-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Trailer for The Bourne Ultimatum
- Thread starter bud
- Start date
- Status
Solo said:
me no comprende
Teh Hamburglar said:
I agree that the camera work in batman begins was hectic to say the least, especially during the action scenes. It got to the point where it was difficult to really enjoy the movie and because i kept looking for what was actually going on. It works in the bourne movies imo becuase it's not too hectic while still keeping the documentary style filming.
Also, damon>bale
Identity is better because of the car chase scene, which is incidentally the best car chase in like forever and because they
in Supremacy.
Edit: http://youtube.com/watch?v=dv9BEwvoDoY
kill Marie
Edit: http://youtube.com/watch?v=dv9BEwvoDoY
yoda_is_god029
Member
:loltemp said:
cut-paste much?
rollingstart
Banned
temp said:
:lol
temp said:
Uh, what? The Bond movies were in the shitter, and deserved to bitched out by any self respecting fan. The Bourne movies, on the other hand, have both been great, so people bitching over shit like this is pointless.
Basically, your point would be valid if I was bitching about, say, the cinematography of CR, which I haven't.
Kabuki Waq
Member
Solo said:
exactly. Some Styles suck. This Quick cut style for action is the sucky kind.
Prime crotch
Banned
Peter Jackson?!Solo said:
Kabuki Waq
Member
whytemyke said:
No way but it will dampen the enjoyment for a lot of ppl. Making action scenes seem incoherant and random is not the same same as making them intense and hectic.
No, all Im saying that with all the shit we get that passes for action/thriller movies these days, do we really need to tear down the few franchises that, for the most part, get it right?
Now, perhaps I dont have a grasp on how bad some of you found the camera work, as I never saw the film in theatres, only on DVD, so I'll concede that. Perhaps the big screen would make this movie seem unwatchable.
Now, perhaps I dont have a grasp on how bad some of you found the camera work, as I never saw the film in theatres, only on DVD, so I'll concede that. Perhaps the big screen would make this movie seem unwatchable.
Kabuki Waq
Member
Solo said:
Action is the only aspect that was sub par otherwise no one is tearing the movie down.
Peter Jackson hate is always welcome tho.
So, no but yes? Anyway, if you were saying that people constantly complaining about the shaky cam was annoying then that would be understandable, but defending something using the fact that everything else is good is sort of stupid. I mean, like you said, it does add sort of a real, documentary feel to the movie, but I think they could probably keep that and still tone it down a bit.Solo said:
Prime crotch
Banned
No but slow motion? I would associate a lot of things to Peter Jackson like B-movie director but slow-mo?Solo said:
Solo said:
When you talk about abusing slow-mo, I'd think of Snyder and his 300. That's abusing, not Jackson.
I'd agree about the quick cuts though, you don't need them for documentary style, for either immersion or realism. Not everyone has to do it like Children of Men, but I do think MTV style cuts are as least partly due to a lazy fit-it-in-post attitude. I don't mind cuts as long as they're there for a reason and I know what I'm looking at and where from.
Prime crotch
Banned
I saw every movie by him except King Kong, even Bad Taste and I don't recall any slow motion abuse. You talk like if he was John Woo or something.Solo said:
BuckRobotron
Member
Loved both of the first two, each with its own merits. This and Ratatouille are the two movies I'm most anticipating seeing in theaters this year.
- Status