legally needed or no
Amazing.
HAHAHAHA oh GOD!
Uncharted 4 contains a THIRD FUCKING CRASH REFERENCE.
HAHAHAHA oh GOD!
Uncharted 4 contains a THIRD FUCKING CRASH REFERENCE.
And still no credit for Activision at the end of the game.
Yeah, Sony has the IP I'm sure.
Maybe ND has the rights to the first PS1 games since they made them?
Maybe ND has the rights to the first PS1 games since they made them?
Elena: Did you ever seen a wumba before?um excuse that is athank youapple
Sony has publishing contracts for the first four, but they don't have any rights to use the games. They publish them on the store because they are the official lifetime publisher for the first five Crash games. It's stillan Activision product. If you need tangible evidence, you can look to Naughty Dog's art book, which required Activision to be credited despite all the art being from Crash 1-3 and CTR.(was?)
Elena: Did you ever seen a wumba before?
Nate: No, but it isan apple
Also, since it looks almost everything there in the level has been remade or created for this, technically that is not Crash 1. So yeah, they need either the rights or the license to use that
HAHAHAHA oh GOD!
Uncharted 4 contains a THIRD FUCKING CRASH REFERENCE.