• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF
  • Like

DarkLordMalik
Member
(09-25-2017, 08:07 PM)
DarkLordMalik's Avatar

Originally Posted by Busty

Do you seriously think that Homecoming would have pulled down those numbers worldwide if Iron Man wasn't in it and featured so prominently in the marketing?

Iron Man effect is only true for the opening. Once people actually saw the movie and word got out about how his role is barely in the movie, do you think people seriously kept going to watch it just to see this tiny role of Iron Man? Nope.

Originally Posted by kswiston

I think the issue with BvS is that it was the first time that Batman and Superman had ever been on the big screen together (and the first time Wonder Woman had been on the big screen period).

We just had Civil War last year, and RDJ was in Spider-Man Homecoming for like 5-10 minutes. Happy had as much screen time.

BvS would be easy 1 billion if it had come out after Wonder Woman. It is not like the story in WW makes any less sense this way since it is a Super Hero Origin story. Heck if this happened, her cameo would have been a BIG deal in the actual movie but ended up being a silent thud.
snap
Banned
(09-25-2017, 08:20 PM)

Originally Posted by Busty

Eh. I feel like War for the Planet of the Apes was solid and really ended up at a fair worldwide gross.

This wasn't some cinematic triumph and felt like the trilogy was going out on a whimper rather than the bang it deserved.

FIGHT ME

think the thing with the apes trilogy is that it drew in two crowds, the ones who were there to see a "smart" blockbuster and the ones who liked the really good action of dawn. war didn't really have the latter, so those who were expecting that were really disappointed, but critics and people like me who were looking for the former were very happy with the movie we got.
Primethius
Banned
(09-25-2017, 08:26 PM)
Primethius's Avatar
Hopefully Spidey bests SM3 worldwide. What are the chances?
3N16MA
Banned
(09-25-2017, 08:26 PM)
3N16MA's Avatar
I honestly think CW did more for HC than the Iron Man feature (not that it didn't have somewhat of an impact).

Audiences finally got to see Spidey as part of the MCU and the debut was well received. That alone peaked interest in the reboot.
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 08:34 PM)
Miles X's Avatar
They spend a mere $35m on IT but $185m on Blade Runner?!
LordOfLore
Banned
(09-25-2017, 08:37 PM)
So...is $150 million OW for JL good after BvS?

'Clifford the Big Red Dog' Nabs 'Alvin and the Chipmunks' Director

David Oyelowo to Star in Disney Musical From 'Moonlight' Playwright
kevin1025
Banned
(09-25-2017, 08:39 PM)

Originally Posted by Miles X

They spend a mere $35m on IT but $185m on Blade Runner?!

That Atari license doesn't come cheap!
Grizzlyjin
Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
(09-25-2017, 08:48 PM)
Grizzlyjin's Avatar

Originally Posted by LordOfLore

David Oyelowo to Star in Disney Musical From 'Moonlight' Playwright

Queen of Katwe paying off for him. He was really great in that, by the way. Glad to see Disney is keeping him close.
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 08:50 PM)
Miles X's Avatar
Wonder if War of the Apes can leg it to $500m WW.

It has $28m to go with Japan ($12 - $30m based on previous two installments).

Not sure how much more it can get from China, probably $5m max.
DeathyBoy
Banned
(09-25-2017, 08:55 PM)

Originally Posted by LordOfLore

So...is $150 million OW for JL good after BvS?

'Clifford the Big Red Dog' Nabs 'Alvin and the Chipmunks' Director

David Oyelowo to Star in Disney Musical From 'Moonlight' Playwright

It depends on the legs.

That's a great OW. Film just needs legs.
Busty
when Jesus ain't watching Kinect will watch over you
(09-25-2017, 08:58 PM)
Busty's Avatar

Originally Posted by DarkLordMalik

Iron Man effect is only true for the opening. Once people actually saw the movie and word got out about how his role is barely in the movie, do you think people seriously kept going to watch it just to see this tiny role of Iron Man? Nope.

Only true of the opening? Oh stop, what utter nonsense. Yet another poster that knows absolutely nothing about how they majority of modern cinema audiences actually go and see films and process (for want of a better word) a film like Homecoming's marketing/message.
El Topo
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:01 PM)
El Topo's Avatar

Originally Posted by Miles X

They spend a mere $35m on IT but $185m on Blade Runner?!

Wait, they spent $185m on Blade Runner 2049? What? Have they lost their godamn minds?
Kenzodielocke
Banned
(09-25-2017, 09:05 PM)
Warner Bros. and their budget management sometimes. Jeez. King Arthur already had such a huge budget and they are topping it again. Justice League could be 250-300M.
Ross61
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:08 PM)
Ross61's Avatar

Originally Posted by Miles X

They spend a mere $35m on IT but $185m on Blade Runner?!

Uh, yes lol? Thought they would have similiar budgets?
Gentleman Jack
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:13 PM)
Gentleman Jack's Avatar

Originally Posted by Miles X

They spend a mere $35m on IT but $185m on Blade Runner?!

Do you really think Harrison Ford even gets out of his dressing gown for anything less than 8 figures? Look at what they paid him to stand around and mumble in TFA. Also giving a massive VFX budget to IT would have doomed it for certain.
Jigorath
Banned
(09-25-2017, 09:23 PM)

Originally Posted by DarkLordMalik

Iron Man effect is only true for the opening. Once people actually saw the movie and word got out about how his role is barely in the movie, do you think people seriously kept going to watch it just to see this tiny role of Iron Man? Nope.

Yep. The most important thing for Homecoming is that people liked the movie and the characters. That's why legs were so solid. Bodes well for a sequel even without RDJ.
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:27 PM)
Miles X's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ross61

Uh, yes lol? Thought they would have similiar budgets?

Who on earth would think they would be similar? Don't jump to such extremes. IT could have done with a bit more cash (but turned out fine anyway) but that much for Blade Runner is just stupid.
MHWilliams
(09-25-2017, 09:27 PM)
MHWilliams's Avatar

Originally Posted by Toa TAK

Everybody see mother!

Nah. Mother! is making as much as a movie like mother! is supposed to make.
Ross61
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:28 PM)
Ross61's Avatar

Originally Posted by Miles X

Who on earth would think they would be similar? Don't jump to such extremes. IT could have done with a bit more cash (but turned out fine anyway) but that much for Blade Runner is just stupid.

Why is it stupid?
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:29 PM)
Miles X's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ross61

Why is it stupid?

Because it clearly has a ceiling that isn't anywhere near justifying that budget.
Ross61
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:30 PM)
Ross61's Avatar

Originally Posted by Miles X

Because it clearly has a ceiling that isn't anywhere near justifying that budget.

What’s the ceiling?
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:30 PM)
Miles X's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ross61

What’s the ceiling?

IMO $220m DOM, $450m WW. But that's best case scenario.
Ross61
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:31 PM)
Ross61's Avatar

Originally Posted by Miles X

IMO $220m DOM, $450m WW. But that's best case scenario.

Why is that as high as it can go to you?
Jigorath
Banned
(09-25-2017, 09:31 PM)
Yeah I don't know what the ceiling for Blade Runner is. It's not like we get a lot of movies like Blade Runner nowadays to compare.
Schlorgan
Member
(09-25-2017, 09:31 PM)
Schlorgan's Avatar
Blade Runner having pretty much the same budget as Star Trek Beyond is a bit nuts.
MHWilliams
(09-25-2017, 09:44 PM)
MHWilliams's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ross61

Why is that as high as it can go to you?

Because that's around the best most straight-forward scifi films do. It'd be one thing if they were selling it as an action film that happened to be in the future, but they aren't.

The Martian: $228 million domestic
Interstellar: $188 million
Rise of the Planet of the Apes: $176 million
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes: $208 million
War for the Planet of the Apes: $146 million
Arrival: $100 million
Passengers: $100 million
Oblivion: $89 million
Minority Report: $132 million
Prometheus: $126 million

Treating it as a thriller isn't much better for the most part. Could it break out? Sure. But by and large, the prospects aren't great for scifi films. It's not the kind of film you'd normally spend $185 million on.
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:05 PM)
Miles X's Avatar

Originally Posted by MHWilliams

Because that's around the best most straight-forward scifi films do. It'd be one thing if they were selling it as an action film that happened to be in the future, but they aren't.

The Martian: $228 million domestic
Interstellar: $188 million
Rise of the Planet of the Apes: $176 million
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes: $208 million
War for the Planet of the Apes: $146 million
Arrival: $100 million
Passengers: $100 million
Oblivion: $89 million
Minority Report: $132 million
Prometheus: $126 million

Treating it as a thriller isn't much better for the most part. Could it break out? Sure. But by and large, the prospects aren't great for scifi films. It's not the kind of film you'd normally spend $185 million on.

Blade Runner has a very bleak and dank atmosphere as well, of course that's part of what makes it what it is. Even without the whitewashing controversy I don't think GiTS would have done much better. Just my opinion that these style of films look hard to sit through for a lot of people.

I'd love to be proven wrong, but BR49 is projected to open around $40 and finish around $115 ... unless it's HUGE internationally, it's not even gonna make back it's money ...

I imagine for WB to call it a success they'd be wanting around $500m WW.
OrangeAtlas
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:11 PM)
OrangeAtlas's Avatar
Blade Runner's also long as hell, meaning less showings per day.
Jigorath
Banned
(09-25-2017, 10:12 PM)

Originally Posted by Miles X

Blade Runner has a very bleak and dank atmosphere as well, of course that's part of what makes it what it is. Even without the whitewashing controversy I don't think GiTS would have done much better. Just my opinion that these style of films look hard to sit through for a lot of people.

I'd love to be proven wrong, but BR49 is projected to open around $40 and finish around $115 ... unless it's HUGE internationally, it's not even gonna make back it's money ...

I imagine for WB to call it a success they'd be wanting around $500m WW.

I thought WB was only distributing it in the US? Domestic gross is what matters to them.
overcast
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:16 PM)
overcast's Avatar
No doubt about that Blade Runner budget being ridiculous but hopefully it looks expensive because that'll make it worth it for me.

Not so much WB.
Schlorgan
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:18 PM)
Schlorgan's Avatar

Originally Posted by OrangeAtlas

Blade Runner's also long as hell, meaning less showings per day.

But think about all the value!
Timu
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:22 PM)
Timu's Avatar

Originally Posted by OrangeAtlas

Blade Runner's also long as hell, meaning less showings per day.

Wait, really? What's the run time for that movie?
Ross61
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:24 PM)
Ross61's Avatar

Originally Posted by MHWilliams

Because that's around the best most straight-forward scifi films do. It'd be one thing if they were selling it as an action film that happened to be in the future, but they aren't.

The Martian: $228 million domestic
Interstellar: $188 million
Rise of the Planet of the Apes: $176 million
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes: $208 million
War for the Planet of the Apes: $146 million
Arrival: $100 million
Passengers: $100 million
Oblivion: $89 million
Minority Report: $132 million
Prometheus: $126 million

Treating it as a thriller isn't much better for the most part. Could it break out? Sure. But by and large, the prospects aren't great for scifi films. It's not the kind of film you'd normally spend $185 million on.

Are you sure about that? Every impression for the trailers on GAF make it seem that way....

250+ domestic
flkraven
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:25 PM)
flkraven's Avatar

Originally Posted by Busty

Do you seriously think that Homecoming would have pulled down those numbers worldwide if Iron Man wasn't in it and featured so prominently in the marketing?

All I said was that people were saying Spidey's numbers were disappointing early on, but it's legs have nowit into a pretty huge number. What that comment has anything to do with RDJ or Iron Man is beyond me. Is RDJ simultaneously responsible for both the general pessimism around opening week that caused some to say the Sony/Marvel agreement didn't pay off AND the strong legs that helped carried it to 4th place WW for 2017 and make it one of the most successful Spider-Man's ever? Or did you just want another opportunity to mention RDJ?
shintoki
sparkle this bitch
(09-25-2017, 10:31 PM)
shintoki's Avatar
What the flying fuck at BR's budget. 185mil?

Someone is going to lose a job.
Busty
when Jesus ain't watching Kinect will watch over you
(09-25-2017, 10:37 PM)
Busty's Avatar

Originally Posted by flkraven

All I said was that people were saying Spidey's numbers were disappointing early on, but it's legs have nowit into a pretty huge number. What that comment has anything to do with RDJ or Iron Man is beyond me. Is RDJ simultaneously responsible for both the general pessimism around opening week that caused some to say the Sony/Marvel agreement didn't pay off AND the strong legs that helped carried it to 4th place WW for 2017 and make it one of the most successful Spider-Man's ever? Or did you just want another opportunity to mention RDJ?

The fact that Iron Man's presence in the film played a huge part in Homecoming's global box office success is obviously something that you are uncomfortable with.

Why do you think that is?

LENNY.buzz.Jpg
BronsonLee
Banned
(09-25-2017, 10:38 PM)

Originally Posted by Busty

Only true of the opening? Oh stop, what utter nonsense. Yet another poster that knows absolutely nothing about how they majority of modern cinema audiences actually go and see films and process (for want of a better word) a film like Homecoming's marketing/message.

Bitch I know everything
Lima
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:39 PM)
Lima's Avatar
Saw Downsizing today in a sneak preview(pretty early yo).

I mean I already thought Alexander Payne was a pretty legit director but this was amazing. Dude never made a bad movie from what I’ve seen and this was probably his best one yet. I expect this to win the original screenplay Oscar next year. Original idea and charming execution. Funny as hell and with lots of political undertones. Everyone was great in this. Especially Sudekis.

Highly recommended when this opens in December (lol)
DarkLordMalik
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:40 PM)
DarkLordMalik's Avatar

Originally Posted by Busty

Only true of the opening? Oh stop, what utter nonsense. Yet another poster that knows absolutely nothing about how they majority of modern cinema audiences actually go and see films and process (for want of a better word) a film like Homecoming's marketing/message.

I am going to wait for Homecoming 2 to gross the same without RDJ so I can come back to this post and laugh at it.
BronsonLee
Banned
(09-25-2017, 10:42 PM)

Originally Posted by Busty

The fact that Iron Man's presence in the film played a huge part in Homecoming's global box office success is obviously something that you are uncomfortable with.

I'm uncomfortable with the fact that a man shorter than I am makes 50 million dollars per film and has no problem wearing 6 inch lifts

Originally Posted by DarkLordMalik

I am going to wait for Homecoming 2 to gross the same without RDJ so I can come back to this post and laugh at it.

That's stupid because RDJ's role was to boost the 1st one and get it set up to be by itself moving forward

Like that's the entire point
OrangeAtlas
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:43 PM)
OrangeAtlas's Avatar

Originally Posted by Timu

Wait, really? What's the run time for that movie?

160 minutes.

So about 1.6 Thor: Ragnaroks.

Much more worthy of a ticket purchase.

Originally Posted by Schlorgan

But think about all the value!

Schlorgan knows what's up.
Slayven
gimme some o dat God-crafted alabaster greatness
(09-25-2017, 10:43 PM)
Slayven's Avatar
185 mil on Blade Runner?

A lot of people going to get fired
Busty
when Jesus ain't watching Kinect will watch over you
(09-25-2017, 10:44 PM)
Busty's Avatar

Originally Posted by BronsonLee

I'm uncomfortable with the fact that a man shorter than I am makes 50 million dollars per film and has no problem wearing 6 inch lifts.

You tower over RDJ owing to your vast political powers and thick, luscious hair.
BronsonLee
Banned
(09-25-2017, 10:45 PM)

Originally Posted by Busty

You tower over RDJ owing to your vast political powers and thick, luscious hair.

I was a part of my student government in elementary and high school~

Also my comb doubles as a switchblade!
Miles X
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:51 PM)
Miles X's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ross61

Are you sure about that? Every impression for the trailers on GAF make it seem that way....

250+ domestic

I get the feeling you can't seperate your hopes from reality :P

I'd be surprised if this jumped from $40m OW prediction to $80m.

This comes out next friday and its OW projections haven't really changed at any point.
snap
Banned
(09-25-2017, 10:52 PM)
Wiki implies Sony and WB both contributed to the budget, at least Columbia is listed as a production company and WB is the distributor. It being a Sony production explains why the budget is so massive.

edit: BOM is down right now but wiki says Blade Runner opened to a $7M opening weekend? even adjusting for WOM and home video sales can't imagine the audience for this is that great.
Litan
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:52 PM)
Litan's Avatar

Originally Posted by Busty

Only true of the opening? Oh stop, what utter nonsense. Yet another poster that knows absolutely nothing about how they majority of modern cinema audiences actually go and see films and process (for want of a better word) a film like Homecoming's marketing/message.

Well, we cant all be as knowledgeable as you, Busty.
BronsonLee
Banned
(09-25-2017, 10:53 PM)
I thought we had already established that I am the one true purveyor of whether a movie succeeds or not
Busty
when Jesus ain't watching Kinect will watch over you
(09-25-2017, 10:55 PM)
Busty's Avatar

Originally Posted by Litan

Well, we cant all be as knowledgeable as you, Busty.

I have a bunch of T-shirts with this printed on them if you're interested.

PM me for details.
pestul
Member
(09-25-2017, 10:57 PM)
pestul's Avatar
I mentioned that $185M budget for BR ages ago and people just laughed it off..

It's an absolutely insane budget for an October sci-fi release. And it also feels like there has been a fair amount spent on marketing of late. I hope it's awesome because of it, but there's the chance that a $100+M loss could have a rippling effect through the genre. As pointed out earlier, I really want Denis to get $150+M for the Dune remake.

Thread Tools