• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bannon told German envoy he views EU as flawed construct, wants per nation relations

Status
Not open for further replies.

capslock

Is jealous of Matlock's emoticon
Great. Europe should want per-state relationships then: separate agreements for California versus, say, Mississippi.
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
Trump made me more appreciative of the EU. Please give me my boring bureaucrats who provide stability and adult leadership.

I just wish we could finally push reform through the EU to grasp our hidden potential as a collective of developed, resourceful nations, and that we somehow figure out how to solve the economic malaise in the south that has been dragging along.
Nothing has made me more Pro-EU than the fucks who oppose it. I never really cared too much either way before. I don't mean that there aren't any problems with it either, just... fuck me. These twats are far from the solution to any of them.
 

kavanf1

Member
Whenever discussions about the success or failure of the EU come up, I don't think we often enough cast our minds back to why the EEC (then EC, EU) was created in the first place. Along with NATO and the UN, these alliances were built to minimise the likelihood of future world wars by improving trading relations and stability between nations. While there are absolutely flaws that exist in the evolution of the EU, what worries me is that those who deliberately seek to destroy it instead of fixing it are paving the way to repeating history.

The trouble is that to say something like this, you're accused of scaremongering because on the surface that's all it looks like. However, descension towards war doesn't happen suddenly, it happens because of multiple, incremental, comparatively minor circumstances which cumulatively lead to terrible consequences. Pointing out any one of these minor circumstances does sound like needless hand-wringing. But without pointing them out, if we wait until things have got to the point that war is inevitable, by then it's obviously too late. So the cross to bear if you believe that people should be working towards collective stability, not insularity, is that you will be told you're being hysterical and scaremongering and exaggerating about those who just want the best for their country.
 

Pomerlaw

Member
China isn't a friendly force for good.

They are bargain bin hunters buying out things after disaster hits

At least they are doing something for global warning, while half the americans believe it is not man made and the president thinks it's a hoax.

HINT : Global warming is the most important issue we face in the coming years - denying it's dangers is one of the most evil things someone can do.
 

Madness

Member
economic union was a great idea
this wannabe super state is a mess

I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.

As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
 

GuyKazama

Member
This has always been Bannon's perspective. From a US point of view, it is better to negotiate individually than with the EU as a whole -- that is the major reason for the EU, to give them a better negotiating position.

The EU concept, unlike NATO, is too flawed to survive. Europeans that I've met think of their own national identity first vs describing themselves as 'Europeans.' I also doubt they want to be run by Germany -- except those that are German.
 

frontovik

Banned
...While there are absolutely flaws that exist in the evolution of the EU, what worries me is that those who deliberately seek to destroy it instead of fixing it are paving the way to repeating history.

The trouble is that to say something like this, you're accused of scaremongering because on the surface that's all it looks like. However, descension towards war doesn't happen suddenly, it happens because of multiple, incremental, comparatively minor circumstances which cumulatively lead to terrible consequences.

Very well put, and I completely agree. I find it very troubling that the US wants to dismantle the EU instead of collaborating to work out the flaws. Alas, it's the human tendency towards greed and indolence.
 

kiguel182

Member
Of course a nationalist is against EU. The whole point of it was to unite under a banner that isn't our own country.

In practice that isn't exactly what happened but it's better than "every man for themselves".

My views on the EU were shaken ever since the mishandling of our most recent crisis but, today, I believe that staying together is our best bet against the US and Russia.

The EU is very imperfect but it's a far cry from the loonies in charge on the US and UK.
 

Carn82

Member
Europeans that I've met think of their own national identity first vs describing themselves as 'Europeans.'

That's because Europe isnt a country. We all speak different languages, and have looooong histories tied to our countries. Sure, I would consider myself to be Dutch first, but I also consider myself to be European. Many people I know think likewise.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
That's because Europe isnt a country. We all speak different languages, and have looooong histories tied to our countries. Sure, I would consider myself to be Dutch first, but I also consider myself to be European. Many people I know think likewise.

European Union is closer to Soviet Union than USA in that sense, individual cultures with their own long histories, strong national identities, and very limited willingness to sacrifice national interests to the greater good.
 
Nationalism - centuries of warfare over petty squabbles by the ruling classes for land and glory, millions of common folk dead and injured
"Globalism" - 70 years of peace in europe
 

Ac30

Member
This has always been Bannon's perspective. From a US point of view, it is better to negotiate individually than with the EU as a whole -- that is the major reason for the EU, to give them a better negotiating position.

The EU concept, unlike NATO, is too flawed to survive. Europeans that I've met think of their own national identity first vs describing themselves as 'Europeans.' I also doubt they want to be run by Germany -- except those that are German.

The EU concept can survive fine, the monetary union is far more likely to suffer before the political union, especially in Greece and Italy. I wonder where many of these anti-EU folk live, though, I'm sure Slovenia would love to start negotiating bilateral deals with a trading partner hundreds of times their size.
 
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.

As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.


lol
 

dumbo

Member
"That's an interesting point Stephen. Within the EU, we see the US as a flawed construct, and want per-state relations."

That would have been a fun conversation.
 

chadskin

Member
A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble has intervened in Brussels to prevent the European Union from imposing financial sanctions against Spain and Portugal for violating deficit rules, Handelsblatt has learned. Mr. Schäuble personally called several E.U. commissioners to make the case against imposing financial sanctions, high-ranking E.U. diplomats told Handelsblatt. As a consequence, only four commissioners supported financial sanctions during a meeting on Wednesday.
https://global.handelsblatt.com/exc...ster-prevents-spain-portugal-sanctions-676540
 

Micael

Member
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. [BGreece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. [/B]Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.

As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.

I genuinely hadn't heard this argument for Greece failing economy before.

...and his is how the EU started it's heavier trading with...well...just about everyone else.

Its a good thing that the US isn't alienating south america, or else the EU might be in a prime position to make deals with them, especially considering they just so happen to have Portugal and Spain as its members, which for absolutely no reason what so ever do have ties with those countries.
 

JustenP88

I earned 100 Gamerscore™ for collecting 300 widgets and thereby created Trump's America
#WeakerTogether?

This shit is all too transparent. When America's interests wrt the EU all the sudden line up 1:1 with Russia's, Western Europe has every reason to be concerned. Resist, ya'll.
 

boingball

Member
The United States Federal Government is a flawed construct. Countries should have relations with single states,e g. California and New York, and bypass the US Federal Government.
 
China is not trying to break up the EU, but likes to establish bilateral relations when/where possible since dealing with the EU as a whole is not nearly as advantageous. Bannon obviously takes this position to the extreme.

But EU countries do make bilateral relationships. I remember France going to China drooling to get a contract from the Chinese to buy Airbus or something like that. I actually think that is ok. I am very much pro EU but you can still make relationship outside of the EU.
 

Dingens

Member
says the guy from the flawless construct where a majority in votes doesn't necessarily translate into winning. great stuff.


seems like the hard-line republicans are finally showing their true face. This kind of "economic hate" against Europe isn't new and goes way back, at least until the 80s, probably even further. But this is probably the first time their agenda is visible this clearly. Former administrations at least tried to hide their dissatisfaction
 

Micael

Member
A flawed construct, sure, but better than dealing with superpowers like the US piecemeal.

The best part for me about all this, is that if china manages to grow their economy into something proper for its population size, the US will in fact need to unite with the EU to properly negotiate with it.
So a divided EU would be bad for the US in the short term (biggest trading partner), and it is probably bad for the US in the long term also.
 

Funky Papa

FUNK-Y-PPA-4
But EU countries do make bilateral relationships. I remember France going to China drooling to get a contract from the Chinese to buy Airbus or something like that. I actually think that is ok. I am very much pro EU but you can still make relationship outside of the EU.

You absolutely can in some areas. That doesn't mean that China doesn't try to push as much as it can in terms of treaties. This has nothing to do with particular sales like Airbus planes and whatnot but broader things such as trade and collaboration agreements.
 

mnz

Unconfirmed Member
But EU countries do make bilateral relationships. I remember France going to China drooling to get a contract from the Chinese to buy Airbus or something like that. I actually think that is ok. I am very much pro EU but you can still make relationship outside of the EU.
That's not what that is. The trade deals we're talking about are about laws, tariffs and regulations. This one is just a contract.
 

Dehnus

Member
The best part for me about all this, is that if china manages to grow their economy into something proper for its population size, the US will in fact need to unite with the EU to properly negotiate with it.
So a divided EU would be bad for the US in the short term (biggest trading partner), and it is probably bad for the US in the long term also.

What's this long term thing you are talking about? How does a 70+ year old Babyboomer President deal with long term thinking when he can just do a quick score with a population with similar short term thinking at hand? All this stuff about world peace and becoming one world? PFFT, let the young uns worry about that... after they took care of him, they can also fix the planet.
 

Oriel

Member
Well, he's right

About what, the breakup of the EU? As a European Union citizen, can I ask what right do Americans have to seek the breakup of a political union that is of great relevance and importance to me? If a European politician actively endorsed the view that the US should be broken up they would be told to get fucked....and then get fucked some more.
 

GAMEPROFF

Banned
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.

As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
I hope so much that you are young and not allowed to vote yet. Oh boy.
 

spwolf

Member
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.

As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.


- Spain and Portugal as well as Italy are integral part of Western Europe. There could be no EU without them. If EU did not have south european countries, there would be no EU.

- Brits hating Polish influx is like Trump supporters hating Mexicans. Makes no sense, it is not grounded in reality.

- Greece has been struggling for more than a hundred years. It is first state that declared bankruptcy in modern times. It has nothing to do with EU, and clearly it has nothing to do with refugees as it happened much before that.

- French and Italian farmers have benefited greatly from EU. They get to peddle their state supported goods everywhere else at dumping prices and nobody can fight EU on it.

- Whole point of EU and what people dont like is economic measures which means limiting deficit. Everything else is just fluff. There is no way it can ever be more unified than now economically and there is absolutely no way they could do a military together.
 
- Spain and Portugal as well as Italy are integral part of Western Europe. There could be no EU without them. If EU did not have south european countries, there would be no EU.

- Brits hating Polish influx is like Trump supporters hating Mexicans. Makes no sense, it is not grounded in reality.

- Greece has been struggling for more than a hundred years. It is first state that declared bankruptcy in modern times. It has nothing to do with EU, and clearly it has nothing to do with refugees as it happened much before that.

- French and Italian farmers have benefited greatly from EU. They get to peddle their state supported goods everywhere else at dumping prices and nobody can fight EU on it.

- Whole point of EU and what people dont like is economic measures which means limiting deficit. Everything else is just fluff. There is no way it can ever be more unified than now economically and there is absolutely no way they could do a military together.

Great post, especially what you said about Greece.
 

m3k

Member
Yeah, we should disassemble the organisation that secured peace in europe for the longest timeperiode ever.

basically

america/banon/trump will not help you country.

... fourth reich? jesus i think thats not whats happening at all
 

gcubed

Member
In the list of NB Bannonisms going around, this is the least egregious. Bad yes, but he's so bad that this made me shrug... I guess that's the point?
 

Palculator

Unconfirmed Member
Regardless of the actual influence Germany has in the European Union — which is undoubtedly a lot — allusions to the Third Reich are clearly done out of contempt. Ignore them, because the people making them are wank pheasants.
 

avaya

Member
The US should be considered a hostile nation state by the EU. I can't even believe I am typing that but it is where we are. The Anglosphere is on full on facist meltdown and needs to be saved from itself.

I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.

An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.

As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.

The German's weren't the one's pushing for expansion, it was the British.

The EU's problems today stem from lack of further Federalisation, politician's have sold some myths about Southern Europe for short term political expediency. The solution is ever greater union and I hope the EU continues down this path.
 

kavanf1

Member
Greece has been struggling for more than a hundred years. It is first state that declared bankruptcy in modern times. It has nothing to do with EU, and clearly it has nothing to do with refugees as it happened much before that.
I was on holiday in Greece a couple of years ago and talked to the locals about this. It's much less about being in the EU than it is about the fact that geographically Greece is composed of so many islands, many of which are tourist havens, so bring in huge amounts of money relative to many parts of mainland Greece. Not an issue in and of itself - the issue is that the oversight of taxation which should make its way back to central government to manage the country's infrastructure is utterly appalling. Effectively many islands operate as their own economies, with insignificant levels of tax payments making their way back to the main government due to cash in hand and straight up corruption; from the local handyman right through to large businesses, tax evasion is rife and consequently some parts of Greece do really well but the country as a whole suffers greatly. Unless and until they actually address this, then it doesn't matter what construct Greece is or isn't a part of, the root cause of their problems will never be resolved.
 
The US should be considered a hostile nation state by the EU. I can't even believe I am typing that but it is where we are. The Anglosphere is on full on facist meltdown and needs to be saved from itself.



The German's weren't the one's pushing for expansion, it was the British.

The EU's problems today stem from lack of further Federalisation, politician's have sold some myths about Southern Europe for short term political expediency. The solution is ever greater union and I hope the EU continues down this path.

What exactly would the EU do to the US? Sanctions????
 

Xando

Member
What exactly would the EU do to the US? Sanctions????
While the economic costs are undoubtedly to high to sanction the US it would be quite interesting to see how fast corporate america would kick Trump out of the white house when they can't sell in europe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom