It's not the same at all.
It's very difficult for sex workers to move on after working in the business. They usually have to keep their past a secret or risk getting fired. It often forces them to go back into sex work.
I find it hypocritical that a man's sexual history is rarely brought up when it comes to relationships but if a woman isn't "pure" then that makes her undesireable as a partner.
This is a tough thing emotionally. Philosophically, I agree with you. I have no issue with people having sex with as many people as they want. Especially when you aren't in that exclusive relationship anymore.
But there is something, about someone having sex with a ton of people in a single day just to get money. I guess I'm a hypocrite. I would feel the same way about a male prostitute too.
Strange enough, I'm not even that prude when it comes to sex workers, or a partner having slept with many people prior to not being in a relationship with me. I don't really know why the stigma of selling yourself for sex exists. Why it feels wrong to me, and is hard to deal with emotionally. Maybe it's just a social construct. You know, sometimes how you feel or think about something, is heavily ingrained based on concepts that have been pushed your entire life (prostitution = bad and immoral). I'm not even religious, or view sex at this sacred act lol
I do agree that we need to stop this bullshit about women being "pure". It's non-sense. Women have every right to have sex as much as men do. People (not gender) like having sex. The whole "pure" thing is really terrible. And I do think Men need to get over it, and stop letting it bother their ego. I do understand in some cases, it's a concern with regards to STDs and all that (sexual history can matter with that regard). But I do think for the most part, it has to do with the whole pure/ego thing more then the safety aspect (especially when the partner is clean).
And that is bad. But yeah, I dunno. Sometimes I'm ashamed when I don't have a grasp on why I feel certain ways about something.