Amazing
When big publishers take over studios, the creative talent leaves....every time, and the future games suffer as a result.
Amazing
No, they won't. Phil Spencer out right said they won't. Also the PS userbase is growing and it's only smaller because it hasn't been around as long and with the PS4 version it will continue to grow a lot.Comparatively speaking when compared with Xbox, PC, and mobile it doesn't. They'll forego that relatively small market in order to push Minecraft as Xbone console exclusive.
LOL
CEO Kaz Hirai ‏@KazHiraiCEO 2m
Mojang still plan to release Minecraft Vita, meaning Microsoft now has more big name PS Vita games planned than we have
Amazing
Amazing
Amazing
Amazing
Microsoft becomes third party and publish titles on Playstation.
So with Notch leaving, this is basically 2.5 billion for the name "Minecraft". Seems crazy.
Can someone tell me why you'd buy a company when the key talent leaves? I don't get this at all.
When big publishers take over studios, the creative talent leaves....every time, and the future games suffer as a result.
Thats exactly what mincecraft is going to be morphed into, while keeping its sandbox.
Originally Posted by lmbotiva
Classy as fuck MS, the fact they're still supporting the other platforms is super smart and very humbling, hats off to you Phil
If only they treated the TR franchise with such class and humbleness.
Huh?I hate the game . . .
Because they are competitors. Minecraft on Playstation benefits Microsoft more than it does Sony. Take that away and it's millions of potential sales lost.Sure they will let Microsoft on their platfrom. Why the fuck wouldn't they? What you just said makes no sense at all.
Because they are competitors. Minecraft on Playstation benefits Microsoft more than it does Sony. Take that away and it's millions of potential sales lost.
I HAVE NEVER EVER SEEN A THREAD SUGGESTING NINTENDO SHOULD GO THIRD PARTY
Billions>>>>>>millions
I don't think he'll give a second thought to Minecraft after this.
The only way a move like this makes sense to me is if MS intend to 'extend' the Minecraft brand and game into more of a pseudo Facebook style platform.
If not..., ? I really have no idea.
Thats exactly what minecraft is going to be morphed into, while keeping its sandbox.
The only way a move like this makes sense to me is if MS intend to 'extend' the Minecraft brand and game into more of a pseudo Facebook style platform.
If not..., ? I really have no idea.
Because they are competitors. Minecraft on Playstation benefits Microsoft more than it does Sony. Take that away and it's millions of potential sales lost.
......and boom goes the dynamite.
I just hope the Vita version drops soon.
And that all non MS-platforms will be still supported.
I still don't get what's the point of actually buying Mojang. Sounds like a colossal waste of money.
I think the game is terrible, but debating it would be considered off-topic, so I'll leave it at that.Huh?
Can't believe this guy. He always cracks top Notch jokes!
Minecraft Type-0
Basically this. Notch suckered M$ into accepting the deal.I still don't get what's the point of actually buying Mojang. Sounds like a colossal waste of money.
Why post in the first place?I think the game is terrible, but debating it would be considered off-topic, so I'll leave it at that.
I think MS works to merge the two. Combine the Dakota team with Mojang and you have an IP to back your game SDK. People already build their own pseudo-games within Minecraft. If you leave Minecraft for the most part alone and layer an SDK on top of it you may have something there.
This is exactly their idea, I believe. We're not just talking gaming/merchandising here. This is Microsoft's way to get kids into Windows. It's a dream educational platform that Mojang really accidentally made.
Amazing
The 2.5 billion dollar question, however, is how does microsoft incentivize that migration without committing brand assassination?
Too similar and people will stick to minecraft 1, too different and they risk losing what made it popular.