• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

George Lucas quips he sold 'Star Wars' to "white slavers," criticizes tone of TFA

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the meantime, he still made AT LEAST 2 if not 3 objectively important films. Can he just answer a question without people getting bizzarrely defensive?
.

He only actually made 1 of those. He didn't write or direct ESB and co-wrote Jedi with the guy who wrote ESB and he didn't direct that one either.
 
Lol, George, why go there.

Prequels were indeed creative. But they were also decidedly average to poor in overall quality. It took the release of a cartoon series for that creativity to shine anyway.

This post should be the gaf banner. Complaints about TFA then praising Mad Max.

Mad Max is the real deal though. Don't let the folks who are basically jumping on the 'cool to malign something popular' bandwagon spoil what is easily the best (and most surprisingly best) movie of 2015.

And moreover, don't let the current volume of those guys fool you: TFA is a massive success in virtually every way imaginable.
 
Dies Iræ;190844615 said:
This is a fair question.

It boils down to this: The Phantom Menace feels like a genuine attempt to expand the creative limits of the Star Wars universe, whereas The Force Awakens feels like a cynical attempt to retread on its creative past.

Then it comes down to what you value: originality or a good time. No one would argue that TFA wasn't a good time - but it was a good time that depended ultimately on nostalgia and creative work from the original series. In the absence of Lucas' work in the original trilogy - and contributions by others, including Kasdan - TFA wouldn't have been possible.

In that light, I think Lucas deserves credit even for the success of TFA.
TFA adds little and borrows/retreads a lot. I

Had Lucas been hands off with the PT (aside from the broad story strokes) maybe they could have worked. But for what we have, they didn't. The characters, dialogue, chemistry etc, just wasn't there. I still think anakin as a child was a wasted movie (start him as a teen, give him 3 movies with obi wan to grow their relationship etc).

So for right now I am fine with an enjoyable rehash, we will see what episodes 8 and 9 do. I think 8 is the make or break movie (much like ESB was for the OT, and how clones was arguably the worst PT movie).
 

Gnome

Member
Somehow some of you have found a way to blame the shortcomings of The Force Awakens on the prequel trilogy on here. You people are incredible.
 

ultracal31

You don't get to bring friends.
I'm curious what a person who saw TFA as their first Star Wars movie thinks of the original trilogy.

2nd time I watched TFA with a person who has never seen OT or PT. Her takeaway after watching the movie were she had a good time with the movie, liked the characters and felt the movie provides enough info to her to explain the OT characters.

Edit: I misunderstood your comment, my bad
 

ampere

Member
I am trying to imagine how total shit they'd be if George wrote them

George in the 70s could have done em, but George now? lol
 

zsynqx

Member
What's that got to do with not having to retrace the steps of the original to appease the fans? the fans just wanted some good movies to watch. Its like Disney got a bunch of letters from the weirdo fans asking them, "could you remind me of my childhood since Lucas decided to take it from me?" and they obliged.

Nothing, I am just saying that it would have been pointless to "remake" 89 batman. :p
 
Explosive language aside, my first thought upon seeing it was "been there and done that". I really didn't have much hype for the movie and it didn't really live up to the hype other people around me were feeling.

Yeah sure it's a fun story and it's Star Wars so it is cooler than a lot of stuff, but it still felt samey to me. I can totally see how he would say something like that.

my thoughts exactly. although it being Star Wars is still a big enough draw.
 

Lynx_7

Member
TFA told an entertaining story inspired by a previous entry while setting up its own stuff to be expanded upon in the sequels. To me that's already a much better objective than whatever "original" ideas the prequels were going for. It's a better movie and that's what's important in the end.

That said I have my qualms with Lucas like thinking it's really dumb how he doesn't even give people the option to purchase the theatrical cuts of the OT for example (though that's Disney's responsibility now and right now they're not doing a much better job as far as that's concerned), but I also believe he gets way too much shit from SW fans. While I feel disappointed with a lot of his decisions I also feel sorry for the guy.
 

aliengmr

Member
To me the prequels were bad (all three), and this movie is better in the sense that it was more entertaining, but saying the prequels tried to do more stuff with franchise than this movie did isn't wrong and I don't see that as a sign of praise for the prequels it's just a fact.

Anakin building C3PO? Really?

BOBA FETT.

What did the prequels do other than provide a back story for an already existing character? TFA introduced an entire cast of new main characters, and you are claiming that a poorly conceived trilogy featuring already established characters is more creative? So what is this fanciful, inspired direction the prequels took? Trade minutia?

If anything was "safe" it was the PT, Clone Wars + Darth Vader, how could you fuck that up?
 

ExVicis

Member
Why does he have to be so bitter? The Force Awakens isn't nearly as good as A New Hope. He can hang his hat on that...

I bet it's the money.

Yeah, probably the money.

I don't think it's the money. I think it's that the movie is successful without him. Sure it's not ESB but it's still a decent 8/10 at movie and I think that upsets him. He probably liked to think his involvement and participation gave the movies something that people at least liked and he's discovering that wasn't the case at all.
 

Lord Panda

The Sea is Always Right
Why did Lucas sell it at all? Didn't think he needed the money.

He should have stipulated a Disney board position as part of the sale.
 

Oddish1

Member
Watching the video I don't really get the impression that he's bitter or "salty" about TFA, just sad that a franchise he made has been taken over by someone else. Which I think is understandable.
 
Everyone was nuts over Episode 1's Duel of the Fates then 2's Yoda duel, then it was hated when the next came out. It's kind of cyclical.

(Mind you, I like the prequel trilogy.)

People then found things to nitpick over. With 1 it was the midichlorians. Then with 2, the love story, Then with 3, the 'ridiculous' lightsaber fights. Internet and Plinkett, mostly.

Ep II was trounced immediately upon release by pretty much everyone
 

DopeToast

Banned
I love George and what he went through to make Star Wars and the rest of the original trilogy, but it's time to move on. Somewhere along the line he lost it, and it's time to move on.
 

Aylinato

Member
Dies Iræ;190843580 said:
TFA was a total nostalgia cash-in, no different than Abrams' Star Trek films. George Lucas' prequels were a disaster in many respects, but The Phantom Menace has ten times as many original ideas as TFA. For that alone, it deserves immense praise.


Lololololololol no no it doesn't deserve any praise
 
Time will tell if the new trilogy is just a retread, or something wildly different. IMO the first movie is setting up the universe. It's a retread because it's pulling you in to want to watch the sequels. If they go wild in the 2nd movie, then it's all good.
 

rex

Member
No, they were all cheesy. Dialogue has never been the series strong point. The only thing the OT had going for it was that it had 70s/80s Harrison Ford, who could make anything sound good.

Harrison has nothing on Carrie in ANH.

Into the garbage chute flyboy! > Boring Conversation Anyway!

Obi-wan, er, you, know this to be true.
 

Fj0823

Member
I love George and what he went through to make Star Wars and the rest of the original trilogy, but it's time to move on. Somewhere along the line he lost it, and it's time to move on.

That's exactly what he says in the video can be summarized to "Meh, didnt like this one's tone very much, I'd would've used new designs, but whatever"
 

Prologue

Member
Don't know how he can say that, considering how well received the movie was critically and by the audience, especially when compared to his prequels. Theres denial and theres well....this.
 
Ep II was trounced immediately upon release by pretty much everyone

Right. Also, it seems weird to singles scenes in each movie as being loved and then go on to assert that the only reason they're not loved anymore is because of the Plinkett reviews. "Everyone loved Duel of the Fates before Plinkett!" Yeah, well, even if that's true, that's one five minute scene in a 135 minute movie. The same is true of the Dooku fight in Clones. "There were parts that people really liked" isn't in and of itself great praise for the films.
 

Davey Cakes

Member
That's classic Hollywood thinking these days, whether it's a sequel, remake or a straight ripoff. Make the same shit, but bigger, louder and CRAZIER. So of course we got a new Death Star. A Death Star that is 50 times bigger than the old one. A Death Star that travels and shoots its planet-destroying laser at lightspeed. A Death Star that consumes entire stars to power itself up. A Death Star that doesn't destroy just one planet in the movie, but an entire planetary system. Bigger. Louder. Crazier.

Of course, when it comes to destroying the thing, it's an even easier job than before LOL.

Death Star Mark III along with I-Rex in Jurassic World is some of the laziest shit I've seen in blockbusters lately.
I loved the movie but THIS was easily one of the worst things about it. And Snoke. Oh god...Snoke. *facepalm*

Thankfully those blunders didn't destroy the rest of the experience. Took it down at least a letter grade though.

As much as I don't care for the prequel trilogy, those movies had their moments. And as much as TFA was over-reliant on ANH and the OT in general, it was still a well done sci-fi/fantasy epic with fun action and good characters.

Honestly, it's a bit mind-numbing reading all of these hyperbolic statements about Star Wars movies, of all things.
 

Nairume

Banned
Right. Also, it seems weird to singles scenes in each movie as being loved and then go on to assert that the only reason they're not loved anymore is because of the Plinkett reviews. "Everyone loved Duel of the Fates before Plinkett!" Yeah, well, even if that's true, that's one five minute scene in a 195 minute movie. The same is true of the Dooku fight in Clones. "There were parts that people really liked" isn't in and of itself great praise for the films.
There's also a point to be made that, even if you factor in reviews that came in for the 3D rerelease, Phantom Menace wasn't very well reviewed as a film and popular culture was already dogging on it pretty immediately.

I mean, fuck, there was a simpsons episode based around TPM being a disappointment that came out in the middle of the prequels' run. It's not like people not liking the prequels was some phenomenon that happened after the fact and everybody absolutely loved them before then.
 

Fj0823

Member
I loved the movie but THIS was easily one of the worst things about it. And Snoke. Oh god...Snoke. *facepalm*

Thankfully those blunders didn't destroy the rest of the experience. Took it down at least a letter grade though.

As much as I don't care for the prequel trilogy, those movies has their moments. And as much as TFA was over-reliant on ANH and the OT in general, it was still a well done sci-fi/fantasy epic with fun action and good characters.

Honestly, it's a bit mind-numbing reading all of these hyperbolic statements about Star Wars movies, of all things.

Are you implying we should have...fff...FUN with these movies!?

2NSErNg.gif
 

nelchaar

Member
And that tells you all you need to know about why Lucas isn't involved. His idea of making a big difference is new planets and spaceships. Also, reusing the Death Star in Jedi says hello.

Are you insinuating Ep VII is different...?
they had a third Death Star. A THIRD. It was pretty much Ep IV remake.
 

aliengmr

Member
Me too. I wish it didn't copy so much from ANH. I get a feeling episode 8 might suck because they can't copy again, they will have to be more original.

I know of no one that wants an ESB retread. 8 is going to be original, JJ was pretty quick to point that out.
 

Davey Cakes

Member
Are you implying we should have...fff...FUN with these movies!?
There's a reason I absolutely HAD to see TFA during opening weekend, and it was to avoid all the bullshit and just try to have a good time while not letting my excitement cloud my mind and not letting reviews and Internet opinions and spoilers detract from a fresh, fun moviegoing experience.

It WAS a good time and I'm going back on Friday.
 

Error

Jealous of the Glory that is Johnny Depp
The fact that again there's a shady guy behind scenes that has a disfigured face is hilarious, we've seen that concept in EVERY single Star Wars movie now.

Also I agree with jett, the whole idea behind the new Death Star is absolutely ridiculous. Easily the worst part of the film.

I'm hoping Snoke dies early in episode VIII and Knights of Ren are established as the main threat moving forward, I want something like the Judges in Final Fantasy XII. Snoke is just an overused and tired cliche that this franchise needs to drop like a hot rock.
 

Fj0823

Member
The fact that again there's a shady guy behind scenes that has a disfigured face is hilarious, we've seen that concept in EVERY single Star Wars movie now.

Also I agree with jett, the whole idea behind the new Death Star is absolutely ridiculous. Easily the worst part of the film.

I'm hoping Snoke dies early in episode VIII and Knights of Ren are established as the main threat moving forward, I want something like the Judges in Final Fantasy XII. Snoke is just an overused and tired cliche that this franchise needs to drop like a hot rock.

Snoke has to die to Kylo's hand, and he has to take his place. All part of the Knight's plan to dispose of a silly old sith and take control of the outer side of the galaxy. And that's just step one.

PLEASE, PLEASE DO IT!
 
He only actually made 1 of those. He didn't write or direct ESB and co-wrote Jedi with the guy who wrote ESB and he didn't direct that one either.

He wrote 3 drafts of ESB. The big twist was his idea. He just chose not to credit himself with them. He also had has hands all over production. It was his baby the same way all the Star Wars movies and Indiana Jones movies were. Lets not act like it wasn't because his name technically appears in the credits lol.
 

ExVicis

Member
The fact that again there's a shady guy behind scenes that has a disfigured face is hilarious, we've seen that concept in EVERY single Star Wars movie now.

Also I agree with jett, the whole idea behind the new Death Star is absolutely ridiculous. Easily the worst part of the film.

I'm hoping Snoke dies early in episode VIII and Knights of Ren are established as the main threat moving forward, I want something like the Judges in Final Fantasy XII. Snoke is just an overused and tired cliche that this franchise needs to drop like a hot rock.

Honestly I was hoping somehow that Death Star was somehow gonna be a different take on that kinda Superweapon. Really disappointed how it was literally the same role as the previous ones.

As for the Knights of Ren over Snoke...we barely even know anything about the Knights and Snoke. As dumb as I think Snoke is, I think an order of just some Vader fanboys in a some masks is not a good series of antagonists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom