• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Who is the most famous person in human history?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chuckie

Member
Somebody should start a thread about historical Jesus, because it is actually kind of interesting. It seems a rather controversial topic tbh. Some of the sources in this topic seem to be very influenced by who writes about it.
Like for instance in that Guardian article the writer says their is an abundance of written proof including Josephus, although some of his texts might be altered a bit.
The Wiki article on the other hand states out loud that the paragraphs on Jesus in Josephus' work were added centuries later and clearly false.
 
Religion: Jesus
Politics: Adolf Hitler
Science: Einstein
Sport: Pelé or Cristiano Ronaldo... I'm not sure which one, but definitely someone from football (soccer), it is by far the most played and followed sport globally for generations.
Music: Bach (or Beethoven/Mozart, tough call)
Literature: Shakespeare
Philosophy: Karl Marx
I think philosophy is more likely to be Aristotle or even Plato.
 

MilkyJoe

Member
Theres lots of historical evidence to back up Jesus and Mohammed existing. Theres just no evidence that they were anything more than normal humans. Pretty sure Jesus was just a prominent and controversial political figure in his time.

Or the result of a tall tale that's got out of hand, laid down by a promiscuous Mary of Nazareth...
 

Airola

Member
Nowadays it should be something similar, Jesus - Obama (Trump doesnt have enough exposure time for foreigners) - Cristiano Ronaldo (more of a marketing guy than Messi). I would even argue that Ronaldinho could be near the top as well.

I don't think people are interested in football as much as you would hope they would be :D

Personally I have no idea what Ronaldo looks like. And even less of an idea of what Ronaldinho looks like. I know their names though and know they play football.
But what do I know. Maybe they are known to all and I've just been dropped from the wagon. I mean, I once saw a person who didn't know who Bono and U2 was. Didn't even know them by their name. I guess there must be some very super famous people I'm as ignorant about as that person was.


A more intereting question would be who is the most famous WOMAN in human history.

Mary, the mother of Jesus? lol :D


Maybe Cleopatra? I mean, that's something I could imagine people would easily be able to say if they'd been shown certain pictures.
 

Skux

Member
Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

It's not even close, guys. People all over the world have no idea who Beyonce and Ronaldo are. Everywhere from Africa to Europe to the Americas and most parts of Asia have heard of Jesus.
 

xevis

Banned
Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

It's not even close, guys. People all over the world have no idea who Beyonce and Ronaldo are. Everywhere from Africa to Europe to the Americas and most parts of Asia have heard of Jesus.

Why would people from a non Judeo-Christian-Muslim background know about Jesus? Popstars and sports figures transcend religion.
 
Einstein was a deist who used science to help explain the divine.

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Furthermore, those figures you mention touch upon basic truths of the human condition, especially Jesus and Buddha.

Your adherence to science is anti-intellectual and the fact you think science and religion is either/or is juvenile.
Not everyone shook brainwashing
Else there wouldn't have been all those enemas back then
Or falling back to religion when they couldn't find a answer
 

bwahhhhh

Member
although I wouldn't say he was the most famous ever, of recent figures Pope JP2 has to be up there. was pope nearly 30 years and travelled seemingly everywhere in that time, to places/populations that weren't well tech/tv connected too. lived through the first 10 years of the the WWW, and him dying and the replacement process was on the news for seemingly ages.

he only died in 2005, for some reason it feels a lot longer than that. (probably because we're already on our 2nd Pope after him)
 
Why would people from a non Judeo-Christian-Muslim background know about Jesus? Popstars and sports figures transcend religion.

Simple actually, what year is it now?

It's not 4.something billion in our calendars, it's 2017. We are counting from a specific event in time.
 
Why would people from a non Judeo-Christian-Muslim background know about Jesus? Popstars and sports figures transcend religion.

This is silly, you don't have to be religious to know who Jesus and Mohammed are. Show a man on a cross to literally anyone in the world and they will know it's Jesus. Lots of people have no interest in pop music and sports.
 

Roufianos

Member
Hitler.

I think Alexander is more famous than Caesar, I mean you don't have any countries fabricating history to try and claim descent from Caesar.
 

