He liked Titanic and Star Trek too. He doesn't have to hate a movie to do a Plinkett review. The review will probably partially focus on what TFA did right (yay, more prequel bashing?) and how it used elements from all three movies of the original TrilogyIt has all been said already, like with the PT, but (like with the PT) I suppose people are looking for validity either way. For some reason. But didn't they like it? I recall "Plinkett" saying that it was everything he wanted, but he could put on a guise and rip it to shreds.
He liked Titanic and Star Trek too. He doesn't have to hate a movie to do a Plinkett review. The review will probably partially focus on what TFA did right (yay, more prequel bashing?) and how it used elements from all three movies of the original Trilogy
we had a recent flare up of prequel hate on this site because a few people could not admit that there is anything majorly wrong with the prequels and that they, in fact, were bold and took risks.
ROTS was a bloated schlock fest and could have done with half an hour shaving off.
Any recommendations?
Is this a reference in disguise as bait?RLM continues to confuse me because I've never seen a video where they are actually funny.
Huh? It was the shortest SW film and IMO had by far the best pacing of the three. I didn't feel there was any bloat whatsoever. If anything most people say it moves too fast and certain things happen too quickly lol
I imagine a lot of people's exposure to Mr. Plinkett is the Prequel reviews, where he eviscerated them, and they are expecting more of the same. Unfortunately for them, we have a Star Trek 2009 situation on our hands, so they will probably be thoroughly disappointed.Why are people excited for their TFA review again?
Really? I felt it was quite muddled and felt the bits where Kenobi was going after Grievous coupled with the final lightsabre duel were quite meandering.
Huh? It was the shortest SW film and IMO had by far the best pacing of the three. I didn't feel there was any bloat whatsoever. If anything most people say it moves too fast and certain things happen too quickly lol
I still like both very much, especially RLM.GAF turned on RLM. Just liked they turned on AVGN.
I like this a lot more than the "I don't like thing" comic
I think the Mustafar fight should have been much shorter and the Sidious vs Yoda fight, the Kashyyk and Grievious subplots should have been omitted.
Dedicate all that time on explaining Anakin turning to the Dark side. That is the climax of you trilogy not the final fight with Obi Wan. That fight could have lasted half as much and still have the same if not more impact.
I thought it did explain it, but it wasn't enough for some. Oh well. But nah, the climax is Anakin and Obi-Wan's fight, and what happens to Anakin there. The Grievous/Kashyyk subplots were pretty short and didn't take much time away from the movie IMO. Like any movie there's going to be subplots and there's more going on than just Anakin.
I'd agree with the other poster, the climax is when anakin turns. it's the....ahem....turning point of the movie. the fight is a result of that.
The fight is the climax of the film though. The climax of a story isn't 2/3 of the way into the thing and isn't necessarily a "turning point." The fight leading to Anakin's wounds and being put in the suit is the climax.
disagree. can't see how anakin turning to the dark side isn't a turning point. regardless of the physical wounds the damage was already done. hence why they were fighting in the first place.
Why does the fight need to be 10 minutes long to accomplish that though? All the actual character stuff happens in the first and last thirty seconds. Hopping on Super Mario lava bridges doesn't influence Darth Vadar as a character.I'd agree with the other poster, the climax is when anakin turns. it's the....ahem....turning point of the movie. the fight is a result of that.
Why does the fight need to be 10 minutes long to accomplish that though? All the actual character stuff happens in the first and last thirty seconds. Hopping on Super Mario lava bridges doesn't influence Darth Vadar as a character.
Why does the fight need to be 10 minutes long to accomplish that though? All the actual character stuff happens in the first and last thirty seconds. Hopping on Super Mario lava bridges doesn't influence Darth Vadar as a character.
yeah the fight sucks. I got more out of the saber fight at the end of a new hope.
A few critics I like, off the top of my head. Kermode & Mayo, Michael Phillips, AO Scott, Devin Faraci, Jen Yamato, David Ehrlich, The Filmspotting Podcast.
There was a saber fight at the end of A New Hope? Ah, yeah. Sorry, I'm just mis-remembering, there's a saber fight at the end of The Force Awakens and since that's a retread of ANH, that means ANH has a saber fight at the end, too.
both are a kenobi vs. a dark skywalker too!
Whenever i enter a thread with overwhelmingly hate towards something i always think to myself "This must be amazing because GAF hates it"
Why are people excited for their TFA review again?
I feel like everything has been said about TFA already
No matter what you think the climax is that fight should have been shorter and had more dialogue interspersed with the fighting. It isn't about the fight itself but the relationship between the characters. You didn't need to have them tour an entire molten steel factory to show that.I thought it did explain it, but it wasn't enough for some. Oh well. But nah, the climax is Anakin and Obi-Wan's fight, and what happens to Anakin there.
The Grievous/Kashyyk subplots were pretty short and didn't take much time away from the movie IMO. Like any movie there's going to be subplots and there's more going on than just Anakin.
No matter what you think
GAF turned on RLM. Just liked they turned on AVGN.
They haven't done a Plinkett review in a while.I know the Plinkett stuff brings in a lot of views, but I honestly like all their other stuff better and they should just retire it before it gets too stale
When's even the last time we had a Plinkett review? Indiana Jones 4? That was over two years ago.I know the Plinkett stuff brings in a lot of views, but I honestly like all their other stuff better and they should just retire it before it gets too stale
When's even the last time we had a Plinkett review? Indiana Jones 4? That was over two years ago.
I feel like there was more substance to this than that weird review they did of Dan Aykroyd's vodka brand recently.