Watch Ono re-unveils it as Dragons Dogma 2
We know it's not connected to Dragon's Dogma (though Capcom could easily retcon that if they decided to). The connection comes from early reports that compared the gameplay to DD.
http://www.gameinformer.com/games/d...rned-playing-capcom-39-s-dungeon-crawler.aspx
http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/12...memento-buffs-online-corpse-looting-and-more/
!!!!!!!!!
Need confirmation before my hype gets the best of me.
You know me Sesha. You know how cynical I usually am about DMC5 and how I worry about every little thing about it. But even I'm not worried about Itsuno working on Deep Down instead of DMC5.Some didn't get the memo:
Especially since they thought Itsuno could be connected if this was DD2, when he had very little to do with Dark Arisen and Online.
It at least means they haven't given up on the idea.
But yeah you can make a new trademark and still do nothing with it.
Scanned the thread and didn't see this posted.
Want to know why this was filed? It's boring.
The original mark was an intent-to-use application. Capcom only had a set amount of time to show the mark was actually being used (by publishing a game with that name, not just announcing it). They ran out of time. Now they have to file a new one and the old one will expire.
Basically, nothing to see here other than the fact that the game isn't cancelled.
No you can't.
See? It's dead.Scanned the thread and didn't see this posted.
Want to know why this was filed? It's boring.
The original mark was an intent-to-use application. Capcom only had a set amount of time to show the mark was actually being used (by publishing a game with that name, not just announcing it). They ran out of time. Now they have to file a new one and the old one will expire.
Basically, nothing to see here other than the fact that the game isn't cancelled.
Scanned the thread and didn't see this posted.
Want to know why this was filed? It's boring.
The original mark was an intent-to-use application. Capcom only had a set amount of time to show the mark was actually being used (by publishing a game with that name, not just announcing it). They ran out of time. Now they have to file a new one and the old one will expire.
Basically, nothing to see here other than the fact that the game isn't cancelled.
No you can't.
Scanned the thread and didn't see this posted.
Want to know why this was filed? It's boring.
The original mark was an intent-to-use application. Capcom only had a set amount of time to show the mark was actually being used (by publishing a game with that name, not just announcing it). They ran out of time. Now they have to file a new one and the old one will expire.
Basically, nothing to see here other than the fact that the game isn't cancelled.
No you can't.
Maybe they were moving it to Re engine
So you can't make a trademark for a game that ends up getting canceled for one reason or another? That's what I meant. I don't think the Trademark people are gonna come to capcoms door about that.
You need to actually intend to use it. And Trademark people, no. They don't do that. But another business could and Capcom would be in serious legal trouble potentially if they were filing intent to use applications without any actual intent to use.
His Twitter banner has always been that.
Yeah, the lack of Deep Down yet again at E3 was noticeable. At this point I've got to assume it's dead, which is a shame because it was the game I had the most hype for out of the original PS4 titles.