Mumei

Member
I mean you can distinguish even within that group. I know for a fact some university students at a pretty respectable American institution don't know who Lincoln is. I imagine it's much worse elsewhere. Yet I have a feeling every single student at that university knows who Jesus is. Especially since a number of those have much heavier national/cultural associations.

I confess that even as I was adding him to the list, I suspected that I was stretching things by including him.
 

Chuckie

Member
Western countries but the majority of the worlds population is in the East.

So what do China and Japan use? I know Indonesia primarily uses the Gregorian calendar/years.

Edit: Never mind. The Gregorian calendar is the de facto international standard and only a few countries use a different one.
 
You do know the Christian calendar isn't used by everyone right?

rEepIt9.png


Yes, 5 do not use it at all. And for Islamic countries the point of knowing Jesus still stands with or without counting from AD.

The rest of us use Gregorian as "civil calendar" or at least alongside the "local" one.
 

kapowza

Member
Surely just playing the numbers game it'll be someone that all Chinese / Indian people will know about, like Chairman Mao or Ghandi
 

LInkash

Neo Member
David Beckham is a very good shout.

He's very well known in the US

He's very well known in the countries where football (soccer) is popular which is much of the world. Messi is not that well known outside people who have zero interest in football. I hate to generalise but to give a broad example, a lot women won't have any idea who Messi is but Beckham, absolutely.

Thirdly and very importantly, he's very well known in Asia.

Look at this map to see where where the most people live: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=m...=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=_N3gfTXv7trGlM:
 

Chuckie

Member
David Beckham is a very good shout.

He's very well known in the US

He's very well known in the countries where football (soccer) is popular which is much of the world. Messi is not that well known outside people who have zero interest in football. I hate to generalise but to give a broad example, a lot women won't have any idea who Messi is but Beckham, absolutely.

Thirdly and very importantly, he's very well known in Asia.

His star is already rapidly fading though. Nobody gives a shit about Becks or Posh anymore.
People will have long forgotten him before they forget Jesus or Hitler.
 

Apzu

Member
So what do China and Japan use? I know Indonesia primarily uses the Gregorian calendar/years.

Edit: Never mind. The Gregorian calendar is the de facto international standard and only a few countries use a different one.

You do know the Christian calendar isn't used by everyone right?
The gregorian calendar is used in a lot of countries nowadays, it sort of became the standard because of trade and whatnot. However that doesn't mean everyone that uses the calendar knows the reason why we are in 2017, as I have posted before in Japan and China they don't refer to 2017 AD but more of 2017 in the western calendar. I guess most of us here in GAF know about the existence of chinese or hebrew calendar, but have you ever bothered to know when they started counting and the reason why they chose their year 1?
 

efyu_lemonardo

May I have a cookie?
Actually I'd like to see evidence that the average person in Africa and Asia knows or even cares why the internationally accepted calendar year is 2017.
They could be familiar with the calendar without having ever heard of Jesus.
 
When you look for historicity, you not only search for what is written, you also look for what isn't written.

You know what isn't written about Jesus? Texts that contradict those that are written, remotely near the time they were written.

Jesus is a historical figure, and we are much more sure of this than most other famous historical figures at the time.

There is also the things that were written. If you were inventing or creating a fictional character Son of God, you don't write stuff like his baptism, that he kicked some merchants out of some temple, or that he was crucified and died. He wouldn't have need a baptism, he would be a pacifist and went straight to heaven in a fire carriage or something.

The only problem historians face when determining the life of Jesus, is that there is too much written about him, whereas most historical characters have too little written about them.

This is as far as I know one of the most common arguments in favor of Jesus existing as far as I know; the fact that some parts of the Bible make Jesus look "bad" and hence are probably true since his followers wouldn't want to make him look bad.

However, that seems at odds with the values that Catholicism (supposedly) teaches. I was raised by a Catholic mother in a Catholic country, went to Catholic school, the whole nine yards. Humility and self-sacrifice are important values of Catholicism as I was taught it, so making Jesus look humble and making him die in the most excruciating
(pun intended)
way possible seems to agree with those values.

Note that I don't mean to prove you, or hundreds of scholars wrong with just my own personal experience with Catholicism. It's just odd to me how that theory seems to contradict what I've been taught.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom