• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Belgian woman, 24, granted right to die by euthanasia over suicidal thoughts

Status
Not open for further replies.

neojubei

Will drop pants for Sony.
A 24-year-old Belgian woman who suffers from depression and has had a "death wish" since childhood has been granted the right to die — even though she's not terminally ill.

Doctors gave the young woman, identified only as Laura, the go-ahead to be euthanized by lethal injection after she spent her life battling suicidal thoughts, she told Belgian newspaper De Morgen.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...euthanasia-death-depression-article-1.2276577

The young Turks had a good debate on this issue

http://youtu.be/ILg838K9CfY
 

Busty

Banned
Why bother to try and cure when we can just drop kick her off this mortal coil and carry on being all progressive and shit.

Good job Belgium, you dicks.






..., aahhhh this story is upsetting to me heart and my head.
 

hiex_

Banned
Speaking as someone with depression who has had heavily suicidal thoughts, I don't like the precedent that sets. Everyone can get better, and we should be striving towards helping. Not letting her off herself.
 

Des0lar

will learn eventually
Any other source?

This kinda feels lacking. I guess they tried all the usual and unusual antidepressants etc and nothing worked? I guess death then can be better than a life full of suffering.
 

THRILLH0

Banned
Fuck this noise.

Mental health is a bitch but this isn't a terminal disease we're talking about. I refuse to believe this poor girl can't be helped.
 

Macka

Member
If she has been that way since childhood...I can somewhat understand. I'm not sure I believe absolutely everybody can recover from depression like that, or at the very least that she would ever have the will to.
 
I've been a supporter of assisted dying when I saw family members of mine suffering from terminal illness.

I don't support assisted dying for anything that isn't terminal, at least not right now.
 

Miles X

Member
Speaking as someone with depression who has had heavily suicidal thoughts, I don't like the precedent that sets. Everyone can get better, and we should be striving towards helping. Not letting her off herself.

Nah. You might have been able to, but the fact she's had these thoughts all her life.

At the end of the day everybody should have the right to die, for whatever reason however stupid it is.
 

sakipon

Member
I kinda feel this there's some info missing. Is depression truly the only or most serious diagnosis she has? Perhaps there is more to her mental illness than that?

If she gets a legal injenction for only depression, then I unfortunately have to change my opinion on legal euthanasia. I'd rather have terminally ill suffering than the state killing anyone who ever wishes it.

Nah. You might have been able to, but the fact she's had these thoughts all her life.

At the end of the day everybody should have the right to die, for whatever reason however stupid it is.

I don't agree. The risk of abuse becomes high if anyone can have a legal suicide for any reason. People who have a bad time in their life might get bullied or pressed to choose assisted suicide. Suicides should never be the norm and a-okay.
 

hiex_

Banned
Nah. You might have been able to, but the fact she's had these thoughts all her life.

At the end of the day everybody should have the right to die, for whatever reason however stupid it is.

Well, I haven't gotten better, and have been dealing with it my whole life. My point is, it's giving up. Assisted suicide in terminal cases is an acceptable thing, to ease someone's passing. She has a mental illness, and letting someone give in to the urges of a sick mind is definitely not the way to go. It's pretty absurd to even compare the two.

People against this should mind their own business.

This is also absurd. State assisted suicide is something we shouldn't discuss?
 

THRILLH0

Banned
People against this should mind their own business.

Yeah let's kill a woman who's brain has barely stopped developing and could have 60 great years ahead of her because we can't be fucked figuring out how to help her.

Whilst I completely understand the pain and anguish mental illness can cause, this isn't a valid answer for a 24 year old.

If you have an argument to make, make it. But telling people to "mind their own business" when talking about a human life is straight up bullshit.
 

Nodnol

Member
As someone with three unsuccessful attempts, and years of depression, and yet managed to make it through the other side, I find it hard to agree with this. No matter how hard it was, no matter how lucky I may or may not be, it was worth it to be here.

It's her life, but as mentioned above, it's a worrying precedent. Finding peace is one thing; giving up is another.
 
I fully support euthanasia for people who are suffering from a disease that has no realistic hope of improving. I think mental issues follow the same principles as any other disease. If doctors concluded that there was no hope for improvement, and that she was suffering, I guess I'm ok with this decision.
Obviously I don't think that people with suicidal thoughts should all be "euthanized" at their requests.
 

Mumei

Member
As someone with three unsuccessful attempts, and years of depression, and yet managed to make it through the other side, I find it hard to agree with this. No matter how hard it was, no matter how lucky I may or may not be, it was worth it to be here.

It's her life, but as mentioned above, it's a worrying precedent. Finding peace is one thing; giving up is another.

Just once was enough for me, but I have the same misgivings. I would like to know more about why they said yes in this particular case, and in what cases they would say no, and what their basis for refusal would be in those cases.
 

antipod

Member
I rather see someone like this euthanised, where she can take proper farewell and having professionals take care of her body, than having a relative walk in on her with slit wrists or some train driver run her over.

Though, granting it to depressed shouldn't be given easily. But, in the end, it's her life.
 

soepje

Member
I'm not sure what to think about this. She's so young, so much could still change given some time. If she was a healthy 95 year old who just felt like they are done after surviving all family and friends i'd probably understand it. But life has so many ups and downs.. How would this be done even? Who would have to give her this injection?
 
I consider myself in favor of right-to-die legislation, in cases of terminal illness and non-curable suffering. I don't know how I feel about this particular case though. I'm thinking there should maybe be a mandatory therapy period in which the individual is given the care to try and cope with their depression before the ultimate decision of death is granted.
 

Miles X

Member
I kinda feel this there's some info missing. Is depression truly the only or most serious diagnosis she has? Perhaps there is more to her mental illness than that?

If she gets a legal injenction for only depression, then I unfortunately have to change my opinion on legal euthanasia. I'd rather have terminally ill suffering than the state killing anyone who ever wishes it.



I don't agree. The risk of abuse becomes high if anyone can have a legal suicide for any reason. People who have a bad time in their life might get bullied or pressed to choose assisted suicide. Suicides should never be the norm and a-okay.

Risk of abuse? If someone wants to genuinely kill themselves they'll jump off a bridge, if they go to a doctor asking to be euthansied because they feel a little depressed, obviously they're not going to give them that unless it's very special circumstances (like this girl here, which I agree in part she should have tried some other methods first, 24 is so young).

But in general, if people want to die it's a right they should have.
 

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
People against this should mind their own business.

Just leave if this is all you can bring to the thread. Euthanasia is a major issue that ought to be discussed, especially over depression, the mental illness that makes people kill themselves.
 

Uncle

Member
I assume the doctors have come to the conclusion that she can't be helped in any other way after a very long process. Or at least I hope that's how it works.
 

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
Risk of abuse? If someone wants to genuinely kill themselves they'll jump off a bridge, if they go to a doctor asking to be euthansied because they feel a little depressed, obviously they're not going to give them that unless it's very special circumstances (like this girl here, which I agree in part she should have tried some other methods first, 24 is so young).

But in general, if people want to die it's a right they should have.

And plenty of people have attempted suicide and gotten better and were thankful they didnt succeed. It sounds like she hasnt even attempted, which is weird.
 

Monocle

Member
Seems like this could potentially cheapen euthanasia and provoke controversy, maybe even obstruction. I hope other cases, involving terminally ill patients, won't be derailed by this.
 

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
Seems like this could potentially cheapen euthanasia and provoke controversy. I hope other cases, involving terminally ill patients, won't be derailed by this.

That would require nuance and complex discussion, which wont happen.
 

IISANDERII

Member
Any other source?

This kinda feels lacking. I guess they tried all the usual and unusual antidepressants etc and nothing worked? I guess death then can be better than a life full of suffering.
Yeah I'm gonna assume they tried everything but everything short of shock therapy and stuff like that. 24yrs of suffering is enough but i wonder why she wasn't able to take her own life.
 

SmokyDave

Member
I'd be inclined to refuse that request I think. I can't move past the whole 'if you really wanted to kill yourself, you would have done so on your own' angle.
 

HK-47

Oh, bitch bitch bitch.
Yeah I'm gonna assume they tried everything but everything short of shock therapy and stuff like that. 24yrs of suffering is enough but i wonder why she wasn't able to take her own life.

If she didnt tried ECT before attempting this, those doctors werent thorough enough. ECT isnt that extreme a treatment.
 

Polari

Member
This is just a permanent solution to a temporary problem

I don't agree with that. It's a problem I've had since about the age of 11. You go through good patches sure, but it will always be there.

That said, this sets a terrible precedent.
 

Vitten

Member
Whatever, it's her choice.

Better this then her jumping in front of a train and traumatising yet another train driver. ( which seems to be the main suicide MO here in Belgium )
 

TasTokyo

Member
And plenty of people have attempted suicide and gotten better and were thankful they didnt succeed. It sounds like she hasnt even attempted, which is weird.

"I played all my life with these thoughts of suicide, I have also done a few attempts,"

From the very short linked article.

It also states she entered a psychiatric institution at 21. Not sure if she left it later or is still there form the article. It sounds like treatment has been attempted.
 

THRILLH0

Banned
I can't tell if the "it's her choice" crowd are serious. She has a severe mental illness. She isn't choosing anything of sound mind.
 
D

Deleted member 13876

Unconfirmed Member
Whatever, it's her choice.

Better this then her jumping in front of a train and traumatising yet another train driver. ( which seems to be the main suicide MO here in Belgium )

Not just the train driver in some cases. My brother saw a jumper on a platform full of people including small children and was really messed up by it this year.
 
If she is an adult and really wants to die I can't see an issue.

Even though I said I was in favour of this, I can't really agree with the above statement. We usually allow adults that are of sound mind to make their own decisions - the problem is that with depression there's kind of a catch-22, if someone wants to die we assume that they are not sane. If someone is depressed and wants to die, the doctor's first reaction is not "ok, sure, let's do it". A lot of people get better with treatment.

So I just assumed that after a long battle with depression, after a thought out process, a group of doctors actually realized that in this particular case there was no hope for improvement, and that the person manifested a strong, continuous, persistent desire to die.
 

E-phonk

Banned
Read an interview with her in dutch a few weeks ago.

Basically she isn't "suicidal" and depressed in the normal sense, but since she was a child she has been living with a "internal pain" that is psychologically based.
She's quite intelligent and seems to have a clear mind about it. She's tired of fighting and says she has nothing to live for - knowing her life will end (the complete procedure for euthanasia lasted about 1.5 year) gave her more strength and made her and the people around her cope with it in a humane way (what suicide never does).

I'm not going to debate it here, but it sounded like a well thought out plan, and not something done just "because she's depressed/suicidal".

The interview I read with her:
http://www.demorgen.be/nieuws/laura...ond-ze-krijgt-deze-zomer-euthanasie-a2367037/

And a quote by hawking:
“To keep someone alive against their wishes is the ultimate indignity"
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Reasonable... as long as sufficient duty of care was done to assess her case and see if she had prospects of 'recovery' from depression.

I mean... we might not currently recognize it as terminal... but what if there's simply no hope for recovery with her? No will nor desire?

Surely such edge cases should merit the full gamut of solutions, less society itself become worse off by closing off the debate without consideration or discussion for the deeper intricacies of each specific case.
 

Red

Member
She might have sought this out as validation for her thoughts. I agree mental health must be nourished and cared for, but I don't always agree with the way "support" is framed. When you say, "there must have been another way," "I'm sure someone could have helped her," "you just needed to try another option" and so on, you are tacitly naming the decision and action of suicide a failure. As if the woman has failed, her caretakers have failed, her family has failed. I don't believe that is the case. If she is living a life of misery because of her mental health, and it cannot be remedied in a way that satisfies her, then she should be allowed the right of euthanasia. If you support euthanasia for any other terminal illness, and you recognize that mental illness is a real condition and can induce suffering comparable to physical illness, I don't see how you could conclude otherwise. Seems hypocritical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom