XANDER CAGE
Member
Huh, I'd totally forgotten that my video card was only 2GB. Right now I have a choice between playing my PS4 copy with great textures and 30fps, or the PC version with ass textures and 60fps. Hmm.
This game has absolutely fantastic SLi scaling. My 2x980s are handling everything maxxed at 1440p, 2xMSAA, 2x shadow MSAA, TXAA, and Softest shadows + everything else (desnsity, etc) maxed and pumping 60-70 FPS driving and 75-100 FPS on foot on my 120hz 1440p Korean monitor.
It's a thing of beauty. I wish all PC games got this level of care and polish. Good going, Rockstar.
I thought you only had 2 TitanXs? That doesn't make any sense. With just a single TitanX, 2560x1440 with 2xMSAA hovers between 60-70. 4K drops to 40-45. But you're getting more than double that performance with 4xMSAA. Can't be that the CPU is making that much difference....
Maybe I gotta do a fresh driver install and see if that helps.
Can you post some Youtube video at 1080p60 ? I'll watch it using my lowly PeasantStation 4 and its Youtube App
GTA V @ 5K w/ 4x GTX TITAN X maxed out every setting (No MSAA but 8x Reflection MSAA):
Dat scaling!
Sorry if this has been asked, but how do people get the 60Hhz option to appear?
I'm playing through my Sony KDL60W850B and the highest it shows is 59Hz..
Anyone tried 4K with a single 970? Naturally I'm not expecting to max it out or something but I'm interested if you could push 4k60 with some toned down settings as the game seems to be fairly scalable.
http://i.imgur.com/VFSB8wr.jpg?1
Yeah, I have a great CPU but my old GPU is absolutely limiting my rig. This 2GB 7850 doesn't do an i7 justice, I can't even run the textures on High, they exceed my VRAM by 100MB...
MSAA destroys performance, and although I have to set some settings on Normal, I can get 60fps @ 1080p most of the time with others on High or Very High.
Seriously, AMD, hurry up with your new GPUs, what the hell...
This port is blowing my mind with how smooth it is. The delays were certainly worth it. Haven't had a single crash or any issue at all.
Huh, I'd totally forgotten that my video card was only 2GB. Right now I have a choice between playing my PS4 copy with great textures and 30fps, or the PC version with ass textures and 60fps. Hmm.
Normal textures often look really bad. Worse than I remember of the 360 version. I feel like there should be another option between that and high that doesn't require 700mb more.
GeForce Experience is recommending that I turn more settings up... How accurate is this thing usually and what FPS does it shoot for?
Has the amd drivers been released?
GeForce Experience is recommending that I turn more settings up... How accurate is this thing usually and what FPS does it shoot for?
Most people here seem to have a 970 or better cards and the few posts i saw so far of people who have 2GB cards report worse textures than the ....360/PS3 version??
Is this true?
Most people here seem to have a 970 or better card and the few posts i saw so far of people who have 2GB cards report worse textures than the ....360/PS3 version??
Is this true?
Sorry for the stupid question but...where is this benchmark tool everyone is talking about?
Most people here seem to have a 970 or better card and the few posts i saw so far of people who have 2GB cards even report worse textures than the ....360/PS3 version??
Is this true?
Any tips on what eats up most VRAM except textures? Will i be able to at least use high quality if i play at 720p?
I have a GTX 960 GPU
It shoots for 40ish FPS. It was playable when I used the settings but I toned things down in order to get a more stable frame rate.
It's a Hit or Miss with their settings. For AC:U, GE had settings that demolish my fps.
Thanks. Is there a in between setting for the textures? For the sake of choice. And if yes, how does it look?Lower population variety to be able to use Very High textures on 2GB.
In the graphics settings.
Thanks. Is there a in between setting for the textures? For the sake of choice. And if yes, how does it look?
Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.2Ghz
AMD Radeon R9 270
8GB DDR3 RAM
I've been playing it with the mostly default settings (I changed the resolution to my monitor's native 1680x1050; FXAA only, Vsync on, soft shadows off, Normal Textures), and it's quite playable, with some periodic framedrops while driving.
Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.2Ghz
AMD Radeon R9 270
8GB DDR3 RAM
I've been playing it with the mostly default settings (I changed the resolution to my monitor's native 1680x1050; FXAA only, Vsync on, soft shadows off, Normal Textures), and it's quite playable, with some periodic framedrops while driving.
Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200)
DX Feature Level: 11.0
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz (12 CPUs), ~3.2GHz
65536MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 4071MB, Driver Version 350.12
Graphics Card Vendor Id 0x10de with Device ID 0x13c0
Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg
Pass 0, 23.863594, 67.281525, 45.835091
Pass 1, 19.776409, 42.877789, 27.954981
Pass 2, 22.536249, 144.588654, 44.193604
Pass 3, 22.931469, 85.552666, 47.649090
Pass 4, 5.458716, 144.882721, 42.365742
Frames Per Second (Higher is better) Min, Max, Avg
Pass 0, 27.279480, 76.738525, 60.037552
Pass 1, 24.799698, 79.687111, 47.040897
Pass 2, 30.496918, 108.220184, 64.064629
Pass 3, 22.336733, 111.394318, 68.908630
Pass 4, 23.531292, 150.331573, 58.097271
Alright, I think I've found my sweet spot for settings already.
3570k@4.2Ghz
MSI GTX970(factory stock)
8GB DDR3
Windows 7
1080p monitor
I'll take some comparison shots here soon.
Performance is absolutely insane. I've personally never seen an open world game of this scope run this well and look this good. Even on my middle-of-the-road 2 GB GTX 770 I'm pulling a constant 60 FPS from beginning through to the end of Franklin's first mission and some nighttime driving.
Last batch for me tonight. Countryside, draw distance, and night time.
Countryside does hit the frame rate into the lower 40's but more than playable. Game looks phenomenal in motion. Could push more settings but I do enjoy 60fps most of the time.
Night time scenic coolness
As noted, these are 1440p with maxed settings minus 2xMSAA since it eats up more VRAM with 4x.
Mine shows up as 8GB, uses every bit of it so that's why I turn MSAA to x2.
Ok thanks, i will use a similar setting to yours then.There is Normal, High, and Very High. Not sure what you mean. I have my population variety at 50%, and textures at very high, and they look great.
I have a 2GB GTX 680 and I'm able to run Very High textures without issue. Yeah, it says it's over max VRAM, but it still lets me choose it and I haven't had a single issue with hitching or stuttering that you'd normally see from maxed out VRAM texture swapping. It doesn't seem to be swapping in lower textures; I played through the first chapter with recommended settings and couldn't get past how muddy everything looked. Now things are quite crisp and detailed. I don't really know what's up; is the game just overestimating how much VRAM usage you'll actually see with maxed out textures? Or can I expect issues at some point down the road, even if I haven't hit it yet?
Don't know about maxing absolutely everything. Haven't tried it and I probably wont bother. Certain things I really just don't care about enough. I'd be surprised if I could with all the advanced settings, though. There's some pretty costly stuff here.Pretty cool, thanks! My rig is almost the same, but I am rocking a non oced 3770k@3,5 instead.
Can you max everything @1080p/60fps with MSAAx2, or would you have dips?
It's not incompatible, it just means it will cost more in performance.So this game uses MSAA. I thought it is incompatible with deferred renderers?