If they don't own the IP I can kinda understand, but if they own it that shady ass fuck
Except for Syphon Filter
Right I am very confused here.Jesus crust can anyone read it says this is about third party relations not fucking first party. And once again Sony is not getting the kickstarter ones from the shenmue kickstarter Yu irt is all there. Stop with the bullshit.
Look at my history I objected vehemently to their announcing a kickstarter for Shenmue as well. They are a publisher. IMO, If they like a game and want to support it they should find it themselves not exploit their position and consumer loyalty/fan base to jumpstart a kickstarter.
SILENT HILLS!!!!!! DO IT SONY YOU KNOW YOU WANT TOO! PLEASE
Crazy idea...what if Sony just funded the games?
THISKickstart a new Suikoden.
If they don't own the IP I can kinda understand, but if they own it that shady ass fuck
Except for Syphon Filter
Can one of the naysayers explain why this is bad?
Patapon for the Vita
Wipeout for the PS4
Burnout whereever
Dark Cloud 3 for the PS4
What a load of bollocks. I guess the demise of an entirety segment of this industry (B tier devs and publishers) has just been a big ruse. Their downfall and the risk of publishing these games was manufactured so that years later a company called Kickstarter could rise up and people would send them money because what a great way to con people out of their stacks of cash. Shenmue 3? Nah, no risk there. Those games sold like hotcakes back in 1999-2001.It's extortion, a hostage situation. "Give us X dollars or you'll never see your favourite game again!" All that would be missing is for the Kickstarter to have a picture of the franchise hero with a beaten face holding up a picture of a recent newspaper to really bring the reality into the situation there.
And the fact that it's being discussed to happen again alone tells me everything I need to know about how this is going to turn out. What defines a "risky" idea for a game will be stretched thinner and thinner and thinner.
The Kickstarter would have to be set to at least one billion dollars.Silent Hills.
Make that shit happen Sony.
It's extortion, a hostage situation. "Give us X dollars or you'll never see your favourite game again!" All that would be missing is for the Kickstarter to have a picture of the franchise hero with a beaten face holding up a picture of a recent newspaper to really bring the reality into the situation there.
And the fact that it's being discussed to happen again alone tells me everything I need to know about how this is going to turn out. What defines a "risky" idea for a game will be stretched thinner and thinner and thinner.
You are gonna be sooooo sad when I tell you who owns that IP lol
Why are those games dead in the first place? Oh, because no one buys them that's why. If anything, this crowdfunding is for all of the fans to walk the walk instead of talk the talk, just look at Bayo 2 and how horribly it bombed.
Yeah I'm honestly concerned. I could handle this every year or two for something a vocal minority wants as a way to test if there's real interest. Shenmue is ok with me. But if every old IP revival requires a Kickstarter and they become a way to hold people hostage and offload costs onto consumers? I'm not ok with that. So I'm skeptical about this.
Some of you need to stop telling others what to do with their money.
If people are OK putting up funds for a Kickstarter that's backed by Sony - who are you to tell them they can't?
The money is VOLUNTARILY handed over in EXCHANGE for the GAME and BONUS REWARDS
In fact, usually backing a game nets you it for cheaper than retail, and you're entitled to all sorts of tier bonuses you wouldn't normally get.
THE LEGEND OF DRAGOON PLZ
You're still getting a copy of the game. Why it's being suggested that "costs are being offloaded" to consumers I have no idea.
You are literally just preordering it.
Sure, that worked well for Shenmue for the last 15 years.
Can one of the naysayers explain why this is bad?
You're still getting a copy of the game. Why it's being suggested that "costs are being offloaded" to consumers I have no idea.
You are literally just preordering it. What's the difference if Sony funds it 100% up front, and collects your payment after, or instead collects your payment before and then uses it to make the game? It's simply risk control for them.
No, you're preordering a promise. There's no actual game, just a promise of one. How that game turns out? Who the fuck knows? And if it's bad, you can't take ever get your money back.
SE is doing exactly this with The Collective, and as long as it's completely upfront, I see no problems with it. If people want to continue to enjoy their shiny big budget games, something has to give. Development budgets are growing increasingly more ludicrous to the point that a single failure can shutter a studio.Honestly this is a very slippery slope to go down. Shenmue 3 is one thing, but I hope we don't see the random IPs that probably could be financially viable on their own accord kickstarted because- "Why not?"
Anyway, Kojima "will" be a free agent sooner or later, looks like his project is about to get Kickstarted into the sun.
Because it's a way for Sony to hold a game hostage.
It reminds me of F2P whale hunting.
It's not like it's absolutely bad in all scenarios but it going sour and becoming a constant thing and destroying itself at the expense of consumers seems like a very real risk to me.
Well, there it is.
It will/has basically become a platform for developers to audition for publishers.
Which is funny because it started out as a platform for developers to be free from publishers.
The publishers will always win.
Not to be trite, but why not? If something like this helps someone with a huge pile of money to be more comfortable about financing a potentially risky project, isn't that a good thing?Honestly this is a very slippery slope to go down. Shenmue 3 is one thing, but I hope we don't see the random IPs that probably could be financially viable on their own accord kickstarted because- "Why not?"
Those seem to be largely unrelated to this, and I'm not even sure what the third thing is. I don't see any problem with DLC. If you do, there's certainly nothing forcing you to buy it. Pre-order bonuses seem like a way to thank players for buying a game sight unseen. Again, if you're wary, don't participate.1. DLC
2. "Exclusive preorder bonuses"
3. On disc content
I only pledged $29, and since the campaign was successful, that's gonna give me a copy of the game. Sounds like a reasonably good deal to me. Saying something like, "Sure, I'll give you $50M if you can raise $2M on your own in a month," doesn't strike me as inherently evil. I see how this could be amazing, but can you expand on the "potentially awful" bit? What exactly is the nightmare scenario here? =/And a plethora of other examples of publishers locking things behind premium paywalls nickel and diming consumers. Gamers are a very passionate bunch, I just don't want to see us as a community exploited. There are those of us well to do who can afford to submit one thousand dollars to Shenmue 3 and the ilk, but this Kickstarter philosophy can be either really amazing or really awful, and so far I'm not liking the odds where I trust a mega corporation with enough integrity to not ape me of all my income.