• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Of Gods and Men [Mafia] | Ambrosia In Front Of Me

Swamped

Banned
To those of you saying that LP was not an obvious vig target, I disagree. I can see where Gorlak is coming from. LP had the most votes after FEP and Darryl, so targeting him makes perfect sense to me.
 

Sophia

Member
Because I'm not at my computer? I really can't write a huge post from my phone.

Then please say this. As much spectator chat might disagree, we're not on a daytime soap opera. After that weirdness that Seath and Gorlak did earlier, we need as much open communication as possible.
 

Swamped

Banned
I have a lot to say, but will only have time to type everything up at lunch...

Sophia, it's literally the first line in my post XD

I also previously said that I will be overwhelmed this weekend, so the game is taking a backseat. Just find my old posts.
 

Sophia

Member
Sophia, it's literally the first line in my post XD

I also previously said that I will be overwhelmed this weekend, so the game is taking a backseat. Just find my old posts.

My apologizes. I'm a bit on edge here unrelated to the game. We're waiting to here from Zipped too, so you've got time.
 
I don't think Zipped is scum, I just don't understand Freak as a target. It's also had no discussion today for some reason, despite the Crimson target being much more obvious

Who knows? Maybe they're looking for Komena? Or maybe absorbs/targets is a town action? Or maybe just for the lols. Chances are isn't much else Zipped could find yesterday unless a) mafia didn't use all of their roles and b) he got extremely lucky.

Combine the quotes. I think the spells are a waste of time and nothing but a distraction. The gorlak business has been going for three days now, on and on. I want the commands handled as soon as possible instead of them popping up til the end of time.

The dream, the fluff that is, could be used to confirm things, though it stinks of disgusting metagaming. I don't feel the same about the phrases, maybe the dreamers could comment if they could be made up easily.

Not at all, the word I received seems to be made up.
Oh, nope, there was a day 2 vote for Zipped as well

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=200123552#post200123552

Hmm...

Yeah, I kept my vote on Crimson day 1 just like you did until StarSketch did what she did. I switched on to Zipped and provided my reasons.
 

Sophia

Member
Yeah, I kept my vote on Crimson day 1 just like you did until StarSketch did what she did. I switched on to Zipped and provided my reasons.

Yeah, your votes for Crimson day 1 and Zipped day 2 make sense to me. Only the Day 2 vote for Crimson feels slightly unusual right now. Meh.
 
Theory - Splinter is scum and is or has access to person who owns targets ability?

I won't vig-shot anyone tonight. So I can't confirm myself tomorrow, sorry. I fear "targets" may be a redirecting ability scum can use.
So I'm not falling for this one, scum.
As far as I was concerned I figured Gorlak wouldn't use his power. It's been one of my main issues against him.

But Splinter thought otherwise
Not only did he figure Gorlak would use a power, but knew it would be the vig shot and figured it would be on him.
Gorlak what convinced you to target LP? To be honest I thought you would kill me last night

===========
I vig shot LP
it must have been redirected

my bluff didn't work
Splinter wasn't fooled by the bluff.

Splinter was also the first(only?) one to call out CF as a PR
Well, ok, you are suggesting you have some extra info - most likely related to a PR - to suggest Gorlak is scum. This justifies your first post somewhat, although I don't understand why you felt the need to do this. It looks like Gorlak was well on his way to being lynched without you hinting at a power.

While he really thinks Darryl is scum, he votes LP anyway and now today he has a post or 2 calling out scum in the FEP/Darryl votes. There is a chance a scum or 2 dodged both votes that day. Goes to bat hard defending Gorlak.

================
Looking at CF's last post it was actually:
Final post of the day then: That L_P train picked up steam pretty quickly, and if Darryl dose end up flipping scum, it's not the best look for people on it. He's an easy target and has been pretty inactive, and I can't really say I disagree with it, especially since I was happy voting him out yesterday, but at the same time, he could end up flipping either way. I'd be really interested to know why Seath hasn't gotten any negative attention for his one terrible vote too, people really jumped on Star for doing something very similar yesterday.

He was weary of the LP voters and also wanted to know why no one addressed Seath. Which it (Seath)seems Splinter doesn't care too much for.
===========
Zipped could find yesterday unless a) mafia didn't use all of their roles
Actually that could be possible. Especially if the scum who carries out the kill can't perform their role power that night.
 
Thinking there's a scum redirect isn't rocket science. Zipped saw a "targets" power. Gorlak was the first to suggest his kill was redirected. I'm simply going off what's been suggested in the thread. I have no extra information or knowledge.

The last two votes on me look suspicious (Kyan and Swamped). We have 27 hours to go. 4/7 is turbo range. Something you don't want me to say?
 

Sophia

Member
Thinking there's a scum redirect isn't rocket science. Zipped saw a "targets" power. Gorlak was the first to suggest his kill was redirected. I'm simply going off what's been suggested in the thread. I have no extra information or knowledge.

The last two votes on me look suspicious (Kyan and Swamped). We have 27 hours to go. 4/7 is turbo range. Something you don't want me to say?

Does that mean you have something to say...?
 
Gorlak was the first to suggest his kill was redirected. I'm simply going off what's been suggested in the thread. I have no extra information or knowledge.

Yea Gorlack was the first to say it was redirected. You were the first to assign CF's kill to Vig/Neutral though.
=======
I'm a bit surprised Crimson died. He was definitely on a couple people's scum list which could've led scum to avoid them. I bet it was a neutral or vig kill.

Gorlak was an easy redirect target. Scum must've figured you would roleblock or shoot Crimson.

I want to point out that you made the first post at the same time that Gorlak made the post claiming he targeted you, so you couldn't have known CF was teh vig/neu kill.

In the 2nd one you have no doubt it was CF who was killed becuase of Vig. Why do you assign the Freak kill to mafia automatically at the start of the day?
 

*Splinter

Member
As far as I was concerned I figured Gorlak wouldn't use his power. It's been one of my main issues against him.
Seriously? You couldn't resist unnecessary turbos in every day of your last game, but you think Gorlak would resist using a vig kill? Bullshit. I was surprised he hadn't used it night one.
 

*Splinter

Member
Thinking there's a scum redirect isn't rocket science. Zipped saw a "targets" power. Gorlak was the first to suggest his kill was redirected. I'm simply going off what's been suggested in the thread. I have no extra information or knowledge.

The last two votes on me look suspicious (Kyan and Swamped). We have 27 hours to go. 4/7 is turbo range. Something you don't want me to say?
4/7 is not turbo range...
 
Seriously? You couldn't resist unnecessary turbos in every day of your last game, but you think Gorlak would resist using a vig kill? Bullshit. I was surprised he hadn't used it night one.
What does how I play in another game have to do with how a totally different player plays in this game? Especially when the power isn't the same. Also I hit scum 3/4 times in that game didn't I?

In that same game u mention about me, a new player didnt use his vig shot N1.
 

*Splinter

Member
What does how I play in another game have to do with how a totally different player plays in this game? Especially when the power isn't the same. Also I hit scum 3/4 times in that game didn't I?

In that same game u mention about me, a new player didnt use his vig shot N1.
Why is it hard to believe he would use a vig shot? Just because it's risky?
 
Why is it hard to believe he would use a vig shot? Just because it's risky?

Maybe because he said he wouldn't use it? Why wouldn't I believe a person who is town saying he wouldnt use his power in fear of costing town the game. Why would I have a reason not to believe him?

Also I ONLY had my vote power, he had supposedly another option in a roleblock.

While you are trying to bring up my actions and power in another game to defend Gorlak or w/e reason you knew he would use his Vig shot instead of roleblock. Don't forget to bring up my actions on my last 2 days. I stated I wouldn't use my vote steal, because I didn't want to harm town's chances of winning.

Guess what?

I didn't use my vote steal because I didn't want to harm town's chances of winning.
 
Mafia is speculation. Nothing is confirmed until a flip happens. I shouldn't have to preface every post with "I think".
Forum game and you are speaking like you know something. Can't blame ppl for thinking that way if you dont put "i think" or something like that in a post.


Also I thnk you missed this post from Sophia?
Does that mean you have something to say...?

This may be the first time you brought up swamped and kyan this day phase, what exactly would they be afraid of you saying?
 

Sophia

Member
Just fyi, I really don't care too much for these meta arguments regarding another game that I haven't read. It particularly doesn't look good on Splinter, seeing as he brought them up.
 

*Splinter

Member
It particularly doesn't look good on Splinter
You say this in every post. I don't give a shit if I look good or not, I'm trying to find scum. I wasn't even interested in defending Gorlak there I was trying to work out why Zeke would find his actions so unbelievable. Does Zeke really think that's a lynch worthy argument or is he saying stupid shit on purpose? I can't tell.
 

Sophia

Member
You say this in every post. I don't give a shit if I look good or not, I'm trying to find scum. I wasn't even interested in defending Gorlak there I was trying to work out why Zeke would find his actions so unbelievable. Does Zeke really think that's a lynch worthy argument or is he saying stupid shit on purpose? I can't tell.

Maybe if you're trying to hunt scum, might it be best to resort to actual arguments then? All I can do is roll my eyes when your argument starts out with "You couldn't resist unnecessary turbos in every day of your last game". It doesn't tell me anything, and it makes me think you don't have an actual argument sometimes. I didn't like it when Zipped did it in Day 1, and I'm certainly not going to tolerate it from you in Day 3.

I don't think it's unreasonable to look upon Gorlak with suspicion for using his vig shot now. He claimed outright he wouldn't use it at the end of Day 2 for precisely assuming it was a redirect ability:

I won't vig-shot anyone tonight. So I can't confirm myself tomorrow, sorry. I fear "targets" may be a redirecting ability scum can use. It is the only one that has an "s" attached to it and school taught me that verbs in this form are used in sentences like this:

Come Day 3, we find out he apparently used it, and he immediately claimed it was a redirect ability. If he's telling the truth, that's an incredibly silly town play. Definitely worthy of quite a bit of scrutiny, even if I don't know about him leaving his vote on Gorlak.
 
Also I thnk you missed this post from Sophia?


This may be the first time you brought up swamped and kyan this day phase, what exactly would they be afraid of you saying?

Ask them. Plenty of time left and they act like if they don't vote for me now it'll be too late.
 

Kevyt

Member
You say this in every post. I don't give a shit if I look good or not, I'm trying to find scum. I wasn't even interested in defending Gorlak there I was trying to work out why Zeke would find his actions so unbelievable. Does Zeke really think that's a lynch worthy argument or is he saying stupid shit on purpose? I can't tell.

Yawn...
 
I wasn't even interested in defending Gorlak there I was trying to work out why Zeke would find his actions so unbelievable. Does Zeke really think that's a lynch worthy argument or is he saying stupid shit on purpose? I can't tell.
Where have I said they were unbelievable? I questioned why he would vig shot over rb and why he would lie about using his power. You are the one bringing up stupid shit by bringing up a stupid shitty comparison to another game.


Ask them. Plenty of time left and they act like if they don't vote for me now it'll be too late.
Ok, seems like you think they know something about you. Since you think they don't want you to say anything. But nvm.
 

*Splinter

Member
It's not a comparison. You say Gorlak "shouldnt" have killed someone because it's risky and potentially anti town. You claim that's unusual despite exhibiting similar behaviour yourself in the past.

I loathe having to spell this out, but my point isn't "here's an example of a similar play" (because it's not). My point is that it doesn't make sense for YOU PERSONALLY to find this so hard to understand because you have first hand experience of doing something not necessarily in towns best interest.
 
It's not a comparison. You say Gorlak "shouldnt" have killed someone because it's risky and potentially anti town. You claim that's unusual despite exhibiting similar behavior yourself in the past.
I say Gorlak shouldn't have done it because he said he WASNT GONNA DO IT.

I loathe having to spell this out, but my point isn't "here's an example of a similar play" (because it's not). My point is that it doesn't make sense for YOU PERSONALLY to find this so hard to understand because you have first hand experience of doing something not necessarily in towns best interest.
I didn't say I wouldn't use my power and then turned around and used it neway. What's is so hard about it for you to understand? It's not that difficult honestly.

I find it interesting you focus on this now, after I posted you believed Gorlak would kill you. You didn't bring any of this up when me and Gorlak was going at it.

Better question, why didn't you question his vote on you?
 

Sophia

Member
Seath is just trolling with his constant vote changes. I kind of want to policy lynch him.

I'm thinking I want to policy lynch him too; the only reason I've hesitated voting for him is I don't want to cost town the game over it.

It's frustrating. How are we suppose to proceed with a player acting like that and the possibility of them being an un-lynchable God? Especially on Day 3 after four town deaths...
 

Kevyt

Member
Fools, all of you.

This game is boring me, and as an emperor god, I demand blood!.

Mortals fight amongst you and kill one another. It satisfies my hunger for destruction and decay.

Sloth+jesus+read+the+title_03feee_4553010.png


Yes, I'm Peripseros and I'm neutral.

We the gods are neutral and don't really care about either town or scum. Our victory conditions are different from yours. Stand against me and you'll pay dearly.

You guys lost your chances to remove our godhood. Puny mortals.

Now the real game begins.

Entertain me, mortals.

giphy.gif
 

Sophia

Member
Sooo... lets think this out.

Then you guys either believe me or believe Gorlak.

Which one is it?

I will not be happy/satisfied until we lynch Gorlak.

You won't be happy/satisfied until Gorlak is lynched.
Gorlak's commands are Holy Ward and Sacrament, the odd ones out among Zipped's commands.
He didn't reveal either of these on Day 1, thought I was barking up the wrong tree.
Didn't reveal them on Day 2 until Zipped posted the list of commands.
And then there's the command "Martyrize", which usually means "to make a martyr of someone"

I'm bored, so I suggest something:

Lynch me and if I flip town and Gorlak survives the night, you guys lynch him the next day.

Deal?

Let's go:

Vote: Seath

And then there's this vote where you said to lynch you, then lynch Gorlak the next day.

If I had to guess: Gorlak is Komena and your win condition is related to removing him. Which means I was right when you two confirmed each other. Something happens when we lynch him or you, and it's related to your win condition. Presumably, you also haven't fulfilled your win condition as you're still here yet you had more than enough evidence to suggest that Gorlak is the other God.

Now the question I'm wondering is...

Fine!

Peer pressure much.

Vote: Lone Prodigy

Vote: WhereAreMahDragonz

She's still one of my suspects.

I'm not fond of her drive by posts and how much she seems to go with the flow.

Vote: *Splinter

Something's fishy here.

... did you accidentally just town confirm these people? Or are we being played and one of scum is among this group?
 

Swamped

Banned
When I was re-reading Seath I figured he might be a God, but I wasn't sure which one. There was a lot of speculation on D1, plus his erratic votes and that back-and-forth with Gorlak made it seem like he didn't care about how he looked to town, because he can't be lynched. Voting for him will result in a waste of a day.

We the gods are neutral and don't really care about either town or scum. Our victory conditions are different from yours. Stand against me and you'll pay dearly.

So somehow Seath knows that Komena is also a neutral. Does that mean she is not on our side? She must at least be a town-aligned neutral.

Seath - were you the one in charge of choosing the dictates every day phase? Do you really think Gorlak is scum?

Feng too had a dream, that's three persons for three parts of a spell. Still, it would make sense if there was at least one scum among them and your OA vs. Seath idea ain't wrong per se, if you consider feng town.

The only way I can see us using the god-slaying spell is that all dreamers tell their commands and we kill them. If they all flip town, we can use the commands. So I am not seeing how the commands are anything but a distraction at this point, especially if all we need to kill are the followers of Pepsi, and not Pepsi themselves.

This is a very dangerous assumption to make, would they really just alternate like that? I'd rather believe that RNG decided this as opposed to deliberately giving it to mafia and town on alternate nights. Seems like an easy way to lynch two potential town members because you could be like "if one isn't surely the other is!" Investigate, fine. But lynch somebody because they seem scummy.

I misunderstood that the spell is fragmented and then handed to people. I thought that OA had full access to a God-killing spell. I assumed that one God was scum-aligned and the other town aligned, which meant that both sides need a way of killing the gods in order to fulfill their win condition. This is why I assumed that either Seath or OA were a follwer of Pepsi.

Now, Seath was probably lying about receiving a dream. Why would a God need a god-slaying spell? Unless...only the Gods can kill each other (I think someone said this D1)

BUT BUT BUT Feng had a dream too, and he has not yet come forward about it. Feng, please let us know what the dream was about. You are definitely not a god since your power was the 1-shot LR.

There's no harm in speculating about who the gods are right? I think the other God is OA. When re-reading OA I actually at first thought he might be scum, but maybe being a god is an option too.

Still thinking about yesterday, something bothers me about how it went down (not accusing anybody... yet) but Zipped gets told from above to examine Sophia.

1) How did whoever did this know that Zipped had a power? Even if he was aligned with mafia that would mean that the mafia god is in their chat.

2) Why Sophia?

3) Why no request for obedience today?

I think that a god (Peripseros) might have some knowledge of our PRs. Maybe they wanted Zipped to get roleblocked by Sophia but they got lucky with the LR? Still not a fan of the open display of PRs because I still don't know how that helped town in any way but I digress.

Also, just wondering did everybody sleep well last night? Because I had a dream.

Bolding is by me. Before Seath came out and said that the gods were neutrals I thought P was part of the scum team (I guess he could have been a recruitable though...). So I would have thought the first bolded sentence was obvious. Why does OA use the word 'Even' in it? Then he says that P has knowledge of our PRs. I mean, after Zipped released the list on D2, everyone did. Not sure what this implies yet, but I want to keep it in mind.

So yeah, I initially scum-read OA, but now I'm not so sure. OA knows more than he lets on, and whether that's because he's scum or a god I can't tell. OA received a part of a god-killing spell too...

I also can't tell if Seath is telling the truth about being P. Maybe he's actually K. Either way, doesn't affect us mortals much. I believe that Seath is a god though, just from his playstyle throughout the game.

The last two votes on me look suspicious (Kyan and Swamped). We have 27 hours to go. 4/7 is turbo range. Something you don't want me to say?

Don't...don't tell them that I regularly eat tubs of speculoos ice-cream with copious amount of speculoos spread slathered on it D:

You're exaggerating about a turbo. Also, I've been suspicious of you since the start of this day phase, so my vote is timely. Did not want to vote immediately since I was reading OA and Seath. Having votes down is always a good thing in my mind, and they can definitely change - we still have plenty of time in this day phase. You seem nervous.
 
What a garbage argument, are you fucking real?
I'm gonna assume there is a misunderstanding between us and you aren't causing an argument and cheery picking what you answer to distract ppl.

This statement should clear everything up:
My argument/case with Gorlak, why I suspect he is scum and why I was on his case today, really has nothign to do with WHY he shot last night. I posted my reason for going in on him earlier.

Me: I feel I saw a crack in Gorlak when he called me scum in response to questioning whether or not we believe his kill. Has been more defensive and stuff with each post. So eh.

So this argument you are trying to have about how I should understand how and why personally Gorlak used his vig shot is the garbage argument here. Especially since hardly anything is similar between the two games. Not the same powers, not the same situations. The only thing similar is that we both told town we wouldn't use our powers (I was a vote thief btw, so no one wouldve died). I didn't lie so didn't steal a vote. He lied and vig shot anyway.
 

Sophia

Member
That doesn't hold up because Gorlak claims he was targeted last night with a redirect.

Oh, you have a point. If he was targeted by the redirect, then that would make him ineligible....

Seeing as Swamped brought up OA, what do you two think of this exchange from pre-game? It was after OA claims he got his role, but before we knew there were Gods.

Only one player left to check in!

Looking at the S5 review thread I thought about making D1 only 48h. Any objections?

Also, I updated post #3 with the following note:
You may receive PMs during the night phase. Please check your PMs regularly!

Doesn't really matter too much to me. Will the rest of day phases be 4 days?
 

Swamped

Banned
Feng mentioned taht his dream wasn't about killing gods.

Oh yeah I missed that. Hm so maybe only gods got the god-killing dreams (again, assuming I'm right about OA being a god). But it's a three-part dream sounds like, possibly with a part of the spell being revealed each night. Is this going to be a race for which god gets the avada kedavra spell first?!?!?! Because that doesn't sound entirely fair. Seath got his first dream on N1, whereas OA got his N2.

I really don't think Gorlak is a god. He has fought very hard these past few day phases to not be lynched. An unlynchable target would not do that.
 
Oh, you have a point. If he was targeted by the redirect, then that would make him ineligible....

Seeing as Swamped brought up OA, what do you two think of this exchange from pre-game? It was after OA claims he got his role, but before we knew there were Gods.
Idk, just reads to me like he doesn't care about the D1 length.
 

Sophia

Member
Idk, just reads to me like he doesn't care about the D1 length.

Hmm. Alrighty then. I wasn't sure. I noticed it back on Day 1, but pushed it to the back of my mind until now.

At any rate, I've got a really bad feeling telling me that lynching Seath or Gorlak is not a wise idea this day. I guess I could being played with and Gorlak really is scum, tho.
 

Kevyt

Member
We knew about the dreams and the potential for us to lose our godhood.

But alas, you guys wasted that opportunity.

Pitiful, but expected from you puny mortals.

Additionally, I never said that Gorlak was Komena.

Stop putting words on my mouth puny mortals.
 
Top Bottom