for me the combat is amazing in these games but I could never get into them regardless.
It's not the difficulty, it's the lack of reasonable checkpoint/save system that made it a chore for me, fueled by trial&error game design.
And then seeing all those streams and videos where people just rush to their corpse after dying,skipping all the mobs and everything, just makes me question : what's the point of that system then? Punishing? I call it tedious.
Both are great. Bloodborne is really tough at the beginning, but is totally doable. I was able to beat it and Im a fairly casual player.
Nioh, is way fucking hard for me. Its difficulty continuously ramps up, I've only gotten half way through, I doubt Ill ever get much further.
Agree, mostly. Even with the shortcut it was frustrating and tedious to have to work and backtrack before tackling Gascoigne again, especially in a game designed around trial and error. A save point across the bridge would have made sense and encouraged players to retry and learn.
But I can't stand combat in game where the enemies have "invincibility frames" - it's cheap and shit. There's no skill to learning that sort of thing.
BotW also commits this crime, which is even worse as the combat is based around limited resource management, yet it will let the player waste arrows while the boss is doing an invulnerable animation. Thankfully it's bosses are much easier.
The difficulty is overblown to the point where some people will have you believe that you take 3 steps in the game and instantly die
Bloodborne is the better game -- amazing setting, bosses, gameplay. I found Nioh tedious and repetitive.
Can't wait for OP's "I've been stuck in the beginning area for five hours" BB thread.
I'd get Dark Souls 3 instead. It's a great "best of Souls" and easy to get into.
Is DS3 easier to get into and ok to play having no prior experience of DS1 or 2? Is there a Gascogine skill-gate?
Is DS3 easier to get into and ok to play having no prior experience of DS1 or 2? Is there a Gascogine skill-gate?
Seeing your posts, you won't like DS3. It works the same way as do Bloodborne in terms of dificulty, exp resources, checkpoints, etc
I can't fucking stand Soulsborne games, and I gave it a fair shot with Bloodborne. Hate it. Legitimately one of my worst experiences ever playing a game. I'd refund this trash game if I had the option.
Nioh runs at 60 fps, has more distinct weapons
10 is ~ nearly double the number.Wtf am I reading here. Nioh, the game with 6~ types of weapons that come from real life weapons you see in every single melee action game, has more distinct weapons than Bloodborne of all things.
This is like, a literal lie.
I actually put more time in Nioh then Bloodborne, because the fighting is so good.
Nioh is less obtuse than Bloodborne.
With a proper story and a proper tutorial which explains pretty much everything.
It's also more forgiving because if you fuck up for your character build you can always respec. Nothing is permanent.
And if you're a fan of fast paced combat action game, Nioh has that Ninja Gaiden blood in it.
Overall if you're new to these types of game, you should start with Nioh first.
To be fair King's Field IV can do exactly this. So FromSoftware kind of has that reputation!
Can't really say for Nioh (the combat system and difficulty turned me off in the Apha), but even as a semi casual I have loved Bloodborne and even Platinumed it.
Bloodborne is a masterpiece and the best Souls game imho. Nioh is great but the story isn't that good.So, Im browsing the PS deals and I see these two games on for quite a nice price.
Now I usually avoid thease games like the plague as the percieved difficulty levels put me off. But their settings and worlds are right up my street.
I should say I dont think im a terrible gamer or anything but I have never really played these types of games before. I just usually play games on normal mode and I play alot of RPG games (recently stuff like Horizon, Nier, Hellblade, Witcher, Shadow of Mordor, etc etc)
Im happy to die a bunch and learn patterns of bosses and stuff. But are they so frustratingly hard that more casual gamers like me will be wasting my time and money?
And if not, what would be a better starter into this genre? Bloodborne or Nioh?
Or should I just not bother at all and stick with my casual 3rd person action games, LOL
Wtf am I reading here. Nioh, the game with 6~ types of weapons that come from real life weapons you see in every single melee action game, has more distinct weapons than Bloodborne of all things.
This is like, a literal lie.
Nioh was great....until it became a grindy loot acquiring mess.
Nioh was great....until it became a grindy loot acquiring mess.
The extra difficulties (seriously - there are 5 - FIVE - New Game Plus options) make it 100% focused on loot after the first play through.
In terms of difficulty - if youve played (and enjoyed) the Ninja Gaiden games - and played through those on the different difficulty levels - Nioh will be pretty easy to you. Its opening difficulty is like playing on Hard in NGB for example.
Ive never played the Souls games so I cant speak to them.
Im happy to die a bunch and learn patterns of bosses and stuff.
Which is not until the post game? I never bothered with that crap, platinumed the base game and now I'm in the second DLC area. You can grind but you honestly don't have to to experience the bulk of the game.
Tbh it had 2 difficulties too many.
Nioh was great....until it became a grindy loot acquiring mess.
The extra difficulties (seriously - there are 5 - FIVE - New Game Plus options) make it 100% focused on loot after the first play through.
In terms of difficulty - if youve played (and enjoyed) the Ninja Gaiden games - and played through those on the different difficulty levels - Nioh will be pretty easy to you. Its opening difficulty is like playing on Hard in NGB for example.
Ive never played the Souls games so I cant speak to them.