I kid, yes.
However I, personally, lead more on the positive side of that social construction. From the study:
"For example, men might be motivated to attend to womens pleasure with zeal, no matter the circumstance, because their own sexual skill is perceived as the most important element in womens experiences of sexual pleasure."
And not on the negative:
"Conversely, there may be negative repercussions. Men may dismiss important contextual factors and/or womens own agency and experiences around sexual pleasure. For example, if men will not hear a womans insistence that she does not orgasm, does not want to try to orgasm, or orgasms only via nonpartnered stimulation (e.g., self-stimulation or toys), they may experience the absence of womens orgasms as a personal failure or even a challenge."
For me, the study is more indicative of general issues men having shit sexual education
(some don't know what constitutes rape) and that leading to the false impression that ONLY a man can make a women orgasm. I was actually more interested in the additional conclusions from the end of the study. Not that men HAVE to orgasm, but if they don't the sex is bad, they're missing out, you're missing out, and something is wrong. Again, from the study:
"The link between womens orgasms and mens masculinity supports this by suggesting how womens and mens desire to maintain mens feelings of masculinity could prompt medical misattributions of unfulfilled orgasm expectations, namely, when the absence of womens orgasm is treated by both male and female partners as a clinical problem leading to medical diagnoses of dysfunction and disorder."
Overall, interesting, but I'm not a fan of the article itself. Mostly the title. Well, mostly Cosmo.