I'm 100% with Sneakers on the roster. It's not ideal and there are super legitimate complaints/concerns expressed but stamping of the feet and liberally calling it terrible and the worst shit since Nagasaki etc. is patented internet outrage. The other thread is particularly embarrassing in this regard and kind of everything I hate about discussing games on the Internet.
It's part:
- Exorbitant expectations (character from comics, which's popularity have had little-to-no-influence on games since the 90s is "obvious"/given!) - This point is compounded if you've been part of hype cycles before, in which yeah you should kind of know what you're getting into.
- Willful ignorance of the necessity of mainstream sales to, y'know actually fund a title like this instead of the fantasies of SquirrelGRRLFan80.
- The absolutely baffling - yet persisting - sentiment that series are allotted, or worse, deserve a number of reps which for MvC:I and MvC3 was never mentioned in their criteria for selecting characters (remember MvC3? When people were guessing each SF series would get it's own rep?)
- Willful ignorance that gameplay needs (i.e. say for heavies like Nemesis) may sometimes come before throwing a bone to your favourite dead franchise. And this is touchy because playstyles are mostly unique so it's at the dev's discretion.
- And a little bit of trying to put method to the madness that is Capcom, which I can totally understand, we all want order when trying to predict a roster, but this comes at the cost of building an unstable tower of assumptions about the roster as time goes on. Look how quick people were to develop assumptions about the comic book cross-promotion.
- Lastly, pure disappointment that your favourite character(s) did not get in. This I also understand, and it's a make/break thing for a lot of people.
And this is after taking stock of legitimate concerns about roster size and conventions for picks, AND my personal belief that MvC has always been a gateway into the comics because it's what got me to care about comic book characters in the first place all those years ago. I'm also totally with the idea of just throwing all mainstays out the window and increasing the number of quirky/obscure as much as possible. But I know I'm in the minority. I'm also not mortally offended that the majority of Marvel fans today are not like me, and can deal with that because I'm a fan of these characters too. Yet, we make these assumptions or rules or guidelines for expectations that have been knowingly crossed or never followed in the first place and use those as realistic, not ideal, expectations? Why? I don't get it.
tl;dr: Hyperbole sucks. The roster is not the greatest, but it's definitely fine, and definitely not bad. People would be begging for Ultron and X if they were replaced by others anyways.
On a related note, and not to make it a contest, but IMO the lack of female and PoC reps is a way bigger social/industry and commercial/sales issue than 28 or 38 characters, or any character individually not getting in. Especially if that gets some momentum behind it.