Himynameischris
Member
I thought the way Enterprise handled the Borg was fine IF they had to include them but I'd much rather they didn't include them at all.
?
The Borg, or specifically the Borg Queen is the best villain the series has had. Surely with some time travel hi-jinks they could find a way to bring them into Star Trek Discovery without having to ret-con anything.
But isn't this supposed to be in the Prime universe? Meaning Vulcan won't be destroyed at all.
Holy shit fuck yeah.
Though i wonder if lens flare is just a part of Star Trek now.
So are they releasing the episodes all at once on this shitty app no one uses, or will it be a weekly thing?
Plan on subscribing for a month, marathoning, then canceling till season 2.
If you are outside the USA though, I think it'll all be available on Netflix but probably not until the season finishes airing.
Yeah. It's Romulus and Remus that are fucked about 150 years down the line.As far as has been said, it's the Prime Universe. So the Kelvin is fine, and Vulcan will be fine.
Yeah. It's Romulus and Remus that are fucked about 150 years down the line.
Aren't Romulus and Remus pretty much fucked in either timeline? I mean, maybe they can evacuate everybody a century in advance, but that star is pretty much doomed save for a convenient god-intervention (or Spock figuring out the red matter technology a bit earlier, I suppose).
Hey, now that I think about it, would Sybok have died on Vulcan in the new timeline, or did that split happen before Spock left Vulcan to hang out with Pike?
Trailer looks.... okay, I guess. I like the lack of action-for-action's-sake. I need to be reassured that this will go back to "make you think" territory, which is when Star Trek is at its best. I am not hyped but not out of hope.
Yeah. It's Romulus and Remus that are fucked about 150 years down the line.
As silly as it can be Star Trek Online is considered Canon Star Trek for as long as no new series or movie contradicts it.
There are lens flares in The Motion Picture.
They happen when you point lenses at a light source.
It creates an interesting visual effect.
JJ Abrams didn't invent them.
To be fair though JJ's Trek had way more lens flares than would be natural. He even pointed flashlights at the lens just for the effect.
I love them though, they add to the bright hopeful future aestethic. So far Discovery's flare use seems more in line with Mass Effect. If they have constant flares during conversations it could come off as a cheap copy of a quality I think it's fair to say has so far been unique, on a noticeable level, to the alternate timeline. Even if Beyond didn't feature them.
I don't like the look of the Klingons. What's this about them being ancient?
Discovery:
It's stupid though, since we know what TOS Klingons look like and this show is supposed to be 10 years before that...
It's stupid though, since we know what TOS Klingons look like and this show is supposed to be 10 years before that...
Should they have brought out the cardboard sets as well?
To be fair though JJ's Trek had way more lens flares than would be natural. He even pointed flashlights at the lens just for the effect.
Maybe bring back the epic fights too?
just kidding
Should they have brought out the cardboard sets as well?
Didn't they make up a canon reason on Enterprise for why they have smooth foreheads anyway? Or is this retconning a retcon.
Sides, either way I think the 'this aint my trek' people are being weird. It's not like Star Trek has been avove redesigning and ignoring established canon before. They're litteraly yelling at clouds at this point.
People that complain they don't look like TOS klingons are maybe forgetting they were featured in Enterprise as "TNG" style Klingons
They did and it was awful.
Or just ignore it, like they probably should have done in the first place. Worf's line in DS9 about the makeup was funny, but also opened up this whole issue when it really didn't need to be commented on. The Enterprise storyline made it worse.I don't know if it was awful. Maybe stretched out longer then it needed to be. I do think it was a good idea to address it in some manner. In the TOS they're just human looking with crazy eyebrows & mustaches. The Kirk era films look onward is how people really know them and where the bulk of their development as a species took place. Better to make that the default look (like they did in Enterprise as shown from the image above) and explain away how they look in the TOS with some in universe reason. If I recall didn't the Klingons only appear like 7 times in the TOS?
No do not be beholden to that and Enterprise shows they decided a long time ago not to be beholden to how they looked in the TOS when it comes to doing content that takes place before the TOS. Yeah I have no problem with them possibly saying these Klingons are ones that didn't get hit by that virus from Enterprise. I can accept they have more ridges, etc because there is likely a higher budget for each episode here for make up, etc then there was for the past series and there are better techniques at play.
Or just ignore it, like they probably should have done in the first place. Worf's line in DS9 about the makeup was funny, but also opened up this whole issue when it really didn't need to be commented on. The Enterprise storyline made it worse.
The makeup changed, just like it did for Romulans and Trills and many other species. Just ignore it, it's a TV show.
Or just ignore it, like they probably should have done in the first place. Worf's line in DS9 about the makeup was funny, but also opened up this whole issue when it really didn't need to be commented on. The Enterprise storyline made it worse.
The makeup changed, just like it did for Romulans and Trills and many other species. Just ignore it, it's a TV show.
Those guys look more like cardassians than klingons...Also, notice how those other klingons look quite different from the main guy as well:
Did they? They never addressed it for other species and I don't see anyone leading a #notmyTrill campaign for Jadzia.I agree that might have been the most ideal way of dealing with this. They didn't have the make up budget but they're suppose to look how Worf does and call it a day. We might be okay with that. I think majority of people that are big fans or casual fans are. Actually that's pretty much what they did with the films I believe. You're just suppose to accept that's how they were always looked because TOS was made on the cheap. With the hardcore of hardcore fandom though that's not really possible. They had to address it and I think they did okay even if they could have streamlined the overall story they did it in.
I agree that might have been the most ideal way of dealing with this. They didn't have the make up budget but they're suppose to look how Worf does and call it a day. We might be okay with that. I think majority of people that are big fans or casual fans are. Actually that's pretty much what they did with the films I believe. You're just suppose to accept that's how they were always looked because TOS was made on the cheap. With the hardcore of hardcore fandom though that's not really possible. They had to address it and I think they did okay even if they could have streamlined the overall story they did it in.
The ridges never had to be addressed.
Ever.
It was so awful to even attempt to do so.
The worst continuity porn.
The only reason it ever came up is because of the episode where the DS9 crew went back in time to Kirk's enterprise and they used TOS footage.
Otherwise, they probably never would have bothered.
The only reason it ever came up is because of the episode where the DS9 crew went back in time to Kirk's enterprise and they used TOS footage.
Otherwise, they probably never would have bothered.
She's half human half vulcan?
Not really feeling that captain if she's the permanent one. No charisma at all. Should kill her off and have walking dead girl take over. Show itself seems kind of weird and not giving star trek vibes