-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Sony GDC 2010 Press Conference (PS Move, PSWii Sports, PSWii Boxing, PSWii Party)
- Thread starter TTP
- Start date
BurritoBushido
Member
Under $100 for an eye and a move... Im pretty sure that means 99 dollars.
Expensive...
Depressing.
Expensive...
Depressing.
Azure Dream
Member
That just looked like a "Magic!" shot to me, couldn't get the gif out of my head once I saw it.
If Sony can get the buzz going with this and market it well it could be really successful. There are millions of ps3s out there already and that can only be advantageous. But at the same time the mainstream media are going to talk about Natal and thats where Sony could run into problems. I hope they havent priced themselves out as well. Sony need to be super aggressive with the pricing which is something that they that havent done at all yet with the ps3.
Trailblaster
Banned
One cool thing i noticed on the Gamespot feed was the color change of the light when the player got hit. During the sword and sheild game that player got caught by a low slach and the Lights in both his hands when blood red upon impact.
AceBandage
Banned
Er, so wait.
The "Subunit" doesn't have any motion sensing?
Sony....
The "Subunit" doesn't have any motion sensing?
Sony....
To all people screaming "LOL SONY FAIL... 0 originality DOOOOOOOOMMMMMMM BOMB" Sony stated very clearly on the conference that others pioneered with success the motion controlled interface increasing the public that is aware of video games. They just claim that their approach will be better. Wireless interaction between sub-move and the move controller, more accurate, HD graphics.
dragonfart28
Banned
:lol :lol :lolsullyj said:
Seriously guys, anyone who screams copycat should remember that this glowing orb is going back several years to the EyeToy...
If Sony adopted anything from Nintendo, it is the second additional controller, but not the motion control per se.
Nobody remembers that EyeToy demo with the butterfly?
If Sony adopted anything from Nintendo, it is the second additional controller, but not the motion control per se.
Nobody remembers that EyeToy demo with the butterfly?
Nuclear Muffin
Banned
chubigans said:Can you direct link to flickr? Guess we'll find out...
These look like complete shit. Phoenix games esc shit.
Sony have missed the point entirely. They have the hardware, but it's useless if the software isn't up to snuff. This crap will not replicate the success of Wii Sports or any of Nintendo's other games, not by a long shot.
XiaNaphryz
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
They're just pissed off that people who were making fun of them making similar statements are all of a sudden making the same kinds of statements now.fortified_concept said:
But you're correct, bolded should be the main question, especially considering how well peripherals that don't come standard with a system and software supporting them have sold in the past. Only the Wii Balance Board has managed to avoid that curse.
B1gg_Randall
Member
:lol :lol wow..sullyj said:
Shao Kahn Brewing a Stew
Banned
Oh and yes, that Table Tennis game looks awesome. I was expecting Rockstar to port over their Table Tennis game but oh well, this looks similarly awesome.
That said, I hope I can buy the controllers on it own for cheaper as I already own PSEye,
That said, I hope I can buy the controllers on it own for cheaper as I already own PSEye,
at the end of the day though, it'll bring a more diverse software lineup to the PS3 which i'm sure a lot of people will appreciate. the lack of variety in PS3 games was one of the main reasons i sold mine
and it's not a COMPLETE ripoff of the wiimote. there's the camera thing which could be interesting, but at the same time the camera thing is done much better with Natal
the actual motion controls looked a bit shit though. it seemed to be lagging a bit and the cursor was slow as fuck like at E3
and it's not a COMPLETE ripoff of the wiimote. there's the camera thing which could be interesting, but at the same time the camera thing is done much better with Natal
the actual motion controls looked a bit shit though. it seemed to be lagging a bit and the cursor was slow as fuck like at E3
templeusox
Banned
And a game.BurritoBushido said:
GrotesqueBeauty
Banned
And yet there were many people who rolled their eyes and said it would never happen.Souldriver said:
Milk Lizard
Banned
Evolution, bitches.
If I didn't know any better i'd say the black ones are Wii 2. :lol Real shame the sub controller doesn't get rumble though, oh well..grindamasta said:
Still think they should have went with putting a stick on the main controller, especially since they're going with the dual wand setup.. oh well.
Dead Man Typing
Member
GrotesqueBeauty said:
I thought they'd copy the broken controller(Edit: by broken I mean the split controller, nunchuck in one hand wii-mote in the other), I love playing games with my hands separated on Wii, but they didn't go all the way.
If I could use the Move/Submove as a controller for normal PS3 games then I think I could get behind this a little more. That chair sliding action game looks cool, if they'd shown that then maybe I'd feel differently. When E3 rolls around, we'll hopefully have a lot more info on supporting titles, but I don't honestly believe that Sony is serious about motion control. Not with this presentation.
Trailblaster
Banned
BurritoBushido said:
I'm hoping it means $79.99 because As cool as i think this thing is 80 bucks is the most I and many other people will play for it.
dragonflys545
Member
shagg_187 said:
Yup you can buy it stand alone if you own the PS eye
Q
qizah
Unconfirmed Member
So, it's a Wiimote and MotionPlus in one device.
Cool, I guess. Though that demographic generally .. doesn't like motion controlled gaming.
Cool, I guess. Though that demographic generally .. doesn't like motion controlled gaming.
http://i41.tinypic.com/15nuhyq.jpg
From which of this 2 can you use to play a fighting game? Still Arc is more better than move, imo.
From which of this 2 can you use to play a fighting game? Still Arc is more better than move, imo.
Not a Jellyfish
but I am a sheep
radioheadrule83
Banned
GrotesqueBeauty said:
I'm not feeling too sorry for Nintendo... they knew this was coming
Iwata said:
Reggie Fils-Aime said:
Honestly, I think there's a bigger case for Nintendo here than Apple has with HTC... the plagiarism in the sub-controller promo photo is hilarious. They copied right down to the positioning of the wrist strap. At the end of the day, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. And Nintendo can't really do anything if they don't own tech/patents. Even if they did, Sony's solution does the same things but in a different way. Its like a Motion+ / Natal half breed. I am interested in seeing the kind of support this gets at E3, and I'm very interested in how Nintendo will now co-ordinate their response.
RE4 wii was the definitive version, so I'll definitely be picking up at least one Move + Sub Remote just to play RE5 and stuff.
Shao Kahn Brewing a Stew
Banned
Hiltz said:
Good. I own a 360. If Natal delivers, I'm getting it. Oh and last I checked, we were comparing Wiimote with Move.
+1 for me and my consoles.
-1 for your fanboyism and your dusty Wii.
yurinka
Member
Yes, Nintendo's innovations:GrotesqueBeauty said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV5bAjBlCik&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFIgtR8zGb8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlGbDD1Vjjc
XiaNaphryz
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
No, but at least Sony can say they can match Nintendo in missing inputs during a fighting/boxing game.Raist said:
Christ, can both sides drop the console warrior bullshit and just agree to condemn the casualware development overall?
You in particular damnit!shagg_187 said:
