So this thread gets going again and no one mentions this episode won an Emmy!
Congrats to the people that made it. It is a Fantastic hour+ of TV.
So this thread gets going again and no one mentions this episode won an Emmy!
Congrats to the people that made it. It is a Fantastic hour+ of TV.
Because in this scenario, you're not avoiding the termination of a consciousness.
If my consciousness is copied upon my death and uploaded to a glorious paradise in the cloud, I'm not avoiding death at all. A copy of me is in paradise for eternity while I'm very much dead.
So this thread gets going again and no one mentions this episode won an Emmy!
Congrats to the people that made it. It is a Fantastic hour+ of TV.
If by "you" being dead you mean your physical body no longer exists in the form you recognize, how is that any different than how you live now? Your body now is not even the same one you were born with for all intents and purposes.
I think you've lost everyone
Thought it was a lame episode and if they had used a hetero couple nobody would talk about it.
The entire choice betweenpossibly real or fake computer heaven is meaningless as she died anyway and only a copy was sent to the server. It only benefits the living who connect to the dead, not the dead themselves.
Was like the episode where the cookieis tortured by police after confession, it wasn't the real person who did the crime so what was the point?
My issue with the episode wasthe black lady had stuck to her morals for so long in the episode and for no reason all of a sudden switched her opinion in the last 2 minutes of the episode. She should have just died without going back in. I learned nothing from the episode other than your philosophy and 40 years of marriage or whatever don't mean anything
felt like a student project tbh
My issue with the episode wasthe black lady had stuck to her morals for so long in the episode and for no reason all of a sudden switched her opinion in the last 2 minutes of the episode. She should have just died without going back in. I learned nothing from the episode other than your philosophy and 40 years of marriage or whatever don't mean anything
Thought it was a lame episode and if they had used a hetero couple nobody would talk about it.
The entire choice betweenpossibly real or fake computer heaven is meaningless as she died anyway and only a copy was sent to the server. It only benefits the living who connect to the dead, not the dead themselves.
Was like the episode where the cookieis tortured by police after confession, it wasn't the real person who did the crime so what was the point?
My issue with the episode wasthe black lady had stuck to her morals for so long in the episode and for no reason all of a sudden switched her opinion in the last 2 minutes of the episode. She should have just died without going back in. I learned nothing from the episode other than your philosophy and 40 years of marriage or whatever don't mean anything
She stuck to "her morals" only out of a (misplaced) sense of duty she felt towards her dead daughter and husband. It's a very common thing with us humans; there are people who refuse to have relationships or get married again after their husband or wife dies. Kelly did not for a second believe they were in any sort of spiritual afterlife; they were simply dead. Gone. The end. Period.
In the end, she realized that to not follow her new love to San Junipero would be essentially lying to herself.
To be able to interpret love for your husband and daughter as misplaced sense of duty is odd to begin with, but even if that was the case that wasn't communicated to us in any profound way in the last 2 minutes of the episode
Are we supposed to forget the ones we love(d) and the experiences that lead you up to that point just to be personally satisfied?
That's the message I got from the episode, but it significantly cheapened any sort of philosophical hot take on any of that because it took all of 2 minutes of montage in the episode to flip her belief and 58 minutes explaining why she shouldn't.
I think you've lost everyone
Thought it was a lame episode and if they had used a hetero couple nobody would talk about it.
The entire choice betweenpossibly real or fake computer heaven is meaningless as she died anyway and only a copy was sent to the server. It only benefits the living who connect to the dead, not the dead themselves.
Was like the episode where the cookieis tortured by police after confession, it wasn't the real person who did the crime so what was the point?
"You're" as in referring to me I assume. Well, what am I? And consciousness to me is but a fancy word meaning information and I'm concerned with preservation of information.
If by "you" being dead you mean your physical body no longer exists in the form you recognize, how is that any different than how you live now? Your body now is not even the same one you were born with for all intents and purposes.
So this thread gets going again and no one mentions this episode won an Emmy!
Congrats to the people that made it. It is a Fantastic hour+ of TV.
This is also why the ep is actually (in my view) much more bleak and dark than people give it credit for.
For what could be just a fling and the promise of (temporary) instant gratification with a -guaranty- to know where you are going, Kelly renounces her "true love" as she herself described it and the "possibility" of being reunited with him and their child... All that for the whole but guaranteed certainty that eventually they both will end up as emotionless husks of themselves trapped in a parody version of a forever 1980.
The reality of it, in my opinion, is that San Junipero is Limbo, and is the way to Hell (that club we briefly see) which will happen eventually.
But at least they will have some fun for a while on their way there
I think the point you're overlooking is that if the transfer of the consciousness from one's body to San Junipero is not seamless and is simply a copy/paste job, there is still a death of a consciousness involved.
If one's goal to avoid death, this doesn't avoid death at all. Because one is dying and losing possession of the consciousness they once had in this scenario.
I mean, if one believes in the concept of heaven, what comfort would one get out of knowing that a copy of you is in heaven - not the consciousness you possess right now? You're still going to die, and all heaven would be is a hard drive where a copy of you is stored.
You end, and another you begins. But it's not you. It's another you.
Again, I bring up The Prestige, and I'll spoiler tag for anyone who somehow still hasn't seen that movie:
Angier (Hugh Jackman) copies himself over and over again, and then kills himself over and over again with each new show. One could view this as a form of immortality, but it's not. It's constant suicide over and over again. There's a disconnect between each form of him that's copied; it's not a seamless transfer between each new body and the next. He dies and he's copied. Dies and is copied. Over and over again. That's not immortality. That's death, over and over again.
I think we're kinda talking past each other, but hopefully what I'm saying makes sense. Sure, I get your point about our bodies' cells being regenerated, but we all contain the same consciousness we were born with. If that consciousness dies, we lose it, even if it's copied and digitally stored in a fabulous paradise.
Anyway, I find human obsession with our individuality, on what is "me" and "I" and "self" to be a tad strange
Kind of ironic how they bring up San Junipero and not "Nosedive" which dealt exactly with what the skit was about.
The cells of your body are completely different around every 7 years. In other words, you are made up of completely different material than you were seven years ago. Not one atom is the same.
The cells of your body are completely different around every 7 years. In other words, you are made up of completely different material than you were seven years ago. Not one atom is the same.
There's something to be said for having your thoroughly depressing work end with a bit of joy.
Edit: Please god let that vinyl come to North America.
I'm interested in why you find the human fixation on the nature of what makes us "us" to be strange.
If we learned that every time we went to sleep, we "died", only to be "born" again with all the memories we possessed since birth, but there was nothing we could do about it; I imagine we'd all feel a bit horrified, but no more so than we do knowing that each of us is a gestalt formed by two distinct personalities working symbiotically. It would simply be a fact of life.
However, if we created matter transporting technology that we knew would kill us and replace us with copies every time we used it - even in a world in which we knew the same thing happened every time we slept -very few people would be content to jump on in. It's a SOMA situation. If death is inevitable, most of us don't have much objection to the existence of copies; but if we can choose between continuing to live or dying and being replaced by a copy, most of us care a good deal.
Back to San Junipero, it always makes me a little sad to see people ignoring the far more interesting questions posed by the episode in favour of sidestepping them with "no point, just a copy, so stupid". The show goes out of its way to clear this issue up precisely so we can focus on questions far more interesting than "would you use the transporter in Star Trek?".
Would you choose to roll the dice on ancient folklore, accept the reality of oblivion, or continue to live forever in a man-made afterlife that may drive you mad? I forget what the episode specifies about potential enhancements to the technology, but I feel like the madness side-effect is something human intelligence coulde solve; perhaps with some kind of selective memory purging, or even virtual reincarnation if necessary.
Regardless, another incredible thing about Kelly's decision is that in many ways it's a gift to Yorkie. Not that it's completely altruistic, but I think Kelly is more or less content to die, knowing that it will be the end of her existence. She doesn't necessarily want or need a New Game+ that will likely result in madness. But for Yorkie, San Junipero is her first shot at a normal life. I like to think Kelly's ambivalence about her decision might have been tipped by a desire to give Yorkie something akin to the life she already enjoyed with her husband; her own future well-being be damned.
Which Emmys did it win??Dont forget about the second Emmy that it won as well!
It won for Best Writing in a Limited TV series and also Outstanding TV Movie. Both entirely deserved IMO.Which Emmys did it win??
That episode is all style over substance. There's really nothing interesting in it except very aesthetically pleasing people. It was one of the episodes that felt like Netflix wanted the show to cater to Americans more.
Black Mirror has half a dozen episodes much better.
Nah. Kelly came on to Yorkie and there's certainly attaction and love. She loved before and why deny it now? It's not so much a gift to Yorkie but a realization that she can love again and why deny her happiness? Basically a second chance at love.
Is this series like the twilight zone at all ? Havent watched any eps
Sorry you felt like that. There's a ton going on with death, love, loss, second chances, and a very unique spin on the afterlife. Not to mention perfect chemistry between the leads who sell the whole episode.
You are really short changing it and not sure how you get such a simplistic view on it?
Edit:. And you think that Netflix made this to cater to American audiences? Booker wrote it.
I'm sure he wrote it. I don't think it's a coincidence he decided to write so many episodes with American leads in s3 compared to the others.
As a black mirror episode there's nothing interesting about it. Shut Up And Dance is the perfect example of how the show deals with technology. This felt like the black mirror aspect was inconsequential. As a stand alone TV show it's fine. It's not an especially good black mirror episode.
That episode is all style over substance. There's really nothing interesting in it except very aesthetically pleasing people. It was one of the episodes that felt like Netflix wanted the show to cater to Americans more.
Black Mirror has half a dozen episodes much better.