Nothing has made me more Pro-EU than the fucks who oppose it. I never really cared too much either way before. I don't mean that there aren't any problems with it either, just... fuck me. These twats are far from the solution to any of them.Trump made me more appreciative of the EU. Please give me my boring bureaucrats who provide stability and adult leadership.
I just wish we could finally push reform through the EU to grasp our hidden potential as a collective of developed, resourceful nations, and that we somehow figure out how to solve the economic malaise in the south that has been dragging along.
China isn't a friendly force for good.
They are bargain bin hunters buying out things after disaster hits
economic union was a great idea
this wannabe super state is a mess
...While there are absolutely flaws that exist in the evolution of the EU, what worries me is that those who deliberately seek to destroy it instead of fixing it are paving the way to repeating history.
The trouble is that to say something like this, you're accused of scaremongering because on the surface that's all it looks like. However, descension towards war doesn't happen suddenly, it happens because of multiple, incremental, comparatively minor circumstances which cumulatively lead to terrible consequences.
Europeans that I've met think of their own national identity first vs describing themselves as 'Europeans.'
That's because Europe isnt a country. We all speak different languages, and have looooong histories tied to our countries. Sure, I would consider myself to be Dutch first, but I also consider myself to be European. Many people I know think likewise.
This has always been Bannon's perspective. From a US point of view, it is better to negotiate individually than with the EU as a whole -- that is the major reason for the EU, to give them a better negotiating position.
The EU concept, unlike NATO, is too flawed to survive. Europeans that I've met think of their own national identity first vs describing themselves as 'Europeans.' I also doubt they want to be run by Germany -- except those that are German.
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.
An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.
As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.
https://global.handelsblatt.com/exc...ster-prevents-spain-portugal-sanctions-676540German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble has intervened in Brussels to prevent the European Union from imposing financial sanctions against Spain and Portugal for violating deficit rules, Handelsblatt has learned. Mr. Schäuble personally called several E.U. commissioners to make the case against imposing financial sanctions, high-ranking E.U. diplomats told Handelsblatt. As a consequence, only four commissioners supported financial sanctions during a meeting on Wednesday.
Bannon: You guys used to be cooler when Hitler was a thing
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.
An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. [BGreece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. [/B]Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.
As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
...and his is how the EU started it's heavier trading with...well...just about everyone else.
China is not trying to break up the EU, but likes to establish bilateral relations when/where possible since dealing with the EU as a whole is not nearly as advantageous. Bannon obviously takes this position to the extreme.
A flawed construct, sure, but better than dealing with superpowers like the US piecemeal.
But EU countries do make bilateral relationships. I remember France going to China drooling to get a contract from the Chinese to buy Airbus or something like that. I actually think that is ok. I am very much pro EU but you can still make relationship outside of the EU.
That's not what that is. The trade deals we're talking about are about laws, tariffs and regulations. This one is just a contract.But EU countries do make bilateral relationships. I remember France going to China drooling to get a contract from the Chinese to buy Airbus or something like that. I actually think that is ok. I am very much pro EU but you can still make relationship outside of the EU.
The best part for me about all this, is that if china manages to grow their economy into something proper for its population size, the US will in fact need to unite with the EU to properly negotiate with it.
So a divided EU would be bad for the US in the short term (biggest trading partner), and it is probably bad for the US in the long term also.
USA is a flawed construct
Well, he's right
I hope so much that you are young and not allowed to vote yet. Oh boy.I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.
An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.
As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
Asked if Trump WH is committed to preservation of EU, Spicer cites Pence remarks that US will "work with those nations. no update on that"
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.
An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.
As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
- Spain and Portugal as well as Italy are integral part of Western Europe. There could be no EU without them. If EU did not have south european countries, there would be no EU.
- Brits hating Polish influx is like Trump supporters hating Mexicans. Makes no sense, it is not grounded in reality.
- Greece has been struggling for more than a hundred years. It is first state that declared bankruptcy in modern times. It has nothing to do with EU, and clearly it has nothing to do with refugees as it happened much before that.
- French and Italian farmers have benefited greatly from EU. They get to peddle their state supported goods everywhere else at dumping prices and nobody can fight EU on it.
- Whole point of EU and what people dont like is economic measures which means limiting deficit. Everything else is just fluff. There is no way it can ever be more unified than now economically and there is absolutely no way they could do a military together.
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. .
Yeah, we should disassemble the organisation that secured peace in europe for the longest timeperiode ever.
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich
I don't know. I consider the EU sort of a German fourth reich because it has dominated almost all spheres of influence. The EU expanded far too quick, and incorporated too many countries who do not have the same economic or social policies. Think of Greece and Spain and Portugal. A few months back there was talk of Germany wanting to sanction Spain and Portugal for not doing enough to decrease deficits.
An economic union makes sense if everyone shares the same mentality. Sure you can bring in different nations. One of the reason Germany wanted more Eastern European or Balkan countries was to get cheaper migrants and workforce to compete with the US/Mexico and China and India. Free movement both had benefits and disadvantages. Look how much the Brits hate the influx of Poles, how much French and Italian farmers hate how their industries have been affected by cheaper agriculture from elsewhere. Greece still hasn't recovered and it is struggling because as an EU nation, refugees and migrants think if they reach Greece they can get to Berlin and Paris and London easily. Without the UK though, and incressing fragmentation, we might see the decline of this super state back into a sensible union, with a more unified economic and possibly even military union.
As for OP, wtf is Bannon even doing meeting with these groups. Even worse is how the US is alienating their closest allies to cozy up to Russia.
I was on holiday in Greece a couple of years ago and talked to the locals about this. It's much less about being in the EU than it is about the fact that geographically Greece is composed of so many islands, many of which are tourist havens, so bring in huge amounts of money relative to many parts of mainland Greece. Not an issue in and of itself - the issue is that the oversight of taxation which should make its way back to central government to manage the country's infrastructure is utterly appalling. Effectively many islands operate as their own economies, with insignificant levels of tax payments making their way back to the main government due to cash in hand and straight up corruption; from the local handyman right through to large businesses, tax evasion is rife and consequently some parts of Greece do really well but the country as a whole suffers greatly. Unless and until they actually address this, then it doesn't matter what construct Greece is or isn't a part of, the root cause of their problems will never be resolved.Greece has been struggling for more than a hundred years. It is first state that declared bankruptcy in modern times. It has nothing to do with EU, and clearly it has nothing to do with refugees as it happened much before that.
The US should be considered a hostile nation state by the EU. I can't even believe I am typing that but it is where we are. The Anglosphere is on full on facist meltdown and needs to be saved from itself.
The German's weren't the one's pushing for expansion, it was the British.
The EU's problems today stem from lack of further Federalisation, politician's have sold some myths about Southern Europe for short term political expediency. The solution is ever greater union and I hope the EU continues down this path.
While the economic costs are undoubtedly to high to sanction the US it would be quite interesting to see how fast corporate america would kick Trump out of the white house when they can't sell in europe.What exactly would the EU do to the US? Sanctions????