• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo has taken back potentially stolen Nintendo Switch

Status
Not open for further replies.

WadeitOut

Member
So many retailers fuck up with shipping and release dates that he has a pretty convincing case for ignorance here, whomever he bought it from

Nintendo should reimburse him. He only fanned hype for this thing

Guys. Seriously. Read the edit in the OP before you do this to yourself.
 

mrk8885

Banned
I think some of you are too easily accepting his side of the story here. This definitely doesn't warrant some anti Nintendo mobilization. The whole story is fishy.
 

MrS

Banned
???

Does Gaf's love include wanting their consoles to fail so that they can play nintendo games on their playstation 4?
I'm 28, their IPs don't appeal to me any more and their games simply aren't made for me. I couldn't care less if they fail or succeed tbh, but I do think the way they treat their loyal fanbase is straight up disrespectful with regards to withholding information about Switch, putting out hardware inferior to current gen norms and the general lack of good games, 1st and 3rd party, on their consoles.

On topic: Hiphoptherobot, you gonna buy a Switch at launch or has Nintendo now lost any goodwill you had for it?
 

Not

Banned
Stolen or not, it's not a great look for Nintendo PR and drums up old feelings about their oppressive company culture with respect to their fanbase. And the leak did Nintendo more good than harm, since the OS was a lingering question many fans and potential purchasers wanted answered.

Thiiiiis. Nintendo completely underestimated their consumers' desire to see the UI in a comprehensive way.

Nintendo's best at underestimating things. Goes with their conservative title.

It wouldn't have been nearly as big of a deal.
 

sneas78

Banned
If not for the fame then for the glory.. the dream may be dead but we must go further. How do you know this was Nintendo?
 

mrk8885

Banned
He doesn't even pick a side from what I read. He even said he didn't feel right having it


We'll from the jump it was "a retailer sent it out. "

Now it seems more like "yea I bought it from a guy two weeks early. " kinda different.

I also saw a few people suggesting we start a fundraiser to buy him a switch which seems crazy to me. But hey it's your money.
 

brawly

Member
I don't know why anyone believes that Nintendo got involved or took the system back. The guy claimed he received it early, then later claimed that he bought it from someone (be that a store or a someone on craigsist). His story doesn't add up, and the only thing that's known for sure is he got one early.

I wouldn't be surprised if he made up Nintendo contacting him, him giving it back, or anything about a third party getting involved.

I think the dude's full of shit.

And he would do this because...?
 
Fuck them, I wish I was him just to say fuck you Nintendo, that's not legal.

It's actually quite legal. Nintendo did nothing to abandon their right of title to the device and the buying party bears the burden of the risk when purchasing from a gray market retailer.

Legal or not, however, it's not a great look for PR. Hopefully they attempt to make amends in some way.

EDIT: I am speaking generally, the actual legal precedent would likely depend on state law and whether it has adopted the UCC, but not knowing that info drives my analysis.
 

WadeitOut

Member
Thiiiiis. Nintendo completely underestimated their consumers' desire to see the UI in a comprehensive way.

Nintendo's best at underestimating things. Goes with their conservative title.

It wouldn't have been nearly as big of a deal.

...there was likely a pallet of consoles stolen.

How are you people not exhausted from the mental gymnastics required to make Nintendo the bad guy here.


It's actually quite legal. Nintendo did nothing to abandon their right of title to the device and the buying party bears the burden of the risk when purchasing from a gray market retailer.

He didn't get it from a retailer.
 

BasicUAE

Member
GAF reading the OP, jumping to conclusions.

l0Ex8gBXY5YyxyAWA.gif


And I was there with you
 
This really didn't need its own thread especially considering HHR's explicit words that he didn't want to spread it and was fine with the outcome.

For those needing a summary, this is apparently what happened:

Shipment of Switches "went missing"
Said shipment changed hands a few times
Eventually wound up in HipHopRobot's hands
Nintendo went "Hey that's one of the Switches that went missing"
Lawyer contacted HHR
Just because HHR didn't know the Switch was stolen at some point in its journey to him, doesn't get him off the hook for buying stolen goods
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat
Nintendo was "cool" in that they understand while he himself did not steal it, it was still stolen, so they are not pressing charges as long as he returns the console to them
 
Then... why show it off to the Internets? That's like when people leak random info from their jobs. Is it worth getting fired over?

But to be honest we don't even know if it was really Nintendo that contacted him. Also what's weird is that he said he received it early so how is it that he bought it from someone? That's two different situations 💀
 

Frodo

Member
Weird story.


It would be nice if Nintendo sent hiphoptherobot a Switch once it is officially released, though.

This really didn't need its own thread especially considering HHR's explicit words that he didn't want to spread it and was fine with the outcome.

For those needing a summary, this is apparently what happened:

Shipment of Switches "went missing"
Said shipment changed hands a few times
Eventually wound up in HipHopRobot's hands
Nintendo went "Hey that's one of the Switches that went missing"
Lawyer contacted HHR
Just because HHR didn't know the Switch was stolen at some point in its journey to him, doesn't get him off the hook for buying stolen goods
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat
Nintendo was "cool" in that they understand while he himself did not steal it, it was still stolen, so they are not pressing charges as long as he returns the console to them

This should go on the OP.
 

NolbertoS

Member
Amazing people saying he should be reimbursed for buying stolen goods.

Cmon now.

Yeah, exactly. On that note, I want Sony to re-imburse me on my PS2 that got robbed and somebody sold it to someone else, because I bought legit at a EB Games store. People will come out and bash Nintendo for anything. If I were that guys manager at a Starbucks or whatever other coffee ahop he works, I'd fire his ass because what other shady deals would be be doing at work too.
 

Spy

Member
This really didn't need its own thread especially considering HHR's explicit words that he didn't want to spread it and was fine with the outcome.

For those needing a summary, this is apparently what happened:

Shipment of Switches "went missing"
Said shipment changed hands a few times
Eventually wound up in HipHopRobot's hands
Nintendo went "Hey that's one of the Switches that went missing"
Lawyer contacted HHR
Just because HHR didn't know the Switch was stolen at some point in its journey to him, doesn't get him off the hook for buying stolen goods
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat
Nintendo was "cool" in that they understand while he himself did not steal it, it was still stolen, so they are not pressing charges as long as he returns the console to them
This is a gaming news website and this is news.
 

Curler

Unconfirmed Member
But to be honest we don't even know if it was really Nintendo that contacted him. Also what's weird is that he said he received it early so how is it that he bought it from someone? That's two different situations 💀

I mean I guess anyone can pose as "Nintendo" and just find his IP address...

Still, he said he is "out the money" so he did pay something for it. It wasn't just a gift. That is, IF he is even telling the truth about it.
 

Wereroku

Member
People really need to chill out. Owning stolen goods is an offense in and of itself. Usually you will not be charged for it though as long as you cooperate and return the items. After that his choice would be to take the person who sold it to him to court to get his money back. However $300 bucks in small claims court would probably not be worth the time and money it would take to get it back.

Except he never needed to post anything about it going back to Nintendo at all.

People were still asking for information and he is taking his videos down.
 
It's actually quite legal. Nintendo did nothing to abandon their right of title to the device and the buying party bears the burden of the risk when purchasing from a gray market retailer.

Legal or not, however, it's not a great look for PR. Hopefully they attempt to make amends in some way.

They were totally in the right to take it back and I wish someone would edit the thread title as I already said I didn't really want a new thread about it.
 

wrowa

Member
Even if he didn't know? Rip

Of course.

Simple example: Your watch gets stolen, the thief sells the watch to someone else, later the watch gets identified as yours. Do you think you'd need to refund the new "owner" of your watch the money they paid to the thief?

The anwser is: Of course not, it's your watch and never stopped being your watch. The buyer might have been unaware that they bought stolen goods, but this doesn't change that the seller was never allowed to sell it in the first place. It sucks for that person, but sometimes in life you just have straight up bad luck.

Well, the seller would theoretically need to refund him, but thiefs are kinda peculiar in that regard. ;)

Of course, you might want to ask the question if a billion dollar company should have just given him those measly 300$ regardless, but they definitely aren't required to. Would have been a nice gesture if he really couldn't have known better, but if it was obvious that this was a dubious transaction then eh, I don't know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom