Perhaps not, and her being female is a major contributing factor, but importantly it is not on its
the reason.
Her death is in
large part problematic
specifically because of the film's depictions of women. Her suddenly becoming a man removes the contextual issues surrounding her character and thus dramatically change how the death is perceived.
The character is presented as unsympathetic and deserving of the death (one that's ostensibly intended to be a crowd pleaser), due to facets of her character that involve traditionally problematic depictions of working women in Hollywood and her (rightfully) being more concerned with her own issues than with babysitting her boss's nephews (who should be able to take care of themselves at their respective ages). And it's the fact that, this character, receives a death so clearly supposed to be a crowd pleasing punisher, for those reasons, it's what's
so damn grating.
To go further, combine that with:
- Claire's character leaning heavily on Hollywood tropes regarding working women that date back nearly a century (tropes that have real world origins in actual sexist beliefs that have negatively impacted women in the workplace for decades), such as being presented as being incapable of simultaneously living life as a functional human and being a successful businessperson (and having to have men constantly point it out), as well as:
- her sister constantly telling this extremely successful businessperson that her life can't have meaning until she becomes a mother, whose stance is validated by the movie and Claire's character arc (she grows as a character specifically by learning to develop maternal instincts towards her nephews)
- and the fact that the only other major female really only exists to 1) give the audience emotional cues and 2) to be Lowery's crush (and leaves the movie at the same point it's revealed he has no chance)
and it all just feels
really gross. And it's because of all that context that changing it to a male diminishes the problem.
As an aside, it's also worth noting that:
1) There is only one death in the franchise with the same depiction of brutality and anywhere near as lengthy of runtime - Dieter Stark's death by compies in The Lost World, which everyone would agree is supposed to be an deliberately
punishing death, enacted upon an explicitly deserving character. Stark is never presented sympathetically - he takes joy in electrocuting a small animal for no reason, starts a fight with a protagonist, and is shown to be incompetent at his job. None of these unsympathetic depictions are rooted in problematic elements, and they "justify" his lengthy, excruciating, and horrific death, hence why no one takes issue with it. Had Zara been depicted in the same way, or at least her death-justifying aspects not had a base in sexism, you would have heard much less about it.
2) Colin Trevorrow
himself has some pretty clear issues with sexism, which further solidifies arguments into these sorts of readings into Jurassic World and its scenes. He has stated that he believes the reason women aren't directing blockbusters is because they don't want it enough (a common excuse to explain away lack of women in any and all fields of work), as well as his other works showing deep problems, such as Home Base (the two-line Wikipedia summary alone is
grating as fuck)