That seems pretty close to being accurate. For me, it's 2/5 owners. I know one other that posts here, and 3 others that don't.I have a friend who lurks here and 2 others who as far as I know doesn't know what Gaf is.
They both own Vitas.
1/4 owners has a gaf account
Its ridiculous and totally misses the mark
Rather than be confrontational why not solicit a more humble approach?
Its not Sony's fault if there are licensing issues. These companies sit on mountains of old and unkept license agreements on old software all the time
I hope times are changing though and I think Sony has been actively working on it behind the scenes
didn't intend it as something to blame Sony
I was hoping it to be something that Sony can use to show the publishers "hey look, gamers out there still want to play the games from previous generations. let's work it out so that people can play their old favorites on the Vita"
Its ridiculous and totally misses the mark
Rather than be confrontational why not solicit a more humble approach?
Its not Sony's fault if there are licensing issues. These companies sit on mountains of old and unkept license agreements on old software all the time
I hope times are changing though and I think Sony has been actively working on it behind the scenes
We don't know this btw. They were certainly able to get the agreements for the PS3 and PSP easily enough. I still think they just can't be arsed to get them for Vita. They are, at this point, the biggest and most important platform holder. If they wanted to get these license agreements from third parties I think they can.
I'm still a little bit hopeful that they actually have got them, in preparation to launch PSNow, and just blew their load early.
I refuse to believe that there were people who were planning on buying a Vita, but now aren't, because they can't play Crash Bandicoot games from the 90s on it.
Eh.. I bought the Sega MegaDrive collection at least. I won't be able to re-download it though, will I?
So it was an intentional lockout all along?
What a joke.
Only people being willfully ignorant ever though these games weren't on the store because of an actual technical issue.
I hope this comes around and bites them in the ass. Sony doesn't want to put the work/time/money into shoring up the availability of their back catalog and hope to sell PSNow to the masses on the back of the comparatively (to PS1) lackluster PS3 library and current PS4 library so grandma and grandpa can play "The Last of Uncharted 4" on their iPad? Good luck with that. When they fail at that like the company has been failing at most things outside videogames and try to come crawling back and give us access to the back library us core gamers have been begging for for years some of won't give a damn anymore and won't give them the time of day.
nevermind the PS1 games don't even run an emulator designed for the vita, they're running in backwards compatible mode as well!!
So there's zero excuses for this bullshit.
People who bought the games should be refunded.
Only people being willfully ignorant ever though these games weren't on the store because of an actual technical issue.
I hope this comes around and bites them in the ass. Sony doesn't want to put the work/time/money into shoring up the availability of their back catalog and hope to sell PSNow to the masses on the back of the comparatively (to PS1) lackluster PS3 library and current PS4 library so grandma and grandpa can play "The Last of Uncharted 4" on their iPad? Good luck with that. When they fail at that like the company has been failing at most things outside videogames and try to come crawling back and give us access to the back library us core gamers have been begging for for years some of won't give a damn anymore and won't give them the time of day.
People who bought the games should be refunded.
I'm guessing if there's no record of this even being a thing, then sony has no obligation to refund anything. I can just imagine customer service now "sir, that content has never been available for download on the ps vita! And unfortunately we cannot offer refunds on digital purchases. Please feel free to buy a playstation 3 or a Sony psp go to enjoy your purchased titles. Is there anything else I can help you with today?"People who bought the games should be refunded.
I'm guessing if there's no record of this even being a thing, then sony has no obligation to refund anything. I can just imagine customer service now "sir, that content has never been available for download on the ps vita! And unfortunately we cannot offer refunds on digital purchases. Please feel free to buy a playstation 3 or a Sony psp go to enjoy your purchased titles. Is there anything else I can help you with today?"
People who bought the games should be refunded.
Only people being willfully ignorant ever though these games weren't on the store because of an actual technical issue.
I hope this comes around and bites them in the ass. Sony doesn't want to put the work/time/money into shoring up the availability of their back catalog and hope to sell PSNow to the masses on the back of the comparatively (to PS1) lackluster PS3 library and current PS4 library so grandma and grandpa can play "The Last of Uncharted 4" on their iPad? Good luck with that. When they fail at that like the company has been failing at most things outside videogames and try to come crawling back and give us access to the back library us core gamers have been begging for for years some of won't give a damn anymore and won't give them the time of day.
You should be ok. That was actually working before all of this.
People damning Sony here probably need to realize that they don't control the licenses to all of these games. They're not going to say anything on this matter because they probably pissed off some people royally with this accident, assuming that's what it was.
Oh, cool..
Tho maybe Sony should have a different licensing, where if you are releasing on PSN, you are also making your content available to all compatible products. Price your content accordingly if you are so afraid of getting extra sales for some reason.
You should be ok. That was actually working before all of this.
People damning Sony here probably need to realize that they don't control the licenses to all of these games. They're not going to say anything on this matter because they probably pissed off some people royally with this accident, assuming that's what it was.
The games were never officially announced for Vita or even available for purchase as Vita titles, so there's some iffiness to that argument. You still got access to them on the advertised platforms they worked on (PSP, PS3).
The Vita did not exist when most of these content deals were made
The games were never officially announced for Vita or even available for purchase as Vita titles, so there's some iffiness to that argument. You still got access to them on the advertised platforms they worked on (PSP, PS3).
Do you really believe the success of the Vita hangs on a PS1 launch title?Sony, please fix this so that your amazing handheld has a chance to regain some tiny measure of success before it's forgotten completely. Thank you.
Yeah, I'm aware, and by compatible, I meant compatible products [even in future]. As long as your 10 year old game is selling on a new platform at a price you agree on, why would that be a problem?
Maybe that sort of license could also mean a slightly better % return, to make such a licensing deal more appealing to publishers. I dunno, I'm sure such a flexible deal could exist.
Yeah, I'm aware, and by compatible, I meant compatible products [even in future]. As long as your 10 year old game is selling on a new platform at a price you agree on, why would that be a problem?
Maybe that sort of license could also mean a slightly better % return, to make such a licensing deal more appealing to publishers. I dunno, I'm sure such a flexible deal could exist.
most people don't like licensing stuff into perpetuity. In theory, if Sony were to make 100 more Playstation devices over the next 300 years, that same deal would still apply. Inflation is a real thing over long periods of time.
Publishers likely don't like the idea of signing away a game to a company like Sony with a clause that allows them to sell it anywhere they want. They are going to want to approve of any platform the game is offered on. Sometime in the future Sony makes a new phone that suddenly lets you play some obscure PSP game? It doesn't seem like a bad idea as long as they get paid, but you never know.
Certain titles also have their own licensing concerns themselves, like music, or a game based off an IP which has an expiration. Some of these publishers also don't own the IP fully so they can't just sign away the title
everyone who is calling sony stupid and shitty
do you honestly think they're just blocking you from playing these games for some fucking arbitrary reason?
i think its safe to say they would ABSOLUTELY sell you all these games if they could.
get mad at the publishers who own the rights to these games for not licensing them for vita
obviously everything just magically working was a bug, and you're kind of naive to think all it took was sony to "stop being lazy and flip the switch on all games". those games were unavailable for a reason. a legal one, not a technical one
i feel sad. Why won't they make Phantasy Star Portable 2 available for sale?
Do you really believe the success of the Vita hangs on a PS1 launch title?