• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony is Building a Hostage Crisis!!!!! (List of Games to Kickstarter)

Ishan

Junior Member
In good news on neogaf ... Reporting from ground zero I Ishan journalist extraordinaire can confirm ... the mods have gotten over the shock of e3 and are back to their joke making ways :)
 

Sendou

Member
If people are foolish enough to pay then why shouldn't they? I mean they would probably like to release every game with less risks if possible. Not that I'm complaining. People seem to like the way Shenmue 3 was handled and I'm still getting the game they're paying for so it's all good.
 

Hyunashi

Member
im so down for this. I love all the concern and tears around this though. As long as I can get sequels to games i used to play (like Dark Cloud or any JRPG TBH), ill support it.
 
This really is an interesting thread.

Half of the people see their dreams come true.

The other half sees their nightmares come true.

What a funny day.
 
As long as I can revive dormant IPs while paying less than half the price I would pay for a game these days I'm all for it.

Also, Gio/Shuhei, look at my avy. Please.
 

Game Guru

Member
There are two inevitable outcomes from increase risk aversion:

  1. Stagnation leading to an inevitable collapse

    OR
  2. a market correction wherein risk becomes more acceptable.
The current market state is temporary and its precisely because they can rely on stop gaps and risk mitigators like this kickstarter market test strategy that the cerebral state continues. Absent these down the road following a steep decline in growth/profits we would start to see a handful of publishers start to take more risk because they feel forced to do so and would have little to lose thanks to market stagnation. This risk, in a stagnating market, would (should) drive consumer support and lead to success prompting other previously risk averse parties to follow suit. That correction cannot occur so long as publishers are afforded more and more ways to mitigate risk at the cost of the consumer. Instead, if allowed to continue, it would lead to decreasing consumer satisfaction culminating in market wide backlash and collapse.

TLDR: Risk Stop gaps (often at the cost of consumer) are prolonging the current risk averse state of the market not alleviating it .

I want to address this particular comment because the two points about risk aversion causing either stagnation leading to an inevitable collapse or a market correction wherein risk becomes more acceptable is true, but that using Kickstarter to see if there is a market for a game is the market correcting to make risk more acceptable.

The issues the gaming industry has to do specifically with the amount of money customers are willing to pay up front. The majority of customers are unwilling to pay at the prices needed to sell a video game at. This is why the gaming industry focuses on those willing to pay upfront and to pay for extra content in the games. This is why pre-orders are pushed, DLC and microtransactions are made, and why game companies hunt the whales. The people who buy used games and don't buy DLC or microtransactions may as well not exist to publishers because they aren't paying publishers money. People who buy Humble Bundles for $1 are practically giving pennies to the developers. These people are not customers a developer can make money off of but are becoming all too prevalent in the gaming industry. Using Kickstarter in this way is also focusing on people willing to pay for upfront as well. Given how much funding the Shenmue III Kickstarter has gotten and how many people paid into it, the game would cost $80 as that is the average amount that 40,000 people paid for it. In reality, half of those people paid $29, enough to ensure they got a copy of the game.

To be fair, this could end up being misused... but on a personal level, Kickstarters have been getting me various game related things that I actually want to buy. I mean, both the microconsole and VR came about as things because of Kickstarters proving there is a market for them. In addition, it's also getting me games on PCs and console that interest me as a gamer from both indies and from larger developers who have a history behind them, and now it's done the impossible in making Shenmue III a reality. Again, while this could end up being misused, I'm not going to question it so long as I'm still benefiting from it with games I want. You could call it me being greedy as a customer, but I like to think of it as enlightened self-interest.
 
If people are foolish enough to pay then why shouldn't they? I mean they would probably like to release every game with less risks if possible. Not that I'm complaining. People seem to like the way Shenmue 3 was handled and I'm still getting the game they're paying for so it's all good.

You know that you'll have to pay for the game too right? And most of the kickstarter tiers include a Shenmue 3 copy of the game.
 

panda-zebra

Member
Suikoden and Shining Force with original creator. do it.

do it now.

Just looking at the thread title (the original one, lol) I told myself no, that Shenmue III was a special case and that was that. Of course, inside I was already #buildingthelist along with almost everyone else.

Now I come back to the thread and see these kinds of games being mentioned (in amongst the silliness) I have to be honest with myself - while I might not be willing to throw $300 in the direction of games like those, I won't lie and pretend I wouldn't support them full stop.

If it helps bring back games or genres that no longer seem to make sense financially, and if it can be conducted in an open and fair manner, I can see myself rethinking my attitude to kickstarter and look forward to games that have no right to exist in 2015 and beyond.
 

Aliand

Banned
Please fund an old style SSX, I'll dip on!

That and a Jedi Knight game... Put that Battlefront partnership to the next level!

And Syphon filter!

And Crash Bandicoot too please!

Come on Sony!
 

Sendou

Member
You know that you'll have to pay for the game too right? And most of the kickstarter tiers include a Shenmue 3 copy of the game.

Paying for the game as in paying for the development. Nobody knows what kind of game they're getting when they put money down for Shenmue 3 right now. It's 2 and half years away at least. Something unexpected might happen. It might suck. It might even be cancelled. I just have found out that waiting for the final product I have more information on which to base my purchase decision. I also realize that my opinion would probably be different if Shenmue 3 was something I'd anticipated for a decade. Not that it doesn't expect to other games. I had big hopes for Kickstarter when it started and I do realize it has given us some games that we wouldn't have gotten otherwise but I'm not ready to take risk that belongs to publishers while they reap the real benefits.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Oh god I read the title as "Sony building in hostage crisis" and freaked out for a bit. Damned mods and thier tomfoolery!
 
Honestly? I'm not even mad. Sure, it's going to kind of fuck with indies to an extent, and there should probably be measures made to give indies their own platform on Kickstarter, but as long as this is Sony trying to resurrect once-dead IPs, I'm all for it. Especially if the IPs aren't their own.
 
That's pretty.much stating the obvious. I think, and hope, no-one is that naive to believe so.

Personally, I'm not entirely sure that's the case. And I think it is less about naivety and more about brand loyalty. I very much agree with your other point that the end result is positive.
 

chocoedd

Member
I don't mind if dead franchises can come back again like Shenmue 3. Please take more hostage. I'll gladly pay for their ransom. Beyond the Beyond HD Remake please come true.
 
Paying for the game as in paying for the development. Nobody knows what kind of game they're getting when they put money down for Shenmue 3 right now. It's 2 and half years away at least. Something unexpected might happen. It might suck. It might even be cancelled. I just have found out that waiting for the final product I have more information on which to base my purchase decision. I also realize that my opinion would probably be different if Shenmue 3 was something I'd anticipated for a decade. Not that it doesn't expect to other games. I had big hopes for Kickstarter when it started and I do realize it has given us some games that we wouldn't have gotten otherwise but I'm not ready to take risk that belongs to publishers while they reap the real benefits.

Okay, but what does this have to do with "being foolish enough to pay" exactly?

Or is this is a continuation of the stupid "don't pre-order" notion.
 

Piccoro

Member
I wish GAF was around in 1989. I'd love to have seen the negativity when the Berlin Wall came down.

It's getting kind of embarrassing,really... Other websites are beginning to talk about us :/

I mean, a game that people are begging for 14 years finally gets released, and suddenly lots of salty people are throwing random negativity at it...
 
LMAO! people suddenly discoved that humans use value-exchange. SHOCKING NEWS!

IMO the kickstarter was used in order to determine the budget of the game in relation to the demand.

When a publisher is making a game (especially a new IP) they don't know what the ratio of budget/investment should be in relation to the demand of the consumers.

There was a big demand for Shenmue 3 and the numbers show it. There must be other IPs that people are willing to pay and Kickstarter is a valuable test platform to determine the demand in relation to the budget.
 

Roronoa95

Member
Jedi Knight
X-Wing Alliance
Road Rash
Micro-Machines
Soul Reaver
Urban Chaos

the sad thing is I know it won't happen at all :(
 
As for the 'proper' use of Kickstarter, I have this to say: there isn't one. Kickstarter is a service, a way of getting projects off the ground. Game developers may have entered Kickstarter through the desire to free themselves from the shackles of big publishers and make the games they really want to make but nowadays it seems to also be used as a way of attracting more funds in order to finance more ambitious projects.It may be antithetical to the original point of Kickstarter in theory but I think it is a logical evolution. It may (and probably will) turn ugly at some point, almost every new trend in gaming ends up getting exploited and milked. I just hope we'll get some good games before the inevitable ugly end.
 

Melchiah

Member
This really is an interesting thread.

Half of the people see their dreams come true.

The other half sees their nightmares come true.

What a funny day.

Shenmue comes for the PS4

Shenmue comes for the PS4

That's the way I see it as well. In light of the recent Dreamcast thread, where the same old bitterness from 14 years ago raised its head, it seems this might have something to do with Shenmue going to PS platform. Leading people to grasp for a reason to paint it in a negative light. It makes me wonder how the reactions would have been if the platform had been something else?



EDIT:
Personally, I'm not entirely sure that's the case. And I think it is less about naivety and more about brand loyalty. I very much agree with your other point that the end result is positive.

I personally think some of this outrage is about brand loyalty as well.
 

Sendou

Member
Okay, but what does this have to do with "being foolish enough to pay" exactly?

Or is this is a continuation of the stupid "don't pre-order" notion.

Well I find it foolish to willingly take risks associated with funding a game without the real benefits (profit). For now we're getting games we might have never gotten otherwise funded by a Kickstarter projects but how long until even bigger publishers like Sony start putting games there that they would have funded themselves if Kickstarter wasn't an option? Again people are happy when they think they know what they're getting by putting down the money but in fact they have no idea. So in that sense you could consider it even more foolish than pre-ordering.
 

DiscoJer

Member
It's kind of funny, the Ouya did the same thing, albeit with indie games. They'd double the take in a Kickstarter in exchange for like a 6 month exclusive.

And I think were just plain funded completely, like that Jumpman game
 
Considering how well PT was received, Silent Hills seems like an obvious choice. I'm guessing Kojima would be all for it if sony approached him.

My dream? Panzer Dragoon Saga Remake or sequel.
 

Theonik

Member
As for the 'proper' use of Kickstarter, I have this to say: there isn't one. Kickstarter is a service, a way of getting projects off the ground. Game developers may have entered Kickstarter through the desire to free themselves from the shackles of big publishers and make the games they really want to make but nowadays it seems to also be used as a way of attracting more funds in order to finance more ambitious projects.It may be antithetical to the original point of Kickstarter in theory but I think it is a logical evolution. It may (and probably will) turn ugly at some point, almost every new trend in gaming ends up getting exploited and milked. I just hope we'll get some good games before the inevitable ugly end.
It has given us Shenmue III so the industry can crash and burn after that for all I care.
 
Top Bottom