• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Magic: the Gathering |OT8| Eldritch Moon - It's only a paper (and digital) moon

Status
Not open for further replies.

OnPoint

Member
17ed3049c4e15ad4c82e2d9a8449b040.png


what the goddamn fuck

I prefer Ice Age as well. Both sets have some cool cards, but are overall both absolute jank, and I say that as someone who came in during Ice Age and owns a complete set of it.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Force of Will does not save Alliances from being a jank set. It's a jank set.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I still don't think SaffronOlive's analysis that Grim Flayer is bad because a 4/4 Trampler that costs 2 mana is inherently bad in the format because of Sylvan Advocate makes any sense.

I mean, no it doesn't attack through Sylvan Advocate if the Advocate is turned on. But every Grim Flayer deck is probably playing their own Sylvan Advocates and probably 4 copies of Hissing Quagmire. And Sylvan Advocate is hardly the Lightning Bolt of the format where nothing that can't attack through it is playable nor does deck construction require that you only play creatures equal to the best creature in the entire format.

If Grim Flayer is bad, its because its too hard to turn on its ability.
 

OnPoint

Member
I feel like Flayer is bad because its ability is too hard to turn on. Also it dies to Languish. Also Advocate has better stats and is easier to cast. Also trample is worthless on a 2/2 (team #shouldabeendeathtouch). It's one of those cards that seems like it should work but it's just got too many little things that don't add up.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I feel like Flayer is bad because its ability is too hard to turn on. Also it dies to Languish. Also Advocate has better stats and is easier to cast. Also trample is worthless on a 2/2 (team #shouldabeendeathtouch). It's one of those cards that seems like it should work but it's just got too many little things that don't add up.

95% of creatures die to Languish and again, I don't instantly buy into "not as good as Sylvan Advocate" because lots and lots of playable cards are "not as good as Sylvan Advocate."

If Grim Flayer isn't good, its because its too hard to make him a 4/4.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Right. But sometimes Advocate doesn't. And that adds up to making a big difference in my judgement of Flayer.

Grim Flayer costs 2 mana and its combat ability is literally better than Scry 3. It isn't a mutually exclusive choice between Grim Flayer and Sylvan Advocate because by definition a Grim Flayer deck can also play Advocate and probably is.
 

OnPoint

Member
Grim Flayer costs 2 mana and its combat ability is literally better than Scry 3. It isn't a mutually exclusive choice between Grim Flayer and Sylvan Advocate because by definition a Grim Flayer deck can also play Advocate and probably is.

You're right. It isn't an absolute given. But which card has been getting the nod up until this Pro Tour? I would argue Advocate is/was seeing way more play.
 

An-Det

Member
Kinda awesome interaction in a Nic Fit deck in the legacy weekly on Tuesday: using Conch Horn to put Emrakul back on top of the deck so that he can sacrifice his Academy Rector to Evolutionary Leap to get the Emrakul in hand and Omniscience in play. He's played the deck for a while, but adding Conch Horn is pretty fantastic.

Edit: also he used Eldritch Evolution to go from 13 mana Emrakul to 15 mana Emrakul in an earlier game in our match.
 
I'm noticing some Emrakul fatigue in this thread already, but my view is that a finisher seeing a lot of play is much different from engine cards like Collected Company. For one thing, the game usually ends soon after Emrakul comes out, and the fact that it's the top end means that the rest of the deck can vary greatly from player to player (well, until the best version is found). In comparison, in this Standard, Collected Company leads to generally similar decks and is present during the entire match.

Latest Developments article on designing for Spike (the player type that cares about demonstrating their skill at the game).
 

OnPoint

Member
have you people looked at ice age recently

.

this was not a good set

Show me a set, especially a first set in a block, without jank.

I'm noticing some Emrakul fatigue in this thread already, but my view is that a finisher seeing a lot of play is much different from engine cards like Collected Company. For one thing, the game usually ends soon after Emrakul comes out, and the fact that it's the top end means that the rest of the deck can vary greatly from player to player (well, until the best version is found). In comparison, in this Standard, Collected Company leads to generally similar decks and is present during the entire match.

Latest Developments article on designing for Spike (the player type that cares about demonstrating their skill at the game).
I don't think anyone is sick of Emrakul yet? Just surprised.
 

y2dvd

Member
I don't think we were expressing fatigue. Just mentioning it is all. Glad to see anything besides CoCo and Spell Queller getting mentioned.
 
I still don't think SaffronOlive's analysis that Grim Flayer is bad because a 4/4 Trampler that costs 2 mana is inherently bad in the format because of Sylvan Advocate makes any sense.

Yeah, I completely agree with you here. And if anything today's results so far suggest it can get online pretty quickly.

Show me a set, especially a first set in a block, without jank.

Yeah, I mean obviously there are bad cards in every set, but I feel like these are pretty representative. Ice Age has only terrible mechanics, tons of super-janky mini themes, and lots of cards that were never good even at the time and have only gotten worse since. Alliances was much more revolutionary at the time and had a much greater proportion of solid, playable, coherently designed cards than its predecessor.
 
Did the walk of shame to my LGS this morning and picked up 2 emrakuls. I was looking at them yesterday but then thought I'd just trade for the 2 I want at fnm tonight. Nnnnnnnope. Not trading for those suckers at 30 or 40, so 14 cash it is. It was everywhere on camera last night.

I'm also sad we won't see sub-30 Liliana for a long time, if ever. I'm at 0 copies of her.

I've been brewing around Thalia's Lancers the last couple days. Being able to search out oaths is a great interaction for the card. It may make an Abzan, Bant, or esper superfriends viable because it also makes great defense. Costs 1 less than deploy the gatewatch, as well.

Know what card would be fantastic in current standard that saw no play in its time? Garruk, Apex Predator. It's casting cost seems almost trivial now.
 

OnPoint

Member
Yeah, I completely agree with you here. And if anything today's results so far suggest it can get online pretty quickly.



Yeah, I mean obviously there are bad cards in every set, but I feel like these are pretty representative. Ice Age has only terrible mechanics, tons of super-janky mini themes, and lots of cards that were never good even at the time and have only gotten worse since. Alliances was much more revolutionary at the time and had a much greater proportion of solid, playable, coherently designed cards than its predecessor.

Upon reviewing the Alliances cards due to this discussion, I have to agree, it's much less janky, especially compared to how I remember it. By a lot. I didn't realize Alliances stepped it up so hard. Like, there's a lot of unremarkable cards in the set. But man... Ice Age does dial it up.

That said, Ice Age has a lot of stuff that's great. The Pain Lands are a big one. Jester's Cap started a long fascination with artifacts that fuck with your opponent's library. Necropotence, we all know that one. Illusions of Grandeur is super fun to donate. Shit, Brainstorm was born here. I actually even like Cumulative Upkeep as a concept.

Still, I admit I needed another look at these sets to see the truth. I can admit I was originally wrong.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Ice Age Painlands were a huge FUCK YOU at the time because they were the first duals that weren't just legit duals.

Part of the reason I hated the set was the idea that they were going to print strictly worse versions of existing cards.
 

Joe Molotov

Member
Ice Age Painlands were a huge FUCK YOU at the time because they were the first duals that weren't just legit duals.

Part of the reason I hated the set was the idea that they were going to print strictly worse versions of existing cards.

Yeah but that Sulfurous Springs art, tho
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Yeah, I completely agree with you here. And if anything today's results so far suggest it can get online pretty quickly.



Yeah, I mean obviously there are bad cards in every set, but I feel like these are pretty representative. Ice Age has only terrible mechanics, tons of super-janky mini themes, and lots of cards that were never good even at the time and have only gotten worse since. Alliances was much more revolutionary at the time and had a much greater proportion of solid, playable, coherently designed cards than its predecessor.

A bunch of the jank posted were at common too so nobody had a clue what half the cards in the set were supposed to be doing
 

El Topo

Member
Ice Age had great flavor and an awesome set symbol. The set has evergreens we all love and cherish, like Illusionary Wall or the best Dark Ritual. On second thought, well, it still has the flavor and the symbol.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
I have no idea why I am playing Sealed League when I have enough time to play Swiss Draft (obviously I am not good enough to do shit in 8-4s).
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Every once in a while I try to imagine what my deck would look like if I was transported back to early '95 when I started playing and I had the resources to build a good deck.

I'm guessing I would play more copies of Serra Angel than I already was.
 
So why can I not tap my Leaf Gilder the turn I cast it, but you can tap your summon-sickness Knight on the same turn you summoned it via Town Gossipmonger's ability? Doesn't seem right.
 
What's everyone running at fnm tonight?

I've been on Bant company for the last 3 weeks after 2-2ing with brews for 2 months solid. I might try the temurge deck I saw last night at the PT. or blend that with some crush of tentacles goodness.
 

Joe Molotov

Member
So why can I not tap my Leaf Gilder the turn I cast it, but you can tap your summon-sickness Knight on the same turn you summoned it via Town Gossipmonger's ability? Doesn't seem right.

Summoning Sicking only stops a creature from attacking or tapping to use it's own activated ability. It can still be tapped for other reasons (i.e. to pay Gossipmonger's activation).
 
So why can I not tap my Leaf Gilder the turn I cast it, but you can tap your summon-sickness Knight on the same turn you summoned it via Town Gossipmonger's ability? Doesn't seem right.

Tapping through the arrow symbol and "Tap an untapped _" are separate things. One way to think about it is that the former is done by the creature while you, the player, are the one doing the latter. A spell that taps a creature can still tap a creature with summoning sickness. Thus, summoning sickness matters for the former but not the latter.
 
What's everyone running at fnm tonight?

I've been on Bant company for the last 3 weeks after 2-2ing with brews for 2 months solid. I might try the temurge deck I saw last night at the PT. or blend that with some crush of tentacles goodness.

I have three local stores to play FNM at, one of which it is doing Modern, the other is a Booster draft (which they seem to do most of the time) and I don't know about the third store.

I'm pretty excited to play Modern at FNM.
 
Every once in a while I try to imagine what my deck would look like if I was transported back to early '95 when I started playing and I had the resources to build a good deck.

I'm guessing I would play more copies of Serra Angel than I already was.

My deck in 1995 was a stack of literally every card that I had. My friend and I would play in the rec room after school and neither of us knew the rules.
 

Ashodin

Member
What's everyone running at fnm tonight?

I've been on Bant company for the last 3 weeks after 2-2ing with brews for 2 months solid. I might try the temurge deck I saw last night at the PT. or blend that with some crush of tentacles goodness.

my store never does standard :(
 

An-Det

Member
[QUOTE="God's Beard!";212569734]I don't even own a functioning MTG deck. My Kozilek EDH deck uses face down cards in sleeves because I only own like 5 Wastes lol[/QUOTE]

I got too lazy to find more of my Urza's Saga swamps so I started forests in my mono-Black Oona deck. Wastes have got to be even worse.
 
I really think that Karn, Silver Golem and the new Kozilek are the only real colorless EDH commanders. There's not really a ton of viable strategies, and those two are the only two that really let you do something once you've dumped all your mana rocks. Emrakul is powerful, but there's a real risk of just going hellbent and getting run over.

I have a bunch of wastes from drafting. Even sold a foil waste.

braggin'
 
What's everyone running at fnm tonight?

I've been on Bant company for the last 3 weeks after 2-2ing with brews for 2 months solid. I might try the temurge deck I saw last night at the PT. or blend that with some crush of tentacles goodness.

To answer your question though, I'm taking Modern Jund.
I wish I had Kalitas, but I think I'll put in a couple Abbot of Keral Keep in there.
 

bigkrev

Member
Because we are talking about Ice Age block era, here, from Inquest Magazine, is a Financial review for the just released Homelands set!

Few things to note
- "Could be hard to get!"
-Correctly identified Baron Sengir as overrated, but makes no mention of Ishan's Shade
-Have you ever heard of primal order?


CpH7itwXgAQ-u1Q.jpg
CpH7itwWgAAYUnd.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